Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrostatic, adsorption field

The influence of the surface polarity of powders on their adsorption and dispersion properties can be profound, as is discussed in Sec. VIII,A. The values of F are likely to be put to many uses as more of them are measured. The electrostatic surface fields are doubtless involved in the phenomena of chemisorption and catalysis, capable of inducing polarization or electron shift of adsorbing molecules. For silica-alumina catalysts, the production of active M-O-M surface groups must be considered the most important factor responsible for chemisorption and catalj ic activity. [Pg.286]

Surface complexation models (SCM s) provide a rational interpretation of the physical and chemical processes of adsorption and are able to simulate adsorption in complex geochemical systems. Chemical reactions at the solid-solution interface are treated as surface complexation reactions analogous to the formation of complexes in solution. Each reaction is defined in terms of a mass action equation and an equilibrium constant. The activities of adsorbing ions are modified by a coulombic term to account for the energy required to penetrate the electrostatic-potential field extending away from the surface. Detailed information on surface complexation theory and the models that have been developed, can be found in (Stumm et al., 1976 ... [Pg.94]

Generally, upon adsorption, the intensity of UV-VIS bands is significantly altered caused by an increase or a decrease in the extinction coefficient e. This effect depends mainly on the adsorption geometry, i.e., whether the electronic vector of the adsorbed species is parallel or perpendicular to the electrostatic surface field. In addition, e may follow a direct or inverse variation with coverage 0, some-... [Pg.362]

For the film thickness, as a first approximation, one can take that Lf = K. Another simplifying assumption is that the viscosity changes abruptly at the boundary between the film and the solution. Estimation of the viscosity of the film as a function of potential is very difficult, since electro-neutrality is not maintained in the diffuse double layer, and it is difficult to take into account the influence of the electric field in the double layer on the viscosity of the film. Instead, the viscosity of the film, tjf, can be taken as a parameter, to fit the theoretical curve to the experimental results. To do this one substracts from the observed frequency shift the contribution of the mass effect caused by electrostatic adsorption of ions [Eq. (56)]. [Pg.39]

The above-presented results and others discussed elsewhere [1,12-14,37,76] confirmed quantitatively the validity of the eonveetive diffusion theory incorporating the specific (electrostatic) force fields for interpreting particle adsorption phenomena under the linear regime. [Pg.345]

Forces of Adsorption. Adsorption may be classified as chemisorption or physical adsorption, depending on the nature of the surface forces. In physical adsorption the forces are relatively weak, involving mainly van der Waals (induced dipole—induced dipole) interactions, supplemented in many cases by electrostatic contributions from field gradient—dipole or —quadmpole interactions. By contrast, in chemisorption there is significant electron transfer, equivalent to the formation of a chemical bond between the sorbate and the soHd surface. Such interactions are both stronger and more specific than the forces of physical adsorption and are obviously limited to monolayer coverage. The differences in the general features of physical and chemisorption systems (Table 1) can be understood on the basis of this difference in the nature of the surface forces. [Pg.251]

The orientational structure of water near a metal surface has obvious consequences for the electrostatic potential across an interface, since any orientational anisotropy creates an electric field that interacts with the metal electrons. Hydrogen bonds are formed mainly within the adsorbate layer but also between the adsorbate and the second layer. Fig. 3 already shows quite clearly that the requirements of hydrogen bond maximization and minimization of interfacial dipoles lead to preferentially planar orientations. On the metal surface, this behavior is modified because of the anisotropy of the water/metal interactions which favors adsorption with the oxygen end towards the metal phase. [Pg.362]

Figure 6.16. Different modes of adsorption of CHjOH on Pt under ultra-high vacuum (left) and in aqueous solutions (right) showing the effect of local electrostatic field and surface work function on the mode of adsorption.100 Reprinted with permission from the American Chemical Society. Figure 6.16. Different modes of adsorption of CHjOH on Pt under ultra-high vacuum (left) and in aqueous solutions (right) showing the effect of local electrostatic field and surface work function on the mode of adsorption.100 Reprinted with permission from the American Chemical Society.
We start by noting that the Langmuir isotherm approach does not take into account the electrostatic interaction between the dipole of the adsorbate and the field of the double layer. This interaction however is quite important as already shown in section 4.5.9.2. In order to account explicitly for this interaction one can write the adsorption equilibrium (Eq. 6.24) in the form ... [Pg.308]

In the electrode-solution interphase, the adsorption of these substances is also affected by the influence of the electric field in the double layer on their dipoles. Substances that collect in the interphase as a result of forces other than electrostatic are termed surface-active substances or surfactants. [Pg.210]

At present it is impossible to formulate an exact theory of the structure of the electrical double layer, even in the simple case where no specific adsorption occurs. This is partly because of the lack of experimental data (e.g. on the permittivity in electric fields of up to 109 V m"1) and partly because even the largest computers are incapable of carrying out such a task. The analysis of a system where an electrically charged metal in which the positions of the ions in the lattice are known (the situation is more complicated with liquid metals) is in contact with an electrolyte solution should include the effect of the electrical field on the permittivity of the solvent, its structure and electrolyte ion concentrations in the vicinity of the interface, and, at the same time, the effect of varying ion concentrations on the structure and the permittivity of the solvent. Because of the unsolved difficulties in the solution of this problem, simplifying models must be employed the electrical double layer is divided into three regions that interact only electrostatically, i.e. the electrode itself, the compact layer and the diffuse layer. [Pg.224]

The diffuse layer is formed, as mentioned above, through the interaction of the electrostatic field produced by the charge of the electrode, or, for specific adsorption, by the charge of the ions in the compact layer. In rigorous formulation of the problem, the theory of the diffuse layer should consider ... [Pg.225]

Maehashi et al. (2007) used pyrene adsorption to make carbon nanotubes labeled with DNA aptamers and incorporated them into a field effect transistor constructed to produce a label-free biosensor. The biosensor could measure the concentration of IgE in samples down to 250 pM, as the antibody molecules bound to the aptamers on the nanotubes. Felekis and Tagmatarchis (2005) used a positively charged pyrene compound to prepare water-soluble SWNTs and then electrostatically adsorb porphyrin rings to study electron transfer interactions. Pyrene derivatives also have been used successfully to add a chromophore to carbon nanotubes using covalent coupling to an oxidized SWNT (Alvaro et al., 2004). In this case, the pyrene ring structure was not used to adsorb directly to the nanotube surface, but a side-chain functional group was used to link it covalently to modified SWNTs. [Pg.645]

In general, the contact adsorption of anions creates an electric field of intensity Sto in the inner Helmholtz layer, which may be greater than the average field intensity of. B,v = ( in +. Eout)/2, where aat is the field intensity in the outer Helmholtz layer. The rate of field increase rj may be derived from electrostatics as shown in Eqn. 5-50 [Liu, 1983] ... [Pg.156]


See other pages where Electrostatic, adsorption field is mentioned: [Pg.1175]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.810]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.1204]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.124]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.87 , Pg.92 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption electrostatic

Electrostatic field

© 2024 chempedia.info