Electrochemical shell

Liu, B., Blaszczyk, A., Mayor, M. and Wandlowski, T. (2011) Redox-switching in a viologen-type adlayer an electrochemical shell-isolated nanoparticle enhanced Raman spectroscopy study on Au(lll)-(1 X 1) single crystal electrodes. ACS Nano, 5, 5662-5672. 

Submerged-Arc Furnace. Furnaces used for smelting and for certain electrochemical operations are similar in general design to the open-arc furnace in that they are usually three-phase, have three vertical electrode columns and a shell to contain the charge, but dkect current may also be utilised They are used in the production of phosphoms, calcium carbide, ferroalloys, siUcon, other metals and compounds (17), and numerous types of high temperature refractories. 

Fig. 4.13 Electrodeposition of Cd nanoparticles on the graphite surface is followed by electrochemical oxidation and conversion of the oxidized intermediate to CdS or core-shell sulfur-CdS particles. (Reproduced from [125])...

Stable cycling was achieved in the fall 7Ah cells with a composite of spherical natural graphite coated with A1 and then stabilized with a rigid carbon coating of the disordered nature. Further investigation is needed to fally understand the effect of rigid carbon shell on the electrochemical performance of graphite-based composite materials. 

Alkali 10ns in aqueous solution are probably the most typical and most widely studied representatives of non-specific adsorption. The electrochemical term of non-specific adsorption is used to denote the survival of at least the primary hydration shell when an ion is interacting with a solid electrode. As pointed out previously, the generation of such hydrated ions at the gas-solid interface would be of great value because it would provide an opportunity to simulate the charging of the interfacial capacitor at the outer Helmholtz plane or perhaps even in the diffuse layer. 

Size, shape, and density The shielding effects of dendritic shells can likewise be caused by steric factors. Thus, the access of foreign molecules to the central functional unit can be hindered or prevented according to size and density of the dendritic shell. Sometimes, even a certain size selectivity is observed. These effects are especially interesting for electrochemically, catalytically active, redox-and photo-active functional units, since interactions with foreign molecules, such as oxygen quenching of the luminescence (photo-active units) or the access of substrates (catalytically active units) can be influenced.14 11 17,221... 

Dications 222+ and 232+ were synthesized by hydride abstraction reaction of the corresponding hydro derivatives as stable dark-brown powder. The p/CR+ values for these dications are also extremely high for doubly-charged systems (222+ 11.7 and 232+ 11.7). The electrochemical reduction of 222+ and 232+ exhibited a reduction wave at less negative potentials than that of dication 212+. This wave corresponds to the reduction of two cation units by a one-step, two-electron reduction to form thienoquinoid products. Chemical reduction of 222+ and 232+ afforded the closed-shell thienoquinoid compounds (22 and 23), which exhibited high electron-donating ability. The formation of the closed-shell molecules is in contrast with the result from reduction of dication 212+connected via a / -phenylenediyl spacer. 

Frechet and co-workers [32] studied the ability of the dendrimer shell to provide site isolation of the core porphyrin moiety, using benzene-terminated dendrimers Zn[G-n]4P (i.e. 6). From the cyclic voltammograms in CH2C12, the interfacial electron transfer rate between the porphyrin core and the electrode surface decreased with increasing dendrimer generation. However, small molecules like benzyl viologen could still penetrate the shell of 6 to access the porphyrin core as observed from the quenching of porphyrin fluorescence. Their results also revealed that the dendritic shell did not interfere electrochemically or photochemically with the porphyrin core moiety. 

In the electrochemical case, this ought to be reflected both in slow exhange kinetics and also in a value of the transfer coefficient significantly different from one-half. Dr. Vlcek originally attributed the observed slow electrochemical rate to transfer via excited electronic states. I do not think that is correct. I believe that slow kinetics of ligand exchange in the first solvation shells are generally responsible... 

In this chapter, two carbon-supported PtSn catalysts with core-shell nanostructure were designed and prepared to explore the effect of the nanostructure of PtSn nanoparticles on the performance of ethanol electro-oxidation. The physical (XRD, TEM, EDX, XPS) characterization was carried out to clarify the microstructure, the composition, and the chemical environment of nanoparticles. The electrochemical characterization, including cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, of the two PtSn/C catalysts was conducted to characterize the electrochemical activities to ethanol oxidation. Finally, the performances of DEFCs with PtSn/C anode catalysts were tested. The microstmc-ture and composition of PtSn catalysts were correlated with their performance for ethanol electrooxidation. 

From the above experimental results, it can be seen that the both PtSn catalysts have a similar particle size leading to the same physical surface area. However, the ESAs of these catalysts are significantly different, as indicated by the CV curves. The large difference between ESA values for the two catalysts could only be explained by differences in detailed nanostructure as a consequence of differences in the preparation of the respective catalyst. On the basis of the preparation process and the CV measurement results, a model has been developed for the structures of these PtSn catalysts as shown in Fig. 15.10. The PtSn-1 catalyst is believed to have a Sn core/Pt shell nanostructure while PtSn-2 is believed to have a Pt core/Sn shell structure. Both electrochemical results and fuel cell performance indicate that PtSn-1 catalyst significantly enhances ethanol electrooxidation. Our previous research found that an important difference between PtRu and PtSn catalysts is that the addition of Ru reduces the lattice parameter of Pt, while Sn dilates the lattice parameter. The reduced Pt lattice parameter resulting from Ru addition seems to be unfavorable for ethanol adsorption and degrades the DEFC performance. In this new work on PtSn catalysts with more... 

---