Electron pair acceptor derivatives

Lewis acids are defined as molecules that act as electron-pair acceptors. The proton is an important special case, but many other species can play an important role in the catalysis of organic reactions. The most important in organic reactions are metal cations and covalent compounds of metals. Metal cations that play prominent roles as catalysts include the alkali-metal monocations Li+, Na+, K+, Cs+, and Rb+, divalent ions such as Mg +, Ca +, and Zn, marry of the transition-metal cations, and certain lanthanides. The most commonly employed of the covalent compounds include boron trifluoride, aluminum chloride, titanium tetrachloride, and tin tetrachloride. Various other derivatives of boron, aluminum, and titanium also are employed as Lewis acid catalysts. 

It was G. N. Lewis who extended the definitions of acids and bases still further, the underlying concept being derived from the electronic theory of valence. It provided a much broader definition of acids and bases than that provided by the Lowry-Bronsted concept, as it furnished explanations not in terms of ionic reactions but in terms of bond formation. According to this theory, an acid is any species that is capable of accepting a pair of electrons to establish a coordinate bond, whilst a base is any species capable of donating a pair of electrons to form such a coordinate bond. A Lewis acid is an electron pair acceptor, while a Lewis base is an electron pair donor. These definitions of acids and bases fit the Lowry-Bronsted and Arrhenius theories, and cover many other substances which could not be classified as acids or bases in terms of proton transfer. 

The chemical properties of indium are typical of those of Group 13 of the Periodic Table. Most of indium s oxides, salts, and compounds involve the +3 oxidation state (e.g., In203, In[N03]3> and InCl3) many of these compounds are electron-pair acceptors, forming addition compounds with donor molecules (e.g., InBr3 py, py = pyridine). Neutral, cationic, and anionic complexes are also known. Several interesting compounds are derived from the +1 and +2 oxidation states of the element. 

The strong electron-pair acceptor acid, BI3, and its organic derivatives RBI2 and R2BI, react with chainlike sulfur compounds as well as with all sulfur allotropes under mild conditions, e.g., from Ss and BI3 the trithiadiborolane system is formed with I2 ... 

Charge transfer forces involve the movement of electrons or protons from one molecule to another. Electron pair donor - electron pair acceptor complexes (EPD-EPA) result from the donation of a pair of electrons giving rise to electrostatic attraction between two charged species. The difference between this type of bond and a normal chemical bond is that both bonding electrons are derived from the same molecule (the EPD), the role of the EPA being to provide an empty orbital. It is important not to confuse the EPD-EPA complex with ion pair formation resulting from proton transfer [34],... 

Polymer formation can occur through a variety of reactions. Metallocene polyamides, polyethers, polyesters, polyhydrazides and polyurethanes have been synthesized through condensation reactions of 1,1 -difunctional metallocenes (typically ferrocene derivatives) with diacid halides (if the metallocene derivative contains functional electron-pair donor bases) and electron-pair donor bases (as diamines, hydrazines, diisocyanates, diols) if the metallocene derivative contains functional electron-pair acceptor acids . 

This paper reviews the chemistry of metalloborane derivatives that contain borane or heteroatom borane groups which function as monohapto ligands. These compounds can be divided into three classes according to the number of electrons formally donated by the borane ligand to the metal. The electron pair acceptor class, represented by the compound Na[(OC)5Mn BHg], has received little attention thus far. The one-electron donor class, exemplified by the complex, l,2-(CH3)2-3- (C5H5)Fe(CO)2]-BioC2Ho, has a rich chemistry of metal-carbon and metal-boron derivatives. The third class includes two-electron donor derivatives that are represented by the compound (CHs)f,N[7,8-BoHioCHP - CrfCO),]. 

Subsequent to the landmark 2011 paper of Hey-Hawkins et al. [1], there have been many papers published on the subject of intermolecular interactions through the formation of pnicogen bonds [2-32]. This bond arises when a pnicogen atom (N, P, As) acts as a Lewis acid by accepting a pair of electrons from a Lewis base. When two pnicogen atoms participate in forming a bond, each acts as both an electron-pair acceptor and an electron-pair donor. Most studies of pnicogen bonds have involved the PH3 molecule and its derivatives. 

Chemical Properties The formation of salts with acids is the most characteristic reaction of amines. Since the amines are soluble in organic solvents and the salts are usually not soluble, acidic products can be conveniendy separated by the reaction with an amine, the unshared electron pair on the amine nitrogen acting as proton acceptor. Amines are good nucleophiles reactions of amines at the nitrogen atom have as a first step the formation of a bond with the unshared electron pair of nitrogen, eg, reactions with acid anhydrides, haUdes, and esters, with carbon dioxide or carbon disulfide, and with isocyanic or isothiocyanic acid derivatives. 

Stannylenes are in the first place Lewis acids (electron acceptors) as can be easily derived from the structures of the solids (Chapter 3). When no Lewis bases (electron donors) are present, they may also act as Lewis bases via their non-bonding electron pair (see polymerization of organic stannylenes). 

V,/V-dimethylaniline, especially when those strong donors are paired with the relatively electron-poor MES derivative of the bis(arene)iron(ll) acceptor. As such, the dark reactions arise via essentially the same multistep mechanism as that for charge-transfer de-ligation, the difference arising from an adiabatic electron transfer (10) as the initial step that is thermally allowed when the driving force -AGET is sufficient to surmount... 

The polarity alternation rule (PAR) considers two kinds of substituents. The donors are. those having unshared electronic pairs or -electrons, and +1 groups. These include OH, OR, OCOR, NH2, NRR, N(R)COR, SH, SR, halogens and alkyl groups. The donor properties of the alkyl groups may reflect the existence of hyperconjugation. On the other hand, the acceptors are electron sinks, i.e. polarizable it-bonds, atoms with empty orbitals, and —I groups. Examples of acceptors are C=0 (aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acid derivatives), CN, S02, N02, SiRj. 

Carbene complexes of transition metals [2,21,225-236] are typical representatives of compounds with a double metal-carbon bond. They are seen as derivatives of a two-covalent carbon in their singlet state [226,232,236]. As a rule, the carbene ligand is an effective a-donor and a comparatively weak n-acceptor. Formation of a cr-bond M — C takes place via transference of a nonbonding electronic pair with a nucleophilic a-orbital of the carbenic carbon to the metal atom. Simultaneously, it is also possible to form a 7t-bond as a result of the interaction of symmetrically appropriate metallic d-AO with a vacant electrophilic /7-orbital of the carbene [236,237], This situation is a key factor that determines the polarization of most of the carbene complexes according to type 145 (Fig. 2.6). 

In several photochemical electron transfer reactions, addition products are observed between the donor and acceptor molecules. However, the formation of these products does not necessarily involve direct coupling of the radical ion pair. Instead, many of these reactions proceed via proton transfer from the radical cation to the radical anion, followed by coupling of the donor derived radical with an acceptor derived intermediate. For example, 1,4-dicyanobenzene and various other cyanoaromatic acceptors react with 2,3-dimethylbutene to give aromatic substitution products, most likely formed via an addition-elimination sequence [140]. 

The synthesis of tripyrazolylmethane and similar reactions of N-magnesium bromide derivatives of pyrazoles (see below) show that the reactive center cannot be transferred from nitrogen to the a-position of the ring as with pyrrole.719-722 Unlike the CH-group of triphenyl-methane, that in tri-l-pyrazolylmethane is not labile.719 The 1-pyrazolyl group is presumably a weaker electron acceptor than a phenyl group because the electron pair of the 1-nitrogen atom is not completely withdrawn into the aromatic system. 

Photochemical electron transfer reactions of electron donor-acceptor pairs in polar solvents provide a convenient and effective method for the generation of radical cations which can be trapped by complex metal hydrides. One of the most effective systems is based on irradiation of a solution of substrate, sodium borohydride and 1,4- or 1,3-dicyanobenzene. A range of bi- and poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons has been converted into the dihydro derivatives in this way. An especially important aspect of this route to dihydroaromatic compounds is that it may give access to products which are regioisomeric with the standard Birch reduction products. Thus, o-xylene is converted into the 1,4-dihydro product (229) rather than the normal 3,6-dihydro isomer (228). The m- and p-xylenes are similarly reduced to (230) and (231), respectively. ... 

A recent study on the reactivity of the parent benzo-l,2-dithiolan-3-one 1-oxide 79a (R = R = H) and o- and /i-substituted derivatives 79b-g with -propyl thiol in acetone/water mixture (7/3) was prompted (Table 5) by the observation that the DNA-cleaving activity and antitumor activity of leinamycin 5 depends, in part <2005JOC6968>, on initial thiol attack on its l,3-dioxo-l,2-dithiolane functionality. Experimental results have proved that the presence of chlorine as an electron acceptor in the /i ra-position relative to the sulfmyl sulfur S-1 of precursor 79e and ortho-substituents with lone electron pairs in the case of precursors 79b and 79d are responsible for increased product formation of polysulfanes 80 and 81. A rationale in terms of substituent effects, operating through-space and through-bond of the intermediates a and b, respectively, was suggested. In other words, the reaction is favored by ortho-substituents with lone pair electrons next to the dithiolanone-oxide (S-1) reaction center or a decrease of the electron density at the /i ra-position. 

---