Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Efficiency comparisons

Optically Active Alcohols and Esters. In addition to the hydrolysis of esters formed by simple alcohols described above, Hpases and esterases also catalyze the hydrolysis of a wide range of esters based on more complex and synthetically useful cycHc and acycHc alcohols (Table 5). Although the hydrolysis of acetates often gives the desirable resolution, to achieve maximum selectivity and reaction efficiency, comparison of various esters is recommended. [Pg.338]

Figure 4-20. Efficiency comparison between a variable-volume ratio and a fixed-volume ratio compressor. These compressors have an asymmetric rotor profile [4]. Figure 4-20. Efficiency comparison between a variable-volume ratio and a fixed-volume ratio compressor. These compressors have an asymmetric rotor profile [4].
Hughmark [181] has proposed empirical correlations for better fit of experimental data to transfer units and thus tray efficiency comparison with the AIChE method [2]. [Pg.45]

Part 4 Performing a ranking test to determine if either analytical method or location affects the results as a systematic error (bias) and Part 5 Computing the efficient comparison of two methods as described by Youden and Steiner in reference [7],... [Pg.171]

Collaborative Laboratory Studies Part 5 - Efficient Comparison of Two Methods... [Pg.187]

COMPUTATIONS FOR EFFICIENT COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS (COMP METH WORKSHEET)... [Pg.187]

The section following shows a statistical test (text for the Comp Meth MathCad Worksheet) for the efficient comparison of two analytical methods. This test requires that replicate measurements be made on two different samples using two different analytical methods. The test will determine whether there is a significant difference in the precision and accuracy for the two methods. It will also determine whether there is significant systematic error between the methods, and calculate the magnitude of that error (as bias). [Pg.187]

This set of articles presents the computational details and actual values for each of the statistical methods shown for collaborative tests. These methods include the use of precision and estimated accuracy comparisons, ANOVA tests, Student s t-testing, The Rank Test for Method Comparison, and the Efficient Comparison of Methods tests. From using these statistical tests the following conclusions can be derived ... [Pg.192]

Sections on matrix algebra, analytic geometry, experimental design, instrument and system calibration, noise, derivatives and their use in data analysis, linearity and nonlinearity are described. Collaborative laboratory studies, using ANOVA, testing for systematic error, ranking tests for collaborative studies, and efficient comparison of two analytical methods are included. Discussion on topics such as the limitations in analytical accuracy and brief introductions to the statistics of spectral searches and the chemometrics of imaging spectroscopy are included. [Pg.556]

Irradiation at >320 nm releases from the polymer, whether insoluble or water-soluble, free oligosaccharides in very high yields. A simple illustration of such a sequence carried out with either insoluble 2-aminoethyl-substituted poly(acrylamide) beads or with water-soluble, substituted poly(vinyl alcohol) is presented in Scheme 9 the isolated overall yield of lactose was 29.9% (soluble-polymer approach). The synthesis on light-sensitive polymers facilitates the isolation of products, which is important from the preparative point of view and as a tool for the study of enzymes, permitting efficient comparison of acceptor specificity and being capable of demonstrating de novo synthesis. [Pg.187]

Applications of the PCR technique include 1) efficient comparison of a normal cloned gene with an uncloned mutant form of the gene, 2) detection of low-abundance nucleic acid sequences, 3) forensic analysis of DNA samples, and 4) prenatal diagnosis and carrier detection, for example, of cystic fibrosis. [Pg.508]

Figure 1. SFE efficiency comparison using CO2 and CCtymcthanol modifier. Figure 1. SFE efficiency comparison using CO2 and CCtymcthanol modifier.
Capacity and Efficiency Comparison Kister et al. [Chem. Eng. Progr., 90(2), 23 (1994)] reported a study of the relative capacity and efficiency of conventional trays, modem random packings, and conventional structured packings. They found that, for each device optimally designed for the design requirements, a rough guide could be developed on the basis of flow parameter L/G (p( /p, )05 (abcissa in... [Pg.81]

TABLE 5. Utilization efficiency comparisons of fossil fuels and hydrogen ... [Pg.17]

Identifies changes in expression as a result of treatment compared to time-matched vehicle controls. Does not allow for efficient comparison within treatment class... [Pg.537]

Bioenergetics Biomass, Bioengineering of Biomass Utilization, Limits of Bioreactors Catalysis, Industrial Coal Structure and Reactivity Combustion Energy Efficiency Comparisons Among Countries Energy Flows in Ecology... [Pg.533]

Keller, C., Hammer, D., Kayser, A., Richner, W., Brodbeck, M., and Ennhauser, M. (2003). Root development and heavy metal phytoextraction efficiency Comparison of different plant species. Plant Soil 249, 67-81. [Pg.207]

The parameters of interest for the heat-flow and efficiency comparisons are now tabulated as... [Pg.52]

All of this chapter s efficiency comparisons are based on total % S02 oxidized after all catalyst beds, defined as ... [Pg.230]

Zieglar, D.L. 1992. Hydrocarbon columns, buoyancy pressures, and seal efficiency comparisons of oil and gas accumulations in California and the Rocky Mountains area. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 76 501-508. [Pg.13]

Fig. 3. Efficiency comparison between a conventional local update algorithm (open symbols) and the generalized geometric cluster algorithm (closed symbols), for a binary mixture (see text) with size ratio a. Whereas the autocorrelation time per particle (expressed in us of CPU time per particle move) rapidly increases with size ratio, the GCA features only a weak dependence on a. Reprinted figure with permission from [19], Copyright 2004 by the American Physical Society... Fig. 3. Efficiency comparison between a conventional local update algorithm (open symbols) and the generalized geometric cluster algorithm (closed symbols), for a binary mixture (see text) with size ratio a. Whereas the autocorrelation time per particle (expressed in us of CPU time per particle move) rapidly increases with size ratio, the GCA features only a weak dependence on a. Reprinted figure with permission from [19], Copyright 2004 by the American Physical Society...

See other pages where Efficiency comparisons is mentioned: [Pg.8]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.2089]    [Pg.1555]    [Pg.280]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.232 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.269 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.411 ]




SEARCH



Efficiency, tray comparison

Efficient comparison of two methods

SO2 oxidation efficiency 3-1 vs. 4-0 comparison

SO2 oxidation efficiency comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info