Electrostatic, adsorption interactions

B. Observations of hydrophobic interactions Adsorption with Attractive Electrostatic Interactions Adsorption with Repulsive Electrostatic Interactions Adsorption of Mixed Surfactants... 

We also attempt to distinguish between surface physical chemistry and colloid and polymer physical chemistry. This distinction is not always possible, and clearly many of the features of physical chemistry of surfaces, such as the electrostatic interactions and adsorption of macromolecules, have a significant... 

Protein adsorption has been studied with a variety of techniques such as ellipsome-try [107,108], ESCA [109], surface forces measurements [102], total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRE) [103,110], electron microscopy [111], and electrokinetic measurement of latex particles [112,113] and capillaries [114], The TIRE technique has recently been adapted to observe surface diffusion [106] and orientation [IIS] in adsorbed layers. These experiments point toward the significant influence of the protein-surface interaction on the adsorption characteristics [105,108,110]. A very important interaction is due to the hydrophobic interaction between parts of the protein and polymeric surfaces [18], although often electrostatic interactions are also influential [ 116]. Protein desorption can be affected by altering the pH [117] or by the introduction of a complexing agent [118]. 

A detailed study by Grieser and co-workers [169] of the forces between a gold-coated colloidal silica sphere and a gold surface reveals the preferential adsorption of citrate ions over chloride to alter the electrostatic interaction. 

Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces. Water is a small, highly polar molecular and it is therefore strongly adsorbed on a polar surface as a result of the large contribution from the electrostatic forces. Polar adsorbents such as most zeoHtes, siUca gel, or activated alumina therefore adsorb water more strongly than they adsorb organic species, and, as a result, such adsorbents are commonly called hydrophilic. In contrast, on a nonpolar surface where there is no electrostatic interaction water is held only very weakly and is easily displaced by organics. Such adsorbents, which are the only practical choice for adsorption of organics from aqueous solutions, are termed hydrophobic. 

Electrostatic Interactions. This is the mechanism that operates when adsorption sites and reagents carry opposite electrical charge signs. 

Electrostatic Interaction. Similarly charged particles repel one another. The charges on a particle surface may be due to hydrolysis of surface groups or adsorption of ions from solution. The surface charge density can be converted to an effective surface potential, /, when the potential is <30 mV, using the foUowing equation, where -Np represents the Faraday constant and Ai the gas law constant. 

The size of particles removed by such filters is less than the size of the passages. The mechanism of removal includes adsorption (qv) of the impurities at the interface between the media and the water either by specific chemical or van der Waals attractions or by electrostatic interaction when the medium particles have surface charges opposite to those on the impurities to be removed. 

In the absence of dyes, APA- and AdPA-grafted silica bind La(III) with, respectively, 0.20 and 0.27 mmol/g sorption capacity, resulting in formation of 1 2 (La L) complexes. 50% of introduced cation is bonded at pH=5 (APA), pH=6.1 (AdPA) and complete adsorption occurs at pH=6 (APA), pH=6.5 (AdPA). The grafted support in absence of La adsorbs the chosen dyes at pH<4 due to the electrostatic interaction with the -NH, groups on the surface, present as a result of grafting procedure. The adsorption of dyes at pH>4 is insignificant. 

In some cases, e.g., the Hg/NaF q interface, Q is charge dependent but concentration independent. Then it is said that there is no specific ionic adsorption. In order to interpret the charge dependence of Q a standard explanation consists in assuming that Q is related to the existence of a solvent monolayer in contact with the wall [16]. From a theoretical point of view this monolayer is postulated as a subsystem coupled with the metal and the solution via electrostatic and non-electrostatic interactions. The specific shape of Q versus a results from the competition between these interactions and the interactions between solvent molecules in the mono-layer. This description of the electrical double layer has been revisited by... 

Electrostatic and adsorption effects conspire to make aqueous GPC more likely to be nonideal than organic solvent GPC. Thus, universal calibration is often not obeyed in aqueous systems. Elence, it is much more critical that the standard chosen for calibration share with the polymer being analyzed chemical characteristics that affect these interactions. Because standards that meet this criterion are often not available, it is prudent to include in each analysis set a sample of a secondary standard of the same composition and molecular weight as the sample. Thus, changes in the chromatography of the analyte relative to the standards will be detected. 

Thus the potential difference at the interface between a metal and electrolyte solution is due to both the charges at the interface (electrostatic potential difference) and the surface dipole layers the latter is referred to as the surface or adsorption potential difference. On the basis of the above considerations it might appear that adsorption at a metal surface with an excess charge is solely due to electrostatic interaction with charged species in the solution, i.e. if the metal surface has an excess negative charge the cations... 

In the following paper, the possibility of equilibration of the primarily adsorbed portions of polymer was analyzed [20]. The surface coupling constant (k0) was introduced to characterize the polymer-surface interaction. The constant k0 includes an electrostatic interaction term, thus being k0 > 1 for polyelectrolytes and k0 1 for neutral polymers. It was found that, theoretically, the adsorption characteristics do not depend on the equilibration processes for k0 > 1. In contrast, for neutral polymers (k0 < 1), the difference between the equilibrium and non-equilibrium modes could be considerable. As more polymer is adsorbed, excluded-volume effects will swell out the loops of the adsorbate, so that the mutual reorientation of the polymer chains occurs. 

We start by noting that the Langmuir isotherm approach does not take into account the electrostatic interaction between the dipole of the adsorbate and the field of the double layer. This interaction however is quite important as already shown in section 4.5.9.2. In order to account explicitly for this interaction one can write the adsorption equilibrium (Eq. 6.24) in the form ... 

Usually adsorption, i.e. binding of foreign particles to the surface of a solid body, is distinguished as physical and chemical the difference lying in the type of adsorbate - adsorbent interaction. Physical adsorption is assumed to be a surface binding caused by polarization dipole-dipole Van-der-Vaals interaction whereas chemical adsorption, as any chemical interaction, stems from covalent forces with plausible involvement of electrostatic interaction. In contrast to chemisorption in which, as it has been already mentioned, an absorbed particle and adsorbent itself become a unified quantum mechanical system, the physical absorption only leads to a weak perturbation of the lattice of a solid body. 

In fact this "unhydrolyzed" polyacrylamide sample is slightly charged and its low polyectrolyte character is confirmed by a slight difference of red values at pH 7 and 5, for salt free solutions. A really neutral polymer should be necessary to differentiate low effects of electrostatic interactions from non ionic interactions. coordination binding at low pH and hydrogen bonds at pH 7. Nevertheless, at this pH, the adsorption of the chain on Al(0H)3 aggregates can probably be considered as the main origin of the loss of viscosity. 

---