Ecotoxicology, determination

The link between the ecological/ecotoxicological risk assessment and the risk management frameworks is demonstrated. The ecological risk assessment consists of seven interactive elements (Fig. 17). The quantitative and descriptive science used to conduct ERA (Table 5) does not answer, in a direct way, the question of what should be done to manage the risk. Science determines adversity, but the public determines acceptability (Fig. 18). But acceptable risk is a highly subjective and relative term. It is time and space-specific and depends upon definitions of quality of life and robustness of the environment. 

Kimerle [27] reviewed the ecotoxicology of LAS focusing on the results rather than on the method of analysis, for which the author referred to the review undertaken by Painter and Zabel [30], alluding only to two papers on biota sample preparation. Litz et al. [31] determined the concentration of LAS in rye grass by Azure A active substances (AzAAS). AzAAS is a non-specific colorimetric method, which has not been used as frequently as MBAS (see Chapter 3.1). Briefly, it consists of the formation of an ion association complex with a dyed solution of Azure A (cationic). The complex formed is solvent-extractable and is separated from unreacted dye prior to colour measurement. 

Chemical analyses are mainly used for detecting hazard of liquid and solid wastes [175]. Governmental orders and laws regulate the evaluation of hazard of effluent by toxicological tests. Waste control includes the determination of 30 chemical parameters, coliform count, and the result of ecotoxicological test (D. magna test). Category of toxicity ... 

In the chemical safety report, the hazard assessment of a particular substance is based on the data set provided in the technical dossier. This contains substance-specific information on physicochemical properties as well as on toxicological and ecotoxicological hazards. One objective of the hazard assessment is the substance s hazard identification, which comprises the determination of its physicochemical and hazardous properties for the purpose of classification. Concerning human health hazards, both human and nonhuman information is taken into consideration and evaluated with respect to the classification criteria laid down in the Dangerous Substances Directive and in the CLP Regulation, respectively. However, in most cases human data do not exist, so the hazard identification has to be based on data from animal experiments. With respect to teratogenicity, this hazardous property may in principle be detected in the following toxicity studies ... 

Undoubtedly the most important features of what determines whether a drug is detected in the environment are its physical and ecotoxicological properties, and these will be discussed in the following sections. 

Ternes, T., and R.-D. Wilken, Eds., Drugs and Hormones as Pollutants of the Aquatic Environment Determination and Ecotoxicological Impacts, Elsevier, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1999. 

This paper discusses the quality assurance procedures for ecotoxicology laboratories. It will attempt to concentrate on those areas that are of particular concern to those individuals determining the toxicity of chemicals to fish and wildlife (ecotoxicology testing). 

Ellgehousen, H., J.A. Guth, and H.O. Esser. 1980. Factors determining the bioaccumulation potential of pesticides in the individual compartments of aquatic food chains. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 4 134-157. 

Moreno-Garrido, I., Lubian, L.M. and Soares, A.M.V.M. (2000) Influence of cellular density on determination of EC(50) in microalgal growth inhibition tests, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 47 (2), 112-116. 

Chemical analyses are an indispensable complement to ecotoxicological investigations, but they are not directly integrated in the application of the pT-scale for industrial effluent assessment. Performed in parallel, assessment of chemical substances is governed by a set of criteria, which are derived from ecotoxicological threshold (NOEC) values, in order to derive quality objectives or standards. When bioassay and chemistry results are both available for effluent assessment, they should be ranked equally. For determining the overall hazard of wastewaters, the most conservative information with respect to aquatic health will serve as the yardstick to ensure environmental protection. 

Hollert, H., Durr, M., Olsman, H., Halldin, K., van Bavel, B., Brack, W., Tysklind, M., Engwall, M. and Braunbeck, T. (2002a) Biological and chemical determination of dioxin-like compounds in sediments by means of a Sediment Triad approach in the catchment area of the River Neckar, Ecotoxicology 11, 323-336. 

---