Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrode surfaces distribution near

Cell geometry, such as tab/terminal positioning and battery configuration, strongly influence primary current distribution. The monopolar constmction is most common. Several electrodes of the same polarity may be connected in parallel to increase capacity. The current production concentrates near the tab connections unless special care is exercised in designing the current collector. Bipolar constmction, wherein the terminal or collector of one cell serves as the anode and cathode of the next cell in pile formation, leads to gready improved uniformity of current distribution. Several representations are available to calculate the current distribution across the geometric electrode surface (46—50). [Pg.514]

Thermal motion of the ions in the EDL was included in the theories developed independently by Georges Gouy in Erance (1910) and David L. Chapman in England (1913). The combined elfects of the electrostatic forces and of the thermal motion in the solution near the electrode surface give rise to a diffuse distribution of the excess ions, and a diffuse EDL part or diffuse ionic layer with a space charge Qy x) (depending on the distance x from the electrode s surface) is formed. The total excess charge in the solution per unit surface area is determined by the expression... [Pg.151]

The concentration change near the electrode surface gradually reaches solution layers farther away from the electrode. In these layer the rate of concentration change is the same as at the electrode, but there is a time lag. The concentration distributions found at different times are shown in Fig. 11.3. The diffusion-layer thickness 5. gradually increases with time it follows from Eqs. (11.3) and (11.6) that... [Pg.184]

In acidic media, the reactivity of ethanol on Au electrodes is much lower than in alkaline media. The main product of the oxidation of ethanol on Au in an acidic electrolyte was found to be acetaldehyde, with small amounts of acetic acid [Tremiliosi-FiUio et al., 1998]. The different reactivities and the product distributions in different media were explained by considering the interactions between the active sites on Au, ethanol, and active oxygen species absorbed on or near the electrode surface. In acidic media, surface hydroxide concentrations are low, leading to relatively slow dehydrogenation of ethanol to form acetaldehyde as the main oxidation pathway. In contrast, in alkaline media, ethanol, adsorbed as an ethoxy species, reacts with a surface hydroxide, forming adsorbed acetate, leading to acetate (acetic acid) as the main reaction product. [Pg.195]

The position of a reference electrode for the RHSE is not as crucial as for the rotating disk electrode because of the uniform potential distribution near the surface. To minimize the flow disturbances which might be introduced by a reference capillary, it is advisable to place the reference tip near the equator rather than near the pole of rotation. For a reference electrode located at a large distance from the RHSE, the ohmic potential drop may be estimated from Eq. (57) as (47) ... [Pg.192]

The distribution of potential in TC is practically the same as that near the flat surface if the electrolyte concentration is about 1 mol/1 [2], So the discharge of TC may be considered as that of a double electric layer formed at the flat electrode surface/electrolyte solution interface, and hence, an equivalent circuit for the TC discharge may be presented as an RC circuit, where C is the double layer capacitance and R is the electrolyte resistance. [Pg.76]

In electrochemistry, potential and current measured by electroanalytical methods provide kinetic and potential energy pictures of electrochemical reactions. Measured current and potential are strongly connected to the molecular scale properties of the electrode surface, solvent molecules and ions. Currents and potentials represent how molecules and atoms are distributed near the interface, how they are bonded on the electrode surface, and how they are solvated in the electrolyte solution. The electrochemical properties are also sensitive to the atomic arrangements of the electrode surface crystallographic orientations and defects. [Pg.448]

Formation or consumption of reacting species at the electrode surface causes concentration distribution of electroactive species in the solution phase during electrolysis. Equi-concentration contours stand for a concentration profile. A concentration profile can be measured by detecting current or potential by use of a small probe electrode at various locations near a target large electrode. A typical method is scanning electrochemical microscopy. See also diffusion layer, - scanning electrochemical microscope. [Pg.153]

An important example of the system with an ideally permeable external interface is the diffusion of an electroactive species across the boundary layer in solution near the solid electrode surface, described within the framework of the Nernst diffusion layer model. Mathematically, an equivalent problem appears for the diffusion of a solute electroactive species to the electrode surface across a passive membrane layer. The non-stationary distribution of this species inside the layer corresponds to a finite - diffusion problem. Its solution for the film with an ideally permeable external boundary and with the concentration modulation at the electrode film contact in the course of the passage of an alternating current results in one of two expressions for finite-Warburg impedance for the contribution of the layer Ziayer = H(0) tanh(icard)1/2/(iwrd)1/2 containing the characteristic - diffusion time, Td = L2/D (L, layer thickness, D, - diffusion coefficient), and the low-frequency resistance of the layer, R(0) = dE/dl, this derivative corresponding to -> direct current conditions. [Pg.681]

In an improved model (1) it is assumed that the ions are distributed in the electrolyte in a space charge layer near the electrode surface. The distribution of the ions and the corresponding potential are ruled by Boltzmann statistics and the Poisson equation. [Pg.226]

Radial distributions of electron temperature and electron density are compared at axial distance 2.5 mm and 7.5 mm, respectively, in Figures 15.16 and 15.17. In DC discharge of Ar without magnetron, the distributions of electron temperature and electron density near the electrode surface (2.5 mm from the cathode) are uniform, but both show the edge effect, more pronounced in electron temperature. At this position (in cathode dark region), there are small numbers of electrons that have low electron energy. [Pg.317]

The local current density on an electrode is a function of the position on the electrode surface. The current distribution over an electrode surface is complicated. Current will tend to concentrate at edges and points, and unless the resistance of the solution is very low, it will flow to the workpieces near the opposite electrode more readily than to the more distant work-pieces. It is desired to operate processes with uniform current distribution. That is, the current density is the same at all points on the electrode surface. [Pg.841]

Fig. 6.19 Distribution of energy states of Fe(H20)6 - near an InP electrode surface (heavy curves show DOS with water present). The figure shows the distribution of d orbitals of the redox molecules which are located within a distance of 4 A from a (100) InP surface. (After ref. [24])... Fig. 6.19 Distribution of energy states of Fe(H20)6 - near an InP electrode surface (heavy curves show DOS with water present). The figure shows the distribution of d orbitals of the redox molecules which are located within a distance of 4 A from a (100) InP surface. (After ref. [24])...
Primary current and potential distribution [84], This analysis is applicable at low-current densities where concentration variations near the electrode surface are neglected and the electrode reaction is reversible. The potential (<1>) distribution in solution is governed by Laplace s equation,... [Pg.1789]

The use of experimental physics and the implementation of new theoretical concepts and methods from solid-state physics or statistical mechanics to electrochemistry contributed to the development of surface electrochemistry. This was particularly important for a better understanding of the electric double layer or, more generally speaking, of the solvent structure near a charged metal (by shifting the Fermi level upward or downward). Important results came from computer simulations of the electric double layer that yielded new information about the spatial distribution of ions and water molecules toward the electrode surface [30]. [Pg.229]

In the following, we present a simple particle displacement analysis for various AC electrokinetic effects. Assuming co-planar parallel interdigitated electrodes, the electric field between two electrodes can be assumed as half-circular lines near the electrode surface. Various electrokinetic forces can be represented in simple analytical forms using this simplified electric field distribution. [Pg.275]

In the preceding sections, we have discussed nonspecific adsorption, where long-range electrostatic forces perturb the distribution of ions near the electrode surface, and specific adsorption, where a strong interaction between the adsorbate and the electrode material causes the formation of a layer (partial or complete) on the electrode surface. The difference between nonspecific and specific adsorption is analogous to the difference between the presence of an ion in the ionic atmosphere of another, oppositely charged, ion in solution (e.g., as modeled by the Debye-Huckel theory) and the formation of a bond between the two solution species (as in a complexation reaction). [Pg.563]

A subsequent description by Bockris and associates drew attention to further complexities as shown in Figure 15. The metal surface now is covered by combinations of oriented structured water dipoles, specifically adsorbed anions, followed by secondary water dipoles along with the hydrated cation structures. This model serves to bring attention to the dynamic situation in which changes in potential involve sequential as well as simultaneous responses of molecular and atomic systems at and near an electrode surface. Changes in potential distribution involve interactions extending from atom polarizability, through dipole orientation, to ion movements. The electrical field effects are complex in this ideal polarized electrode model. [Pg.21]

The zero-kinetics limit has been applied to the situation where re-equilibration in concentration gradients near the electrode surface is neglected [54,55]. Thus, the exit rate for a partitioned probe is zero, and the distribution of probe far from the electrode is maintained (in absolute amount) in the diffusion layer at the electrode surface. In the... [Pg.661]


See other pages where Electrode surfaces distribution near is mentioned: [Pg.404]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.1016]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.20]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.174 ]




SEARCH



Electrode surface

Surface distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info