Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Effective field boundary condition

Fig. 50. Magnetization profiles across thin Ising films [eq. (1) with H — H — 0], upper part, and near the surface of semi-infinite Heisenberg ferromagnels, lower part (where bulk behavior in the Monte Carlo simulation is enforced by an effective field boundary condition at z — 16). Note that in the Ising case (where three film thicknesses L = 5, 10, and 20 are shown) the surface layer magnetization m- — m(z — 0) is independent of L, and for L > 10 already the bulk value of the order parameter is reached in the center of the film. For the Heisenberg model, on the other hand, at a comparable temperature distance from % the free surface produces a Long-range perturbation of the local magnetization m(z). From Binder and Hohenbcrg (1974). Fig. 50. Magnetization profiles across thin Ising films [eq. (1) with H — H — 0], upper part, and near the surface of semi-infinite Heisenberg ferromagnels, lower part (where bulk behavior in the Monte Carlo simulation is enforced by an effective field boundary condition at z — 16). Note that in the Ising case (where three film thicknesses L = 5, 10, and 20 are shown) the surface layer magnetization m- — m(z — 0) is independent of L, and for L > 10 already the bulk value of the order parameter is reached in the center of the film. For the Heisenberg model, on the other hand, at a comparable temperature distance from % the free surface produces a Long-range perturbation of the local magnetization m(z). From Binder and Hohenbcrg (1974).
With the Monte Carlo method, the sample is taken to be a cubic lattice consisting of 70 x 70 x 70 sites with intersite distance of 0.6 nm. By applying a periodic boundary condition, an effective sample size up to 8000 sites (equivalent to 4.8-p.m long) can be generated in the field direction (37,39). Carrier transport is simulated by a random walk in the test system under the action of a bias field. The simulation results successfully explain many of the experimental findings, notably the field and temperature dependence of hole mobilities (37,39). [Pg.411]

The electron wave function becomes localised in the top and bottom part of the cylindrical surface where the effective magnetic field perpendicular to the tube surface is the largest. Thus the boundary condition along the circumference direction becomes less important in high magnetic fields as has been discussed in Sec. 2. Consequently the distinction between metallic and semiconducting... [Pg.71]

Farmer (6) reviewed the various diffusion models for soil and developed solutions for several of these models. An appropriate model for field studies is a nonsteady state model that assumes that material is mixed into the soil to a depth L and then allowed to diffuse both to the surface and more deeply into the soil. Material diffusing to the surface is immediately removed by diffusion and convection in the air above the soil. The effect of this assumption is to make the concentration of a diffusing compound zero at the soil surface. With these boundary conditions the solution to Equation 8 can be converted to the useful form ... [Pg.201]

In this contribution, we describe and illustrate the latest generalizations and developments[1]-[3] of a theory of recent formulation[4]-[6] for the study of chemical reactions in solution. This theory combines the powerful interpretive framework of Valence Bond (VB) theory [7] — so well known to chemists — with a dielectric continuum description of the solvent. The latter includes the quantization of the solvent electronic polarization[5, 6] and also accounts for nonequilibrium solvation effects. Compared to earlier, related efforts[4]-[6], [8]-[10], the theory [l]-[3] includes the boundary conditions on the solute cavity in a fashion related to that of Tomasi[ll] for equilibrium problems, and can be applied to reaction systems which require more than two VB states for their description, namely bimolecular Sjy2 reactions ],[8](b),[12],[13] X + RY XR + Y, acid ionizations[8](a),[14] HA +B —> A + HB+, and Menschutkin reactions[7](b), among other reactions. Compared to the various reaction field theories in use[ll],[15]-[21] (some of which are discussed in the present volume), the theory is distinguished by its quantization of the solvent electronic polarization (which in general leads to deviations from a Self-consistent limiting behavior), the inclusion of nonequilibrium solvation — so important for chemical reactions, and the VB perspective. Further historical perspective and discussion of connections to other work may be found in Ref.[l],... [Pg.259]

The two terms in A[ V, r/t) represent the effects of the fluctuating viscous forces and the fluctuating pressure field, respectively. The molecular viscous-dissipation term in (6.43) is negligible at high Reynolds numbers. However, it becomes important in boundary layers where the Reynolds number is low, and must be included in the boundary conditions as described below. [Pg.274]

The authors of Ref. [12] reconsidered the problem of magnetic field in quark matter taking into account the rotated electromagnetism . They came to the conclusion that magnetic field can exist in superconducting quark matter in any case, although it does not form a quantized vortex lattice, because it obeys sourceless Maxwell equations and there is no Meissner effect. In our opinion this latter result is incorrect, since the equations for gauge fields were not taken into account and the boundary conditions were not posed correctly. [Pg.264]

A major question concerning the development of jet flow subjected to heating is the effect on entrainment. Now because of the periodic boundary conditions imposed on the computational domain in the present simulation, the net entrainment over the domain has to vanish. Nevertheless, as shown below, considerable insight into the problem can be obtained by examining the entraining velocity field, which displays velocity vectors in the ambient fluid in the immediate neighbourhood surrounding the jet. [Pg.181]


See other pages where Effective field boundary condition is mentioned: [Pg.106]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.4]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.237 ]




SEARCH



Boundary field

Condition Effects

Effectiveness conditions

Field condition

Field condition effects

© 2024 chempedia.info