Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interphase electrode-solution

As we have mentioned before, acoustic streaming, cavitation and other effects derived from them, microjetting and shock waves take also relevance when the ultrasound field interacts with solid walls. On the other hand, an electrochemical process is a heterogeneous electron transfer which takes place in the interphase electrode-solution, it means, in a very located zone of the electrochemical system. Therefore, a carefully and comprehensive read reveals that all these phenomena can provide opposite effects in an electrochemical process. For example, shock waves can avoid the passivation of the electrode or damage the electrode surface depending on the electrode process and/or strength of the electrode materials [29]. [Pg.109]

In section 1.5.3.1 the effect of resistive electrodes was treated and in fact one subdomain could be an electrode (e.g. fig. 3.12). The boundary conditions on the interphase electrode-solution would then contain the overvoltages ... [Pg.115]

Concerning the indicator electrodes often it is distinguished between metallic and membrane electrodes. The potential of a metallic electrode is determined by a redox reaction at the interphase electrode/solution. Basically there are three different kinds of metal-based indicator electrodes (Table 1) ... [Pg.1694]

In the electrode-solution interphase, the adsorption of these substances is also affected by the influence of the electric field in the double layer on their dipoles. Substances that collect in the interphase as a result of forces other than electrostatic are termed surface-active substances or surfactants. [Pg.210]

As mentioned in Section 5.1, adsorption of components of the electrolysed solution plays an essential role in electrode processes. Adsorption of reagents or products or of the intermediates of the electrode reaction or other components of the solution that do not participate directly in the electrode reaction can sometimes lead to acceleration of the electrode reaction or to a change in its mechanism. This phenomenon is termed electrocatalysis. It is typical of electrocatalytic electrode reactions that they depend strongly on the electrode material, on the composition of the electrode-solution interphase, and, in the case of single-crystal electrodes, on the crystallographic index of the face in contact with the solution. [Pg.363]

Vibrational spectroscopy techniques are quite suitable for in situ characterization of catalysts. Especially infrared spectroscopy has been used extensively for characterization of the electrode/solution interphases, adsorbed species and their dependence on the electrode potential.33,34 Raman spectroscopy has been used to a lesser extent in characterizing non-precious metal ORR catalysts, most of the studies being related to characterization of the carbon structures.35 A review of the challenges and applications associated with in situ Raman Spectroscopy at metal electrodes has been provided by Pettinger.36... [Pg.339]

Mass transport processes are involved in the overall reaction. In these processes the substances consumed or formed during the electrode reaction are transported from the bulk solution to the interphase (electrode surface) and from the interphase to the bulk... [Pg.77]

Eor an electrochemical reaction the rate of reaction v and the rate constant k depend on potential E specifically, the potential difference across electrode-solution interphase Acf) through the electrochemical activation energy AGf. Thus, the central problem here is to find the function... [Pg.81]

Electrodic reactions that underlie the processes of metal deposition, etc., cannot be understood without knowing the potential difference at the electrode/solution interface and how it varies with distance from the electrode. The ions from the solution must be electrically energized to cross the interphase region and deposit on the metal. This electrical energy must be picked up from the field at the interface, which itself depends upon the double-layer structure. Thus, control over metal deposition processes can be improved by an increased understanding of double layers at metal/solutioii interfaces. [Pg.64]

Figure 2.13 illustrates what is currently a widely accepted model of the electrode-solution interphase. This model has evolved from simpler models, which first considered the interphase as a simple capacitor (Helmholtz), then as a Boltzmann distribution of ions (Gouy-Chapman). The electrode is covered by a sheath of oriented solvent molecules (water molecules are illustrated). Adsorbed anions or molecules, A, contact the electrode directly and are not fully solvated. The plane that passes through the center of these molecules is called the inner Helmholtz plane (IHP). Such molecules or ions are said to be specifically adsorbed or contact adsorbed. The molecules in the next layer carry their primary (hydration) shell and are separated from the electrode by the monolayer of oriented solvent (water) molecules adsorbed on the electrode. The plane passing through the center of these solvated molecules or ions is referred to as the outer Helmholtz plane (OHP). Beyond the compact layer defined by the OHP is a Boltzmann distribution of ions determined by electrostatic interaction between the ions and the potential at the OHP and the random jostling of ions and... [Pg.29]

Figure 2.12 Simple capacitor model of electrode-solution interface as a charged double layer (original Helmholtz model). Negatively charged surface. Positively charged ions are attracted to the surface, forming an electrically neutral interphase. Figure 2.12 Simple capacitor model of electrode-solution interface as a charged double layer (original Helmholtz model). Negatively charged surface. Positively charged ions are attracted to the surface, forming an electrically neutral interphase.
Figure 2.13 Model of the electrode-solution interphase as described by Bockris, Devanathan, and Muller [J. O M. Bockris and A. K. N. Reddy, Modem Electrochemistry, Vol. 2, Chap. 7, Plenum, New York, 1970.]... Figure 2.13 Model of the electrode-solution interphase as described by Bockris, Devanathan, and Muller [J. O M. Bockris and A. K. N. Reddy, Modem Electrochemistry, Vol. 2, Chap. 7, Plenum, New York, 1970.]...
Mass transport processes are involved in the overall reaction. In these processes the substances consumed or formed during the electrode reaction are transported from the bulk solution to the interphase (electrode surface) and from the interphase to the bulk solution. This mass transport takes place by diffusion. Pure diffusion overpotential t]A occurs if the mass transport is the slowest process among the partial processes involved in the overall electrode reaction. In this case diffusion is the rate-determining step. [Pg.73]

Another distortion reason is related to the charging of the double layer formed at the electrode-solution interphase. The reorganization of solvent dipoles and ions at the solution phase layer adjacent to the electrode as a response to the application... [Pg.359]

In the mechanisms to be described in this section, one of the idealizations of electrochemistry is being portrayed. Thus, in perfectly polarizable metal electrodes, it is accepted that no charge passes when the potential is changed. However, in reality, a small current does pass across a perfectly polarizable electrode/solution interphase. In the same way, here the statement free from surface states (which has been assumed in the account given above) means in reality that the concentration of surface states in certain semiconductors is relatively small, say, less than 10 states cm. So when one refers to the low surface state case, as here, one means that the surface of the semiconductor, particularly in respect to sites energetically in the energy gap, is covered with less than the stated number per unit area. A surface absolutely free of electronic states in the surface is an idealization. (If 1012 sounds like a large number, it is in fact only about one surface site in a thousand.) A consequence of this is the location of the potential difference at the interphase of a semiconductor with a solution. As shown in Fig. 10.1(a), the potential difference is inside the semiconductor, and outside in the solution there is almost no potential difference at all. [Pg.34]

Since the advantage of using nonaqueous systems in electrochemistry lies in their wide electrochemical windows and low reactivity toward active electrodes, it is crucial to minimize atmospheric contaminants such as 02, H20, N2, C02, as well as possible protic contaminants such as alcoholic and acidic precursors of these solvents. In aprotic media, these contaminants may be electrochemically active on electrode surfaces, even at the ppm level. In particular, when the electrolytes comprise metallic cations (e.g., Li, Mg, Na), the reduction of all the above-mentioned atmospheric contaminants at low potentials may form surface films as the insoluble products precipitate on the electrode surfaces. In such cases, the metal-solution interface becomes much more complicated than their original design. Electron transfer, for instance, takes place through electrode-solution rate limiting interphase. Hence, the commonly distributed solvents and salts for usual R D in chemistry, even in an analytical grade, may not be sufficient for use as received in electrochemical systems. [Pg.92]

At the electrode equilibrium potential Feq e the cathodic current, ic, and the anodic one, 4, which represent the reduction and oxidation reaction rates at the electrode-solution interphase, respectively, are equal and the net current i = jid - /a is zero the ic = 4 value is called the exchange current, iq. The passage of net current i 0) through the cell causes some changes with respect to equilibrium, and these are generically indicated by the term polarizations . The differenee between the value of the electrode potential under flowing current, Fi g, and that of the equilib-... [Pg.3821]

Experimentally it was early recognized that an electrode/solution interphase behaves as a capacitor [74]. This is because the negatively charged surface of the cathode generates a very strong electrical field that tends to attract positive ions from the solution, as sketched in Fig. 14a. The positive layer thus formed exerts, on the solution side, an electrical field of opposite direction that attracts negative ions from the solution. [Pg.43]

Finally, in the case of the conductance studies, the IR drop is to be precisely measured and the measured conductivity of an electrochemical cell should be properly divided between the conductivity of solution and conductivity of other cell components including the electrode/solution interphases. Applying the electrochemical... [Pg.730]

Posdorfer J, Olbrich-Stock M, Schindler RN (1994) Electrochim Acta 39 2005 Posdorfer J, Olbrich-Stock M, Schindler RN (1994) J Electroanal Chem 368 173 Hansen WN (1973) Internal reflection spectroscopy in electrochemistry. In Muller RH (ed) Advances in electrochemistry tmd electrochemical engineering, vol 9. John Wiley, New York McIntyre IDE (1973) Specular reflection spectroscopy of the electrode-solution interphase. In Muller RH (ed) Advances in electrochemistry and electrochemical engineering, vol 9. John WUey, New York... [Pg.200]

On the contrary, a separate adsorption peak is displayed prior to or after the diffusion-controlled peak when redox products or reactants, respectively, are strongly adsorbed. These adsorption-controlled peaks can be identified because they are symmetrical about /p, unlike diffusion-controlled peaks, and a linear dependence of their height with (Co) is usually observed only in a narrow range of low concentrations, while a constant value for ip is attained at higher (Co) . Moreover, ip for adsorption peaks increases linearly with v instead of (eqn [5]), because the electrode-solution interphase, in the presence of adsorbed species, behaves like a capacitor, whose capacitive current (C) is... [Pg.4940]

Having obtained values of A and p for the electrode/solution interface of interest, or more commonly detected changes as the electrode potential is varied, the next step is to relate these values to the properties of the interface. As with all reflection techniques, this is usually done in terms of a three layer model consisting of bulk substrate/interfacial region/bulk solution as shown in Fig. 10.10. Assuming the optical constants of the substrate and solution and the film thickness are known, it is possible to obtain unique values of the effective optical constants of the interphase from A and p [15]. The optical characteristics of any phase are simply defined by p, the magnetic permeability (usually equal to unity) and either the wavelength dependent complex dielectric constant defined by Equation (10.11)... [Pg.329]

We have seen that the electrode-solution interphase acts like a parallel-plate condenser and that one could assign to it quantities that are commonly associated with a condenser, such as capacity, quantity of charge and potential difference. Taking the time derivatives of equation 2.2 yields... [Pg.13]

One electrode reaction takes place at the cathode surface, the other at the anode surface once the current has crossed the electrode-solution interphase, it is carried by ions through the solution until it reaches the other electrodesolution interphase where it is transferred to the metallic conductor again. This type of current is called faradaic current . [Pg.14]

First let us turn our attention to the metal surface and understand the simplifications which we usually make when considering it as part of the electrode-solution interphase then we shall present a model for the structure of the solution at the interphase and discuss the expected behaviour of this model when the potential of the electrode varies. We shall continue to discuss the influence that the interphase may have on electrode reactions and conclude this section by enumerating the different variables which are important in the study of the interphase. [Pg.66]

The first attempt to describe the electrode-solution interphase in electrostatic terms was made by Helmholtz in 1879. His model, which is shown in Fig. 23 is essentially that of a simple parallel plate capacitor the charge on... [Pg.74]


See other pages where Interphase electrode-solution is mentioned: [Pg.18]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.3047]    [Pg.4935]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 , Pg.13 , Pg.61 , Pg.66 , Pg.112 ]




SEARCH



Electrode interphase

Electrode solution

Interphase

Interphase electrode-solution electrical field

Interphase electrode-solution forces

Interphase electrode-solution structure

Interphases

© 2024 chempedia.info