Electrochemical-potential time scale

The UPD and anodic oxidation of Pb monolayers on tellurium was investigated also in acidic aqueous solutions of Pb(II) cations and various concentrations of halides (iodide, bromide, and chloride) [103]. The Te substrate was a 0.5 xm film electrodeposited in a previous step on polycrystalline Au from an acidic Te02 solution. Particular information on the time-frequency-potential variance of the electrochemical process was obtained by potentiodynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (PDEIS), as it was difficult to apply stationary techniques for accurate characterization, due to a tendency to chemical interaction between the Pb adatoms and the substrate on a time scale of minutes. The impedance... 

Phase-sensitive detection is not at all specihc for EPR spectroscopy but is used in many different types of experiments. Some readers may be familiar with the electrochemical technique of differential-pulse voltammetry. Here, the potential over the working and reference electrode, E, is varied slowly enough to be considered as essentially static on a short time scale. The disturbance is a pulse of small potential difference, AE, and the in-phase, in-frequency detection of the current affords a very low noise differential of the i-E characteristic of a redox couple. 

The evolution of a new set of electrochemical waves (as opposed to the gradual shifting of the redox couple) on addition of guest species may be due to a number of factors. If the complex formed has a particularly high stability constant and has a redox potential which is markedly different from that of the free ligand, a new set of waves may be observed. However, if the decomplexation kinetics of the complex formed is particularly slow on the electrochemical time scale then, as the potential is scanned between the vertex points during a cyclic voltammetric experiment, the solution complexed species will be stable over this time period and the two sets of waves will correspond to free ligand and complex. Therefore care should be taken to determine the cause of the evolution of a new set of electrochemical waves and... 

For the response illustrated in Figure 12, in which the difference between the two redox potentials is AE° = 0.34 V, one can calculate that Acom 105 - 106. This value is typical of a mixed-valent compound which, on the electrochemical time scale, is at the border between... 

The rate of dE/dt is always kept constant during a potential scan, although obtaining a series of polarograms as a function of v can be extremely informative. (The variation of the sweep rate can be regarded as being equivalent to a variation of varying the time-scale of observation of an electrochemical experiment, as will become clear later in Section 6.4.3.)... 

Molar conductivity measurements are equally applicable to both solid and liquid electrolytes. In contrast, the measurement of current flowing through an electrochemical cell on a time scale of minutes or hours while the cell is perturbed by a constant dc potential is only of value for solid solvents (Bruce and Vincent, 1987) where convection is absent. Because of the unique aspects of dc polarisation in a solid solvent this topic is treated in some detail in this chapter. Let us begin by considering a cell of the form ... 

The possibilities afforded by SAM-controlled electrochemical metal deposition were already demonstrated some time ago by Sondag-Huethorst et al. [36] who used patterned SAMs as templates to deposit metal structures with line widths below 100 nm. While this initial work illustrated the potential of SAM-controlled deposition on the nanometer scale further activities towards technological exploitation have been surprisingly moderate and mostly concerned with basic studies on metal deposition on uniform, alkane thiol-based SAMs [37-40] that have been extended in more recent years to aromatic thiols [41-43]. A major reason for the slow development of this area is that electrochemical metal deposition with, in principle, the advantage of better control via the electrochemical potential compared to none-lectrochemical methods such as electroless metal deposition or evaporation, is quite critical in conjunction with SAMs. Relying on their ability to act as barriers for charge transfer and particle diffusion, the minimization of defects in and control of the structural quality of SAMs are key to their performance and set the limits for their nanotechnological applications. 

As we have seen in the previous sections, our understanding of SOFC cathode mechanisms often hinges on interpretation on the magnitude and time scale of electrochemical characteristics. However, these characteristics are often strongly influenced by factors that have nothing to do with the electrode reaction itself but rather the setup of the experiment. In this section we point out two commonly observed effects that can potentially lead to experimental artifacts in electrochemical measurements (1) polarization resistance caused gas-phase diffusion and (2) artifacts related to the cell geometry. As we will... 

The foregoing has been concerned with the application of SERS to gain information on surface electronic coupling effects for simple adsorbed redox couples that are reversible in the electrochemical as well as chemical sense, that is, exhibit Nernstian potential-dependent responses on the electrochemical time scale. As noted in the Introduction, a major hoped-for application of SERS to electrochemical processes is to gain surface molecular information regarding the kinetics and mechanisms of multiple-step electrode reactions, including the identification of reactive surface intermediates. 

Secondly, selectivity is not always achievable. For example, permselectivity of ion-exchanging polymer films fails at high electrolyte concentration. We have shown that even if permselectivity is not thermodynamically found, measurements on appropriate time scales in transient experiments can lead to kinetic permselectivity. To rationalise this behaviour we recall that the thermodynamic restraint, electrochemical potential, can be split into two components the electrical and chemical terms. These conditions may be satisfied on different time scales. Dependent on the relative transfer rates of ions and net neutral species, transient responses may be under electroneutrality or activity control. 

Ultrafast injection of carriers into the UO2 substrate suggests that overall cell efficiency is not limited by this process but by intervening transfer mechanisms (e.g., trapped state populations reducing quantum yield) or longer time scale electron-dye recombination rates (typically taking microseconds). For example, it was found that the absorbed photon to current efficiency (APCE) is considerably reduced for V compared to IV under identical cell conditions (27,55). While V has a 350 mV lower electrochemical reduction potential than IV (and hence a red-shifted absorption spectrum), it is unclear why the redder absorbing dye (V) does not inject as efficiently (56). Recent visible excitation with broadband... 

---