Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron density approach

To describe the d-orbital splitting effect for the octahedral field, one should imagine ligand spheres of electron density approaching along the x, y, and z axes, where the dxi yi and di lobes of electron density point. Figure 1.5 illustrates representations of high-probability electron orbit surfaces for the five d orbitals. [Pg.13]

Compared to computational approaches based on the g-electron density, approaches based on the g-electron reduced density matrix have the advantage that the kinetic energy functional can be written in an explicit form ... [Pg.448]

Accordingly, it follows that both electronic density approaches have their own parametric dependency. This implies that also the computed electronegativity will feature the scaling effect on the electronic density raised due to the one effective valence electronic approach. With this assumption at the background of density computation we should recover in the provided electronegativity the real (many) electronic valence state by an adequate nomination of the specific values for the P and q parameters. [Pg.283]

Time was of the essence in our struggle. The two interlinked bottlenecks in the electron density approach were time dependence and excited states. We first developed a rigorous time-dependent density functional theory for a certain class of potentials by utilizing QFD. Since this version of density functional theory was not exact for all potentials, we also developed a similar approach in terms of natural orbitals which are exact in principle. This approach yielded an equation for the ground state density whose accuracy was very good. Using this, we calculated the frequency-dependent multipole (2 -pole, Z = 1, 2, 3, 4) polarizabilities of atoms. Some of these computed numbers still await experimental verification. [Pg.481]

The plane of the edge of electron density approaches the (bulk) metal side with increasing q, i.e., the metal electron capacity contribution decreases. Agreement with experiment has been claimed with regard to the experimentally known appreciable difference between the compact-layer capacitance at Hg and Ga at q = 0. However, Feldman et al. (1986) regard this apparent agreement as an artifact of the choice of the jellium edge positions at these two metals. [Pg.335]

VV e now wish to establish the general functional form of possible wavefunctions for the two electrons in this pseudo helium atom. We will do so by considering first the spatial part of the u a efunction. We will show how to derive functional forms for the wavefunction in which the i change of electrons is independent of the electron labels and does not affect the electron density. The simplest approach is to assume that each wavefunction for the helium atom is the product of the individual one-electron solutions. As we have just seen, this implies that the total energy is equal to the sum of the one-electron orbital energies, which is not correct as ii ignores electron-electron repulsion. Nevertheless, it is a useful illustrative model. The wavefunction of the lowest energy state then has each of the two electrons in a Is orbital ... [Pg.57]

R F W Bader s theory of atoms in molecules [Bader 1985] provides an alternative way to partition the electrons between the atoms in a molecule. Bader s theory has been applied to many different problems, but for the purposes of our present discussion we will concentrate on its use in partitioning electron density. The Bader approach is based upon the concept of a gradient vector path, which is a cuiwe around the molecule such that it is always perpendicular to the electron density contours. A set of gradient paths is drawn in Figure 2.14 for formamide. As can be seen, some of the gradient paths terminate at the atomic nuclei. Other gradient paths are attracted to points (called critical points) that are... [Pg.100]

There are some recent examples of this type of synthesis of pyridazines, but this approach is more valuable for cinnolines. Alkyl and aryl ketazines can be transformed with lithium diisopropylamide into their dianions, which rearrange to tetrahydropyridazines, pyrroles or pyrazoles, depending on the nature of the ketazlne. It is postulated that the reaction course is mainly dependent on the electron density on the carbon termini bearing anionic charges (Scheme 65) (78JOC3370). [Pg.42]

An alternative approach is in terms of frontier electron densities. In electrophilic substitution, the frontier electron density is taken as the electron density in the highest filled MO. In nucleophilic substitution the frontier orbital is taken as the lowest vacant MO the frontier electron density at a carbon atom is then the electron density that would be present in this MO if it were occupied by two electrons. Both electrophilic and nucleophilic substitution thus occur at the carbon atom with the greatest appropriate frontier electron density. [Pg.6]

The significance of frontier electron densities is limited to the orientation of substitution for a given aromatic system, but this approach has been developed to give two more complex reactivity indices termed superdelocalizabilities and Z values, which indicate the relative reactivities of different aromatic systems. [Pg.6]

In the 1,2,4-thiadiazole ring the electron density at the 5-position is markedly lower than at the 3-position, and this affects substituent reactions. 5-Halogeno derivatives, for example, approach the reactivity of 4-halogenopyrimidines. The 1,2,4-oxadiazole ring shows a similar difference between the 3- and 5-positions. [Pg.83]

The comparison with experiment can be made at several levels. The first, and most common, is in the comparison of derived quantities that are not directly measurable, for example, a set of average crystal coordinates or a diffusion constant. A comparison at this level is convenient in that the quantities involved describe directly the structure and dynamics of the system. However, the obtainment of these quantities, from experiment and/or simulation, may require approximation and model-dependent data analysis. For example, to obtain experimentally a set of average crystallographic coordinates, a physical model to interpret an electron density map must be imposed. To avoid these problems the comparison can be made at the level of the measured quantities themselves, such as diffraction intensities or dynamic structure factors. A comparison at this level still involves some approximation. For example, background corrections have to made in the experimental data reduction. However, fewer approximations are necessary for the structure and dynamics of the sample itself, and comparison with experiment is normally more direct. This approach requires a little more work on the part of the computer simulation team, because methods for calculating experimental intensities from simulation configurations must be developed. The comparisons made here are of experimentally measurable quantities. [Pg.238]

Another approach to calculating molecular geometry and energy is based on density functional theory (DFT). DFT focuses on the electron cloud corresponding to a molecule. The energy of a molecule is uniquely specified by the electron density functional. The calculation involves the construction of an expression for the electron density. The energy of the system is then expressed as... [Pg.59]

We have extended the linear combination of Gaussian-type orbitals local-density functional approach to calculate the total energies and electronic structures of helical chain polymers[35]. This method was originally developed for molecular systems[36-40], and extended to two-dimensionally periodic sys-tems[41,42] and chain polymers[34j. The one-electron wavefunctions here are constructed from a linear combination of Bloch functions c>>, which are in turn constructed from a linear combination of nuclear-centered Gaussian-type orbitals Xylr) (in ihis case, products of Gaussians and the real solid spherical harmonics). The one-electron density matrix is given by... [Pg.42]


See other pages where Electron density approach is mentioned: [Pg.638]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.2585]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.2585]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.2213]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.212]   


SEARCH



Electronic Approach

Molecular electron density Lego approach

© 2024 chempedia.info