Electronic spectroscopy, surface structure

For example, Pt single crystals have been cleaved to expose various surfaces exhibiting steps, kinks, and terraces, as shown in Fig. 1. The surfaces have been rigorously cleaned in a vacuum chamber, their compositions determined by Auger electron spectroscopy, their structures determined by LEED, and their catalytic activities measured for reactions of w-heptane. The results demonstrate the structure sensitivity of the hydro-genolysis reaction, which is associated with kink sites, and the structure insensitivity of the dehydrogenation and isomerization reactions. The structures illustrate the nonuniformity that is typical of catalyst surfaces. The sites at which catalysis occurs are called active centers, and these may be a small fraction of the surface they are usually unidentified. 

The Structure of the Metal-Vacuum Interface The Study of Simple Consecutive Processes in Electrochemical Reactions Surface Analysis by Electron Spectroscopy Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS Surface Potential at Liquid Interfaces Surface States on Semiconductors... 

Further structural information is available from physical methods of surface analysis such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron or Auger electron spectroscopy (XPS), or secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), and transmission or reflectance IR and UV/VIS spectroscopy. The application of both electroanalytical and surface spectroscopic methods has been thoroughly reviewed and appropriate methods are given in most of the references of this chapter. 

This series covers recent advances in electrocatalysis and electrochemistry and depicts prospects for their contribution into the present and future of the industrial world. It illustrates the transition of electrochemical sciences from a solid chapter of physical electrochemistry (covering mainly electron transfer reactions, concepts of electrode potentials and stmcture of the electrical double layer) to the field in which electrochemical reactivity is shown as a unique chapter of heterogeneous catalysis, is supported by high-level theory, connects to other areas of science, and includes focus on electrode surface structure, reaction environment, and interfacial spectroscopy. 

Electrochemical processes are always heterogeneous and confined to the electrochemical interface between a solid electrode and a liquid electrolyte (in this chapter always aqueous). The knowledge of the actual composition of the electrode surface, of its electronic and geometric structure, is of particular importance when interpreting electrochemical experiments. This information cannot be obtained by classical electrochemical techniques. Monitoring the surface composition before, during and after electrochemical reactions will support the mechanism derived for the process. This is of course true for any surface sensitive spectroscopy. Each technique, however, has its own spectrum of information and only a combination of different surface spectroscopies and electrochemical experiments will come up with an almost complete picture of the electrochemical interface. XPS is just one of these techniques. 

As mentioned previously, this can be attributed in part to the lack of structure-sensitive techniques that can operate in the presence of a condensed phase. Ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) surface spectroscopic techniques such as low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and others have been applied to the study of electrochemical interfaces, and a wealth of information has emerged from these ex situ studies on well-defined electrode surfaces.15"17 However, the fact that these techniques require the use of UHV precludes their use for in situ studies of the electrode/solution interface. In addition, transfer of the electrode from the electrolytic medium into UHV introduces the very serious question of whether the nature of the surface examined ex situ has the same structure as the surface in contact with the electrolyte and under potential control. Furthermore, any information on the solution side of the interface is, of necessity, lost. 

XPS has typically been regarded primarily as a surface characterization technique. Indeed, angle-resolved XPS studies can be very informative in revealing the surface structure of solids, as demonstrated for the oxidation of Hf(Sio.sAso.5)As. However, with proper sample preparation, the electronic structure of the bulk solid can be obtained. A useful adjunct to XPS is X-ray absorption spectroscopy, which probes the bulk of the solid. If trends in the XPS BEs parallel those in absorption energies, then we can be reasonably confident that they represent the intrinsic properties of the solid. Features in XANES spectra such as pre-edge and absorption edge intensities can also provide qualitative information about the occupation of electronic states. 

The adiabatic picture developed above, based on the BO approximation, is basic to our understanding of much of chemistry and molecular physics. For example, in spectroscopy the adiabatic picture is one of well-defined spectral bands, one for each electronic state. The structure of each band is then due to the shape of the molecule and the nuclear motions allowed by the potential surface. This is in general what is seen in absorption and photoelectron spectroscopy. There are, however, occasions when the picture breaks down, and non-adiabatic effects must be included to give a faithful description of a molecular system [160-163],... 

---