Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Effect of Phase Difference

The effect of phase differences on dynamic deformation density may be estimated as follows (Souhassou et al. 1991). The amplitudes of the deformation density Fourier series may be written as (Fig. 5.9)... [Pg.109]

The position of ZPD (Zero Path Difference) is critical to the Fourier Transform calculation, since the algorithm assumes that the central burst in the interferogram is in fact the ZPD. However, due to the refractive index properties of the beamsplitter material, the ZPD is not at the same position for every wavelength measured. There are several ways to overcome these phase differences. The most common method is to use a correction factor, which is known as phase correction. This correction factor is calculated for every wavelength, based on a double sided interferogram, since this tends to minimize the effects of phase difference. In practice, most infrared spectrometers collect single sided interferograms, since this halves the mirror movement, and consequently the number of datapoints to be Fourier transformed. [Pg.495]

This equation describes the Fourier transfonn of the scattering potential V r). It should be noted that, in the Bom approximation the scattering amplitude/(0) is a real quantity and the additional phase shift q(9) is zero. For atoms with high atomic number this is no longer tme. For a rigorous discussion on the effects of the different approximations see [2] or [5]. [Pg.1629]

In this section, by applying the heterodyne interferometry to a mixed gas of H2 and D2 molecules, we probe attosecond dynamics of nuclear wavepackets in the molecules. We find that not only the single molecule responses but also the propagation effects of harmonics differ between the two isotopes and that to discuss dynamics of molecules in the single molecule responses, the propagation effects need to be excluded from the raw harmonic signals. The measured relative phase as well as intensity ratio are found to be monotonic functions of the harmonic order and are successfully reproduced by applying... [Pg.72]

Let us now consider the effect of a difference between the heat capacity of pure liquid i and pure solid i on the enthalpy and entropy of fusion and subsequently on the phase diagram. This effect is easily taken into consideration by using eqs. (1.24) and (1.54). Ais now given as... [Pg.95]

It is a well known fact that the vibration frequency of the internal stretch mode of CO decreases from its gas phase value of 2143 cm on chemisorption onto a metal surface. In general terms, depending on the adsorption site it takes values between 2000-2100 cm Mn the ontop position, 1900-2000 cm" when bridgebonded and 1800-1900 cm for molecules in the hollow site. The vibration frequency of a particular system is of course the total effect of the different kinds of interactions sketched in Fig. 2. For example, simply the fact that the oscillator is attached to a more or less rigid substrate so that the... [Pg.7]

For the forced convective region, only limited data are available on the effects of the different variables involved, since the existence of this region has only been recognized recently. As previously mentioned, the velocity required for the suppression of nucleate boiling increases with pressure further, an increase in pressure reduced the specific volume of the vapour and hence the linear velocity of the two phase mixture at a given quality will be reduced. Thus higher velocities and steam qualities would be required for the forced convective region to be entered at the same heat flux. The effect of diameter is, as far as can be seen from the work of previous experiments and from these experiments, that to be expected with convective heat transfer, namely, that the coefficient is proportional to the diameter or the equivalent diameter to the power —02. [Pg.258]

The property of interest to characterize a surfactant or a mixture of surfactants is its hydrophilic-lipophilic tendency, which has been expressed in many different ways through a variety of concepts such as the hydrophiUc-lipophilic balance (HLB), the phase inversion temperature (PIT), the cohesive energy ratio (CER), the surfactant affinity difference (SAD) or the hydrophilic-lipophilic deviation (HLD) [1], which were found to be more or less satisfactory depending on the case. In the next section, the quantification of the effects of the different compounds involved in the formulation of surfactant-oil-water systems will be discussed in details to extract the concept of characteristic parameter of the surfactant, as a way to quantify its hydrophilic-lipophilic property independently of the nature of the physicochemical environment. [Pg.85]

When HLD = 0 three-phase behavior takes place because of the exact compensation of the effect of the different formulation variables expressed in Eqs. 4 and 5. hi practice, an unidimensional formulation scan is carried out to detect the occurrence of three-phase behavior. In such a scan, only one of the formulation variables (appearing in Eqs. 4 and 5) is changed, while all the others are held constant, as well as composition variables, i.e., surfactant concentration and water/oil ratio (WOR). [Pg.88]

The use of a silver salt in the stationary phase for the GLC of alkenes was one of the earliest examples of exploiting stereoselective features in coordination,99 and dicarbonylrhodium(I)-3-tri-fluoroacetylcamphorate (66) has been shown to provide an excellent stationary phase for the GC of monoalkenes, for complex formation is stronger and the effects of structural differences between cis and trans, and between positional isomers, is more decisive. [Pg.560]

The sample diluent affects the solute dispersion. If we consider the effects of three different diluents (hexane, chloroform, and acetone) on the chromatographic behavior of a TG mixture on RP columns using, for example, acetonitrile and ethanol as the mobile phase, we can see that the TGs dissolved in hexane provided only a minute chromatographic trace, whereas dissolution in chloroform yielded excellent detection and resolution. These results can best be explained by invoking the solvophobic theory of Horvath and Melander (85). [Pg.211]

The diffusion of the electroactive ions is both physical and due to electron transfer reactions.45 The occurrence of either or both mechanisms is a function of the electroactive species present. It has been observed that the detailed electrochemical behaviour of the electroactive species often deviates from the ideal thin film behaviour. For example, for an ideal nemstian reaction under Langmuir isotherm conditions there should be no splitting between the anodic and cathodic peaks in the cyclic voltammogram further, for a one-electron charge at 25 °C the width at half peak height should be 90.6 mV.4 In practice a difference between anodic and cathodic potentials may be finite even at slow scan rates. This arises from kinetic effects of phase formation and of interconversion between different forms of the polymer-confined electroactive molecules with different standard potentials.46... [Pg.15]

C. The same pattern holds for the data on ammonia yields, as one would expect from Equations 1 and 2. The increase at — 80°C. suggests an effect of phase change while the opposed temperature effect at — 196°C. suggests that a different reaction mechanism is controlling at — 196°C. consistent with observations from electron spin resonance studies that different stable-free radicals are observed below — 150°C. for glycine. The low carbonyl yields found for methionine and the peptides at — 80°C. indicate that the low temperature radicals may still be the stable forms at... [Pg.50]

It is worth mentioning here that comparisons between the efficiency of different MIP separation systems like two HPLC systems or two CEC systems, or an HPLC system with a CEC system, are quite difficult when the adsorption isotherms are nonlinear. One of the typical difficulties is that the phase ratios in the two systems may be different. The effect of phase ratio on the separation and particularly on the achievable optimum separation is a complex question even in linear chromatography. In nonlinear chromatography this is really difficult and also burdened by the differences between the isotherms of the two compounds to be separated. The complexity of this matter has been mostly overlooked in the MIP literature and the visual comparison of two separations in rather different systems, operated under very different conditions, has frequently lead to statements declaring one technique better than the other. [Pg.282]

Of 210 patients with type 2 diabetes, 179 completed a randomized study of the effects of five different doses (0.045, 0.225, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 mg) or metformin 100 mg bd for 12 weeks after a 4-week metformin run-in phase. The numbers of people who reported nausea and vomiting were small (4%) and comparable to the incidence with metformin (6%) (15). Careful upwards titration allows higher doses (2 mg/day) to be tolerated (2). [Pg.389]

Polled bodybuilders utilized the effects of Glucophage differently for different phases ... [Pg.131]

In general, however, the effect of phase is much less marked than for ionic species and results for different phases will not be considered separately in this section. Since, in fact, more experiments have been carried out on the radiation chemistry of liquids than of gases or solids, most of the results discussed in this section refer to the liquid state. [Pg.87]

The asymmetric spin boson model presents a significantly more challenging non-adiabatic condensed phase test problem due to the asymmetry in forces from the different surfaces. Approximate mean field methods, for example, will fail to reliably capture the effects of these different forces on the dynamics. [Pg.429]


See other pages where Effect of Phase Difference is mentioned: [Pg.44]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.709]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.206]   


SEARCH



Difference effect

Phase difference

Phase effects

© 2024 chempedia.info