Electrode potential reverse-current mechanism

This chapter outlines the basic aspects of interfacial electrochemical polarization and their relevance to corrosion. A discussion of the theoretical aspects of electrode kinetics lays a foundation for the understanding of the electrochemical nature of corrosion. Topics include mixed potential theory, reversible electrode potential, exchange current density, corrosion potential, corrosion current, and Tafel slopes. The theoretical treatment of electrochemistry in this chapter is focused on electrode kinetics, polarization behavior, mass transfer effects, and their relevance to corrosion. Analysis and solved corrosion problems are designed to understand the mechanisms of corrosion processes, learn how to control corrosion rates, and evaluate the protection strategies at the metal-solution interface [1-7]. 

In the case when the preceding chemical reaction occurs at a rate of the same order as the intervention time scale of cyclic voltammetry, the repercussions of the chemical complication on the potential of the electrode process are virtually negligible, whereas there is a significant effect on the current. In particular, it is characteristic of this mechanism that the forward current decreases with the scan rate much more than the reverse current. This implies that the current ratio ipr/ipf is always greater than 1, increasing as scan rates are increased. 

This relationship is a very important general finding. It says that, for a kinetically facile system, the electrode potential and the surface concentrations of the initial reactant and the final product are in local nemstian balance at all times, regardless of the details of the mechanism linking these species and regardless of current flow. Like (3.5.17), (3.5.21) was derived for pre- and postreactions that involve net charge transfer, but one can easily generalize the derivation to include other patterns. The essential requirement is that all steps be chemically reversible and possess facile kinetics. 

In the case of a reaction occurring at two different inert electrodes with the same mechanism, at any potential the ratio of the rates will be equal to the ratio of the exchange currents i.e., the practical potential of comparison is clearly the reversible potential, of the over all reaction. The situation becomes a little more complicated if the mechanism of the same over-all reaction is different on various substrates. Then, depending on the value of overpotential, one or the other substrate is a better catalyst from the practical point of view, as is illustrated in Fig. 13. 

So far, the most popular solution for this problem has been to sample the current in SCV not at the end of the pulse but at an appropriate time (sampling time, ts) so that the SCV voltammogram is equivalent to the CV one. The optimal value for the sampling time depends on the experimental system (electrode kinetics, reaction mechanism, step potential, etc.) and it has been established for some frequent situations. For example, for a reversible E mechanism at a macroelectrode there is an acceptable agreement between SCV and CV for Ea [Pg.81]

The membrane potential therefore decreases to a level balancing the reaction rates of the anode and cathode reactions. Note that there are anodic reactions at the cathode and cathodic reactions at the anode in the hydrogen-starved region of the cell, resulting in a locally reversed current Electrons involved in the electrochemical reactions are transported in-plane within the electrodes while the overall cell current is zero. There is no external driving force necessary for this mechanism. 

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is a potential-controlled reversal electrochemical experiment. A cyclic potential sweep is imposed on an electrode and the current response is observed. Analysis of the current response can give information about the thermodynamics and kinetics of electron transfer at the electrodesolution interface, as well as the kinetics and mechanisms of solution chemical reactions initiated by the heterogeneous electron transfer. This chapter examines fundamental experimental and theoretical aspects of the CV expjeriment (Figure 2-1). 

In addition, the time-dependence of these concentrations also contains (albeit in encoded form) the homogeneous parameters of the particular mechanism being considered. These latter techniques are termed convolutions. Convolution (and its reverse, i.e. deconvolution) are ideal for the electroanalyst because the theoretical calculation of current, and direct comparison with experimental data, is often not viable. This alternative of testing experimental currents via convolutions results in expressions for concentrations at the electrode which arise directly from the data rather than requiring iterations(s). The electrode concentrations thus estimated for a particular mechanism then allow for correlations to be drawn between potential and time, thereby assessing the fit between the data and the model. 

CNT randomly dispersed composites Many soft and rigid composites of carbon nanotubes have been reported [17]. The first carbon-nanotube-modified electrode was made from a carbon-nanotube paste using bromoform as an organic binder (though other binders are currently used for the paste formation, i.e. mineral oil) [105]. In this first application, the electrochemistry of dopamine was proved and a reversible behavior was found to occur at low potentials with rates of electron transfer much faster than those observed for graphite electrodes. Carbon-nanotube paste electrodes share the advantages of the classical carbon paste electrode (CPE) such as the feasibility to incorporate different substances, low background current, chemical inertness and an easy renewal nature [106,107]. The added value with CNTs comes from the enhancement of the electron-transfer reactions due to the already discussed mechanisms. 

For the catalytic electrode mechanism, the total surface concentration of R plus O is conserved throughout the voltammetric experiment. As a consequence, the position and width of the net response are constant over entire range of values of the parameter e. Figure 2.35 shows that the net peak current increases without limit with e. This means that the maximal catalytic effect in particular experiment is obtained at lowest frequencies. Figure 2.36 illustrates the effect of the chemical reaction on the shape of the response. For log(e) < -3, the response is identical as for the simple reversible reaction (curves 1 in Fig. 2.36). Due to the effect of the chemical reaction which consumes the O species and produces the R form, the reverse component decreases and the forward component enhances correspondingly (curves 2 in Fig. 2.36). When the response is controlled exclusively by the rate of the chemical reaction, both components of the response are sigmoidal curves separated by 2i sw on the potential axes. As shown by the inset of Fig. 2.36, it is important to note that the net currents are bell-shaped curves for any observed kinetics of the chemical reaction, with readily measurable peak current and potentials, which is of practical importance in electroanalytical methods based on this electrode mecharusm. 

For each cathodic stripping mechanism, the dimensionless net peak current is proportional to the amount of the deposited salt, which is formed in the course of the deposition step. The amount of the salt is affected by the accumulation time, concentration of the reacting ligand, and accumulation potential. The amount of the deposited salt depends sigmoidally on the deposition potential, with a half-wave potential being sensitive to the accumulation time. If the accumulation potential is significantly more positive than the peak potential, the surface concentration of the insoluble salt is independent on the deposition potential. The formation of the salt is controlled by the diffusion of the ligand, thus the net peak current is proportional to the square root of the accumulation time. If reaction (2.204) is electrochemically reversible, the real net peak current depends linearly on the frequency, which is a common feature of all electrode mechanism of an immobilized reactant (Sect. 2.6.1). The net peak potential for a reversible reaction (2.204) is a hnear function of the log(/) with a slope equal to typical theoretical response... 

---