Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrostatic interactions attraction

Figures 5.7 and 5.8 sketch a picture of the first two permanent electric moments (au) for a selection of noncentrosymmetric and centrosymmetric molecules, respectively. The notation is the same as that given in Mag-nasco et al. (1988). It is understood that the point-like multipoles are placed at the centre of mass of the molecule, their sign in relation to the molecular structure of the monomer being of fundamental importance in determining the nature of the electrostatic interaction (attractive or repulsive). The numbers shown in each figure are from SCF calculations and so are little larger than those given in Table 5.2. Figures 5.7 and 5.8 sketch a picture of the first two permanent electric moments (au) for a selection of noncentrosymmetric and centrosymmetric molecules, respectively. The notation is the same as that given in Mag-nasco et al. (1988). It is understood that the point-like multipoles are placed at the centre of mass of the molecule, their sign in relation to the molecular structure of the monomer being of fundamental importance in determining the nature of the electrostatic interaction (attractive or repulsive). The numbers shown in each figure are from SCF calculations and so are little larger than those given in Table 5.2.
Usee Net secondary electrostatic interactions (attractive - repulsive)... [Pg.100]

The exchange repulsion and dispersive attraction com bine in what is referred to as a van der Waals term. Sometimes a potential is added to account for hydrogen bonding explicitly while in other situations this is expected to fall out of ordinary electrostatic interactions. [Pg.174]

EIectrosta.tlcs. Electrostatic interactions, such as salt bridges, result from the electrostatic attraction that occurs between oppositely charged molecules. These usually involve a single cation, eg, the side chain of Lys or Arg, or the amino terminus, etc, interacting with a single anion, eg, the side chain of Glu or Asp, or the carboxyl terminus, etc. This attractive force is iaversely proportional to the distance between the charges and the dielectric constant of the solvent, as described by Coulomb s law. [Pg.196]

Sorption of nonionic, nonpolar hydrophobic compounds occurs by weak attractive interactions such as van der Waals forces. Net attraction is the result of dispersion forces the strength of these weak forces is about 4 to 8 kj/mol ( 1 2 kcal/mol). Electrostatic interactions can also be important, especially when a molecule is polar in nature. Attraction potential can develop between polar molecules and the heterogeneous sod surface that has ionic and polar sites, resulting in stronger sorption. [Pg.221]

The size of particles removed by such filters is less than the size of the passages. The mechanism of removal includes adsorption (qv) of the impurities at the interface between the media and the water either by specific chemical or van der Waals attractions or by electrostatic interaction when the medium particles have surface charges opposite to those on the impurities to be removed. [Pg.276]

The archetype of the ionic ceramic is sodium chloride ("rocksalt"), NaCl, shown in Fig. 16.1(a). Each sodium atom loses an electron to a chlorine atom it is the electrostatic attraction between the Na ions and the CF ions that holds the crystal together. To achieve the maximum electrostatic interaction, each Na has 6 CF neighbours and no Na neighbours (and vice versa) there is no way of arranging single-charged ions that does better than this. So most of the simple ionic ceramics with the formula AB have the rocksalt structure. [Pg.168]

Another problem arises from the presence of higher terms in the multipole expansion of the electrostatic interaction. While theoretical formulas exist for these also, they are even more approximate than those for the dipole-dipole term. Also, there is the uncertainty about the exact form of the repulsive interaction. Quite arbitrarily we shall group the higher multipole terms with the true repulsive interaction and assume that the empirical repulsive term accounts for both. The principal merit of this assumption is simplicity the theoretical and experimental coefficients of the R Q term are compared without adjustment. Since the higher multipole terms are known to be attractive and have been estimated to amount to about 20 per cent of the total attractive potential at the minimum, a rough correction for their possible effect can be made if it is believed that this is a preferable assumption. [Pg.70]

In 1997, a Chinese research group [78] used the colloidal solution of 70-nm-sized carboxylated latex particles as a subphase and spread mixtures of cationic and other surfactants at the air-solution interface. If the pH was sufficiently low (1.5-3.0), the electrostatic interaction between the polar headgroups of the monolayer and the surface groups of the latex particles was strong enough to attract the latex to the surface. A fairly densely packed array of particles could be obtained if a 2 1 mixture of octadecylamine and stearic acid was spread at the interface. The particle films could be transferred onto solid substrates using the LB technique. The structure was studied using transmission electron microscopy. [Pg.217]

The stability of colloids can also be dramatically altered by inclusion of polymeric materials. If the polymer interacts favourably with the particle surfaces, i.e. it adsorbs, then both an increase and a reduction in stability is possible, via modification of the electrostatic interaction of the polymer is charged or a reduction in the van der Waals attraction. [Pg.104]


See other pages where Electrostatic interactions attraction is mentioned: [Pg.444]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.2675]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.231]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.291 , Pg.1048 ]




SEARCH



Interaction attraction

Interaction electrostatic

Interactions attractive

Lewis acid-base interaction electrostatic attraction/covalent

© 2024 chempedia.info