E counter-electrode

WE working electrode Ref reference electrode CE counter-electrode The dotted arrow symbolizes the existing link between the voltage indicated by the voltmeter (controlled voltage between WE and Ref) and the actual voltage delivered by the power supply between WE and CE. 

In another important category of electrochemical experiments, there is a command signal with a linear variation with time that is imposed. Included in this category is voltamperometry, frequently abbreviated to voltammetry, in which a linear potential sweep is imposed. The slope of the U[t) or E[t) curve is called the scan rate (in V s ). The response given by the system is usually represented by a curve I=f(U) or 1= f(E), in which Uor E, and consequently / vary with time. The direction of the potential sweep can be reversed when a given value of the potential is reached. In this case, the experiment is then called cyclic voltammetry. 

After letting the experiment last for a reasonable duration, it is sometimes possible to reach a current/voltage point that does not change with time. In this case one refers to a steady or stationary state. The steady (U,I) or ( )/) curves that are plotted in these conditions are useful tools for analysing the behaviour of electrochemical systems .  

This notion must not be confused with the notion of equilibrium in other words, the terms steady and constant are not interchangeable. For a steady state to be established, it is merely necessary that the relevant parameters, at any point in space, do not vary with time. Strictly speaking, an electrochemical system in a steady state can therefore present spatial gradients, but the latter must not vary with time. For instance, as far as the concentrations are concerned, the steady state is expressed by the following  

Equilibrium states are particular cases of steady states in which the overall current is 

---

FIGURE 4-1 Schematic diagram of a cell for voltammetric measurements w.e., working electrode r.e., reference electrode c.e., counter electrode. The electrodes are inserted through holes in the cell cover. 

Fig. 1.2. Flow cell for adsorption measurements and on-line mass spectroscopy. The working electrode (w.e.) at the bottom of the cell is conneced directly to the MS c.e. = counter electrode, r.e. = reference electrode.

C link to mercury with a Pt wire D DME capillary E counter electrode (Pt)... 

Fig. 3. (a) Circuit for current step experiments. B = battery Rg = galvanostat resistance, I.E. = indicator electrode, C.E. = counter electrode, R.E. = reference electrode, V = voltmeter, (b) Current—time profile. 

Fig. 5.8 SFG cell for electrochemistry and spectroscopy. (A) Pt working electrode, (B) reference electrode, (C) vacuum stopcock, (D) connection for working electrode, (E) counter electrode, (F) Cap2 window.

Fig. 3 Experimental setup for measurements of capacitance at the semiconductor—electrolyte interface. W.E. working electrode (semiconductor electrode), C.E. counter electrode, and R.E. reference electrode.

In Fig. 3-25 the locational dependence of t/, and is shown together. For practical applications and because of possible disturbance by foreign fields (e.g., stray currents) and t/g are less amenable to evaluation than f/g, which can always be determined by a point of inflection between two extreme values [50]. Furthermore, it should be indicated by Fig. 2-7 that there is a possibility of raising the sensitivity by anodic polarization which naturally is only applicable with small objects. In such cases care must be particularly taken that the counter electrode is sufficiently far away so that its voltage cone does not influence the reference electrodes. 

SXS measurements. (A) Single-crystal disk electrode, (B) Pt counter electrode, (C) Ag/AgCl reference electrode, (D) Mylar window, (E) electrolyte solution, (F) inlet for electrolyte solution, (G) outlet for electrolyte solution, (H) cell body, (1) micrometer, (J) electrode holder, (K) outer chamber, (b) Cell configuration for electrochemical measurement, (c) Cell configuration for SXRD measurement. (From Kondo et al., 2002, with permission from Elsevier.)... 

If an anodically colored electrochromic material (e.g., Ir02) is used as one electrode in the device in Eig. 33.1fi and a cathodically colored (e.g., WO3) is used as the other electrode, a much larger change in transmission per charge supplied can be seen compared to the case when only one electrode is electrochromic. Also, the use of an intercalation material as the counter electrode may be advantageous for the device shown in Eig. 33.1a, as it can minimize undesired reactions on the counter electrode. 

The photoelectrolysis of H2O can be performed in cells being very similar to those applied for the production of electricity. They differ only insofar as no additional redox couple is used in a photoelectrolysis cell. The energy scheme of corresponding systems, semiconductor/liquid/Pt, is illustrated in Fig. 9, the upper scheme for an n-type, the lower for a p-type electrode. In the case of an n-type electrode the hole created by light excitation must react with H2O resulting in 02-formation whereas at the counter electrode H2 is produced. The electrolyte can be described by two redox potentials, E°(H20/H2) and E (H20/02) which differ by 1.23 eV. At equilibrium (left side of Fig. 9) the electrochemical potential (Fermi level) is constant in the whole system and it occurs in the electrolyte somewhere between the two standard energies E°(H20/H2) and E°(H20/02). The exact position depends on the relative concentrations of H2 and O2. Illuminating the n-type electrode the electrons are driven toward the bulk of the semiconductor and reach the counter electrode via the external circuit at which they are consumed for Hj-evolution whereas the holes are dir tly... 

An electrospray is generally produced by the application of an electric field to a small flow of liquid from a capillary tube toward a counter electrode. The principles of electrospray as applicable to mass spectrometry and the mechanisms involved have been a subject of intense debate over the last decade and have been addressed even before that. This is evident from the discussions in the 2000 issue of the Journal of Mass Spectrometry (e.g., Mora11), the book by Cole,12 and several reviews.8,10 13 14 Here we present a summary encapsulating the relevant observations and direct the readers to the above articles for a more elaborate account. 

Figure 2.39 (a) Schematic representation of the experimental arrangement for attenuated total reflection of infrared radiation in an electrochemical cell, (b) Schematic representation of the ATR cell design commonly employed in in situ 1R ATR experiments. SS = stainless steel cell body, usually coated with teflon P — Ge or Si prism WE = working electrode, evaporated or sputtered onto prism CE = platinum counter electrode RE = reference electrode T = teflon or viton O ring seals E = electrolyte. 

FIGURE 2.45. Equivalent circuit for the cell and instrument. WE, RE, and CE, working, reference, and counter electrodes, respectively iph, photocurrent ij/, double-layer charging current Q, double-layer differential capacitance Rc, Ru, cell compensated (by the potentiostat) and uncompensated resistances, respectively Rs, sampling resistance RP, potentiostat resistance E, potential difference imposed by the potentiostat between the reference and working electrodes Vpu, photo-potential as measured across the sampling resistor. Adapted from Figure 1 of reference 51, with permission from Elsevier. 

---