Electronic structural model problems

Part 2, Model Chemistries, provides an in-depth examination of the accuracy, scope of applicability and other characteristics and trade-offs of all of the major well-defined electronic structure models. It also gives some general recommendations for selecting the best model for investigating a particular problem. 

In this, the last major chapter of the book, we turn our attention to the applications of modern electronic structure models and eoncepts to more general geochemical problems namely, those described by Goldschmidt as being eoncerned with the distribution of elements in the geochemical spheres and the laws governing the distribution of the elements (see Preface). 

In the framework of QM/MM junction construction we should determine the structure of boundary one-electron states and their responses to variations of geometric parameters. The problem of constructing optimal boundary HOs is closely related to the more general problem of deduction of the MM description from some consistent QM description of electronic structure. This problem is actual since the form of the force fields and their particular sets of parameters are not justified that leads to a great variety of different MM schemes. The semiempirical APSLG-MINDO/3 method briefly described above is a perfect candidate for the MM derivation and it was successfully used for this purpose in Refs. [93, 94]. Here we describe the main steps of the MM derivation and their consequences for the QM/MM modelling. 

How are fiindamental aspects of surface reactions studied The surface science approach uses a simplified system to model the more complicated real-world systems. At the heart of this simplified system is the use of well defined surfaces, typically in the fonn of oriented single crystals. A thorough description of these surfaces should include composition, electronic structure and geometric structure measurements, as well as an evaluation of reactivity towards different adsorbates. Furthemiore, the system should be constructed such that it can be made increasingly more complex to more closely mimic macroscopic systems. However, relating surface science results to the corresponding real-world problems often proves to be a stumbling block because of the sheer complexity of these real-world systems. 

This Introductory Section was intended to provide the reader with an overview of the structure of quantum mechanics and to illustrate its application to several exactly solvable model problems. The model problems analyzed play especially important roles in chemistry because they form the basis upon which more sophisticated descriptions of the electronic structure and rotational-vibrational motions of molecules are built. The variational method and perturbation theory constitute the tools needed to make use of solutions of... 

In this section, the conceptual framework of molecular orbital theory is developed. Applications are presented and problems are given and solved within qualitative and semi-empirical models of electronic structure. Ab Initio approaches to these same matters, whose solutions require the use of digital computers, are treated later in Section 6. Semi-empirical methods, most of which also require access to a computer, are treated in this section and in Appendix F. 

There are problems for which MP2 theory fails as well, however. In general, the more unusual the electronic structure a system has, the higher level of theory that will be needed to model it accurately. 

The capacity to solve novel problems by constructing analogies to already-used visualisations. (Gilbert, 2008). For example, using Kepler s model of the Solar System to explain the electronic structure of an atom, in the manner of Bohr, and hence being able to predict, very approximately, the absorption spectram that it will produce. 

The determination of the electronic structure of lanthanide-doped materials and the prediction of the optical properties are not trivial tasks. The standard ligand field models lack predictive power and undergoes parametric uncertainty at low symmetry, while customary computation methods, such as DFT, cannot be used in a routine manner for ligand field on lanthanide accounts. The ligand field density functional theory (LFDFT) algorithm23-30 consists of a customized conduct of nonempirical DFT calculations, extracting reliable parameters that can be used in further numeric experiments, relevant for the prediction in luminescent materials science.31 These series of parameters, which have to be determined in order to analyze the problem of two-open-shell 4f and 5d electrons in lanthanide materials, are as follows. 

The electronic structure method used to provide the energies and gradients of the states is crucial in photochemistry and photophysics. Ab initio electronic structure methods have been used for many years. Treating closed shell systems in their ground state is a problem that, in many cases, can now be solved routinely by chemists using standardized methods and computer packages. In order to obtain quantitative results, electron correlation (also referred to as dynamical correlation) should be included in the model and there are many methods available for doing this based on either variational or perturbation principles [41],... 

The most obvious defect of the Thomas-Fermi model is the neglect of interaction between electrons, but even in the most advanced modern methods this interaction still presents the most difficult problem. The most useful practical procedure to calculate the electronic structure of complex atoms is by means of the Hartree-Fock procedure, which is not by solution of the atomic wave equation, but by iterative numerical procedures, based on the hydrogen model. In this method the exact Hamiltonian is replaced by... 

The effect of solvent environment on the chemical reactivity is well known. However, it is a challenging problem for theoretical chemists to predict the effect of the solvent on the chemical reactivity. With the confidence gained in understanding the chemical reaction mechanism in vacuum using various electronic structure calculation methods, several attempts have been made to probe the reactivity in solvent medium. The success of solvation models in predicting the SN2 reactions in solvent environments is illustrated [8-11,38]. 

An answer to the problem of determining the electronic structure in the ground state of cyclophosphazenes (NPX2)n has been supplied by a concerted use of quantum chemistry (79) and the Faraday effect (20), the results of which unambiguously support Dewar s island model (18). 

In contrast to the symmetry requirements, the virial theorem is a dynamical requirement and, with the exception of atoms, can only be tested once the solution of the variational problem has been carried through. Or, to be a little more cautious, the imposition of the virial theorem on the form of a model of the molecular electronic structure is not easy. (It should be said at this point that the simple form,... 

Little theoretical work has been done on the electronic structure of a solid with a free surface. The main contributions are those of Tamm (4), Shockley (5), Goodwin 6), Artmann (7), and Kouteck (5), and the main conclusion is that, in certain circumstances, surface states may exist in the gaps between the normal bands of crystal states. In this section we investigate the problem in the simplest way. The solid is represented by a straight chain of similar atoms, and its two ends represent the free surfaces. This one-dimensional model exhibits the essential features of the problem, and the results are easily generalized to three dimensions. 

So far we have assumed that the electronic structure of the crystal consists of one band derived, in our approximation, from a single atomic state. In general, this will not be a realistic picture. The metals, for example, have a complicated system of overlapping bands derived, in our approximation, from several atomic states. This means that more than one atomic orbital has to be associated with each crystal atom. When this is done, it turns out that even the equations for the one-dimensional crystal cannot be solved directly. However, the mathematical technique developed by Baldock (2) and Koster and Slater (S) can be applied (8) and a formal solution obtained. Even so, the question of the existence of otherwise of surface states in real crystals is diflBcult to answer from theoretical considerations. For the simplest metals, i.e., the alkali metals, for which a one-band model is a fair approximation, the problem is still difficult. The nature of the difficulty can be seen within the framework of our simple model. In the first place, the effective one-electron Hamiltonian operator is really different for each electron. If we overlook this complication and use some sort of mean value for this operator, the operator still contains terms representing the interaction of the considered electron with all other electrons in the crystal. The Coulomb part of this interaction acts in such a way as to reduce the effect of the perturbation introduced by the existence of a free surface. A self-consistent calculation is therefore essential, and the various parameters in our theory would have to be chosen in conformity with the results of such a calculation. 

---