Electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction rates, substituents effect

All of these effects are observed when comparing the rates of various electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. Activating substituents increase the rate of reaction relative to benzene. The rate of reaction for the nitration of anisole, for example, was 9.7 x 10 times faster than nitration of benzene. The reaction of anisole with nitric and sulfuric acids, gave 44% of o-nitroanisole, 56% of p-nitroanisole and < 1% of m-nitro-anisole.2 9 contrasts with reactions involving deactivating substituents, where selectivity for the meta -product is usually very good. Nitration of nitrobenzene, for example, gave 1,3-dinitrobenzene in 94% yield, with only 6% of the ortho product and < 1% of the para product. ... 

These relative rate data per position are experimentally detennined and are known as partial rate factors. They offer a convenient way to express substituent effects in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. 

Table 12.2 summarizes orientation and rate effects in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions for a variety of frequently encountered substituents. It is arianged in order of decreasing activating power the most strongly activating substituents are at the top, the most strongly deactivating substituents are at the bottom. The main features of the table can be summarized as follows ... 

Hammond postulate has been used to explain the effect of substituents on the rate of benzilic acid rearrangements, mechanism of electrophillic aromatic substitution reactions and reactions involving highly reactive intermediates such as carbonium ions and carbon ions. 

Predicting the Effect of a Substituent on the Rate and Regiochemistry of an Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Reaction... 

Table 17.1 Effect of Substituents on the Rate and Regiochemistry of Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions...

Predict the effect of these substituents on the rate and regiochemistry of electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions ... 

If the other reactant is an electrophile and a strong Lewis acid or proton acid is present, then the aromatic ring acts as the nucleophile and the reaction is one of the electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions listed in Table 17.2. Do not forget to consider the directive and rate effects of substituents on the aromatic ring. 

Predict the effect of a substituent on the rate and the regiochemistry of an electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction. 

Electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions (Sec. 15.1) are among the best understood of all organic reactions. The qtuilitative aspects of the reactions that are discussed in textbooks include the effect substituents have on the reactivity of arenes toward electrophiles and the orientation, ortho, meta, or para, of their attack on the ring. However, relatively Httle information is given in textbooks about the quantitative differences in rates and reactivities of substituted aromatic compounds. The experimental procedures of this section provide both semiquantitative and quantitative measures of the differences in reactivity of a series of arenes toward the bromo-nium ion, Br, to produce the corresponding aryl bromides (Eq. 15.20). 

In the preceding section, we saw that a substituent influences both the rate and distribution of products in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. The abihty of a substituent either to donate or withdraw electron density from the aromatic ring determines both the rate of the reaction and the product distribution. Let s consider the effect of a group, G, on the electron density of the benzene ring. 

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. 

The applicability of the two-parameter equation and the constants devised by Brown to electrophilic aromatic substitutions was tested by plotting values of the partial rate factors for a reaction against the appropriate substituent constants. It was maintained that such comparisons yielded satisfactory linear correlations for the results of many electrophilic substitutions, the slopes of the correlations giving the values of the reaction constants. If the existence of linear free energy relationships in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were not in dispute, the above procedure would suffice, and the precision of the correlation would measure the usefulness of the p+cr+ equation. However, a point at issue was whether the effect of a substituent could be represented by a constant, or whether its nature depended on the specific reaction. To investigate the effect of a particular substituent in different reactions, the values for the various reactions of the logarithms of the partial rate factors for the substituent were plotted against the p+ values of the reactions. This procedure should show more readily whether the effect of a substituent depends on the reaction, in which case deviations from a hnear relationship would occur. It was concluded that any variation in substituent effects was random, and not a function of electron demand by the electrophile. ... 

Deactivating substituent (Sections 12 11 and 12 13) A group that when present in place of hydrogen causes a particular reaction to occur more slowly The term is most often ap plied to the effect of substituents on the rate of electrophilic aromatic substitution... 

We will address this issue further in Chapter 10, where the polar effects of the substituents on both the c and n electrons will be considered. For the case of electrophilic aromatic substitution, where the energetics of interaction of an approaching electrophile with the 7t system determines both the rate of reaction and position of substitution, simple resonance arguments are extremely useful. 

Aromatic compounds react with mercuric salts to give arylmercury compounds.69 Mercuric acetate or mercuric trifluoroacetate are the usual reagents.70 The reaction shows substituent effects that are characteristic of electrophilic aromatic substitution.71 Mercuration is one of the few electrophilic aromatic substitutions in which proton loss from the a complex is rate determining. Mercuration of benzene shows an isotope effect kB/kD = 6,72 which indicates that the [Pg.1026]

The effect of monofluorination on alkene or aromatic reactivity toward electrophiles is more difficult to predict Although a-fluonne stabilizes a carbocation relative to hydrogen, its opposing inductive effect makes olefins and aromatics more electron deficient. Fluorine therefore is activating only for electrophilic reactions with very late transition states where its resonance stabilization is maximized The faster rate of addition of trifluoroacetic acid and sulfuric acid to 2-fluoropropene vs propene is an example [775,116], but cases of such enhanced fluoroalkene reactivity in solution are quite rare [127] By contrast, there are many examples where the ortho-para-dueeting fluorine substituent is also activating in electrophilic aromatic substitutions [128]... 

Now that we have determined that the intermediate in electrophilic aromatic substitution is usually a a complex (see, however, p. 394), let us return to a consideration of Reaction 7.76. Two factors probably combine to cause the observed isotope effect and base catalysis. First, the strong electron-donating groups stabilize the intermediate 76 (Equation 7.77) and make departure of the proton more difficult than proton loss in many other electrophilic substitutions. [Remember, however, that k1 < k2 (see p. 386).] Second, steric interactions between the large diazonium group and the nearby substituents increase the rate... 

---