Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dynamic Simulation Results

Large disturbances in both feed flow rate and feed composition were imposed on the system to test its ability to maintain stable regulatory control and to hold product streams near their desire specifications. [Pg.248]

Before showing the run with impurity accmnulation inside the column, the normal feed composition load disturbance changes are shown. Changes in the feed F3 water molar composition of +10% are made at time = 5 h. When feed F3 water molar composition is changed, the acetic acid molar composition is adjusted so that the total molar feed rate of F3 is maintained constant. [Pg.279]

ACCTIC ACID-WATER (ISOBUTYL ACETATE AS THE ENTRAINER) [Pg.282]


Visuahzation and analysis of structure and dynamics simulation results. Free of charge for academic use. Available for different platforms. Imports TINKER results and accepts various file formats. hitp //www.csc.ji/gopenmol/... [Pg.399]

We first summarize the salient features of the Langevin dynamics simulation results followed by a theoretical analysis. [Pg.244]

Keszei, E., Murphrey, T. H. and Rossky, P. J. Electron hydration dynamics simulation results compared to pump and probe experiments, J.Phys.Chem., 99 (1995), 22-28... [Pg.359]

Checking to see that the units of all terms in all equations are consistent is perhaps another trivial and obvious step, but one that is often forgotten. It is essential to be particularly careful of the time units of parameters in dynamic models. Any units can be used (seconds, minutes, hours, etc.), but they cannot be mixed. We will use minutes in most of our examples, but it should be remembered that many parameters are commonly on other time bases and need to be converted appropriately, e.g., overall heat transfer coefficients in Btu/h °F ft or velocity in m/s. Dynamic simulation results are frequently in error because the engineer has forgotten a factor of 60 somewhere in the equations. [Pg.17]

Fig. 4.1 a Typical time evolution of a given correlation function in a glass-forming system for different temperatures (T >T2>...>T ), b Molecular dynamics simulation results [105] for the time decay of different correlation functions in polyisoprene at 363 K normalized dynamic structure factor at the first static structure factor maximum solid thick line)y intermediate incoherent scattering function of the hydrogens solid thin line), dipole-dipole correlation function dashed line) and second order orientational correlation function of three different C-H bonds measurable by NMR dashed-dotted lines)... [Pg.68]

Figure 2. Experimental and simulated fluorescence Stokes shift function 5(f) for coumarin 343 in water. The curve marked Aq is a classical molecular dynamics simulation result using a charge distribution difference, calculated by semiempirical quantum chemical methods, between ground and excited states. Also shown is a simulation for a neutral atomic solute with the Lennard-Jones parameters of the water oxygen atom (S°). (From Ref. 4.)... Figure 2. Experimental and simulated fluorescence Stokes shift function 5(f) for coumarin 343 in water. The curve marked Aq is a classical molecular dynamics simulation result using a charge distribution difference, calculated by semiempirical quantum chemical methods, between ground and excited states. Also shown is a simulation for a neutral atomic solute with the Lennard-Jones parameters of the water oxygen atom (S°). (From Ref. 4.)...
Fig. 2.14 (a) Molecular dynamic simulation results of the variation of the free energy change (A G/R) of the chair-to-chair conformational change against of the number of carbon atoms of the spacer group, (b) Probability distribution of the torsional angle obtained at 1000 K for PCHMA... [Pg.70]

Dynamic simulation results at several conditions (see Refs. 7c and 7d). [Pg.337]

The reactor model available in Aspen Dynamics [16] only provides the possibility of changing the coolant temperature. Figure 10.12 shows results dynamic simulation results, for the following scenario the plant is operated at the nominal steady state for lh. Then, the coolant temperature is increased from 413 to 425 K and simulation is continued for 2 h. The maximum temperature inside the reactor... [Pg.308]

Fig. 3.11. Molecular dynamic simulation results for the average fracture stress CTf for various disorder concenrations on triangular lattices, (a) For site dilute Lennard-Jones system (Chakrabarti et al 1986), and (b) for bond dilute spring network (Beale and Srolovitz 1988). Fig. 3.11. Molecular dynamic simulation results for the average fracture stress CTf for various disorder concenrations on triangular lattices, (a) For site dilute Lennard-Jones system (Chakrabarti et al 1986), and (b) for bond dilute spring network (Beale and Srolovitz 1988).
Fig. 3.17. Molecular dynamic simulation results for the onset of fracture growth instablity in a triangular lattice network with Lennard-Jones potential, having an initial crack at the left-side boundary, (a) Initial stages of growth, and (b) late stage unstable growth with large propagation velocities (Abraham et al 1994). Fig. 3.17. Molecular dynamic simulation results for the onset of fracture growth instablity in a triangular lattice network with Lennard-Jones potential, having an initial crack at the left-side boundary, (a) Initial stages of growth, and (b) late stage unstable growth with large propagation velocities (Abraham et al 1994).
Fig. 3.19. Molecular dynamic simulation results for the fracture propagation in amorphous structures (with Lennard-Jones potential) show that the average fracture velocity crosses over to a higher value (ufinai from Uinitiaij indicated by the dotted lines) at the late stages of growth, as the crack size exceeds the typical size (correlation length) of the voids in the network. The inset shows that a corresponding crossover in the fractured surface roughness exponent also occurs along with the crossover in the fracture velocity (from Nakano et al 1995). Fig. 3.19. Molecular dynamic simulation results for the fracture propagation in amorphous structures (with Lennard-Jones potential) show that the average fracture velocity crosses over to a higher value (ufinai from Uinitiaij indicated by the dotted lines) at the late stages of growth, as the crack size exceeds the typical size (correlation length) of the voids in the network. The inset shows that a corresponding crossover in the fractured surface roughness exponent also occurs along with the crossover in the fracture velocity (from Nakano et al 1995).
I I I I I (j) = 0.45, N = 27 Total Viscosity n,-A Hydrodynamic Viscosity ° Brownian Viscosity yy Figure 6.8 Stokesian dynamics simulation results for the steady shear viscosity at 0 = 0.45 also shown are, the separate contributions of the Brownian and hydrodynamic stresses. (From... [Pg.272]

The value of, the Hamaker (dispersion) constant is initially guessed for a given contact angle. This initial guess can be obtained from Molecular Dynamics simulation results (if available). [Pg.203]

Figure 4. Dynamic simulation results as flow rates of a) fresh reactants and b) products... Figure 4. Dynamic simulation results as flow rates of a) fresh reactants and b) products...
In this paper we give an account of our ongoing effort to understand bacterial photosynthesis at the atomic level. First, we describe earlier simulations which investigate the nuclear motion coupled to the primary donor excitation in bacterial reaction centers (RC). Then, we discuss the molecular modeling of the chromophores of the RC of rhodohacter sphaeroides. Finally, we report on our latest molecular dynamics simulation results concerning a RC in a detergent micelle. [Pg.37]

The above presentation leads to the flowsheet shown in Fig. 17.7. The scheme can be simulated now with rigorous units. The sizing of units is also of interest both for the economic evaluation, as well as for preparing the dynamic simulation. Results are available as stream table for the whole process, performance characteristics for units, as well as sizing elements. They can be exported to a spreadsheet, for editing specification sheets or for design purposes. The complete results are not shown here, but the user is encouraged to reproduce the above steps with his favourite simulator. [Pg.650]

The validity of the viscoelastic model (5.32) has been tested against experimental and molecular dynamics simulation results [26, 27, 28]. The detailed comparison has established that the viscoelastic model works remarkably well for wavenumbers k km, where km denotes the first peak position of the static structure factor S k). However, it has also been found that the situation is not so satisfactory for smaller wavenumbers, where the viscoelastic model is shown in some circumstances to yield even qualitatively incorrect results. This failure was attributed to the fact that the single relaxation time model (5.31) cannot describe both the short-time behavior of the memory function, dominated by the so-called binary collisions, and in particular the intermediate and long-time behavior where in the liquid range additional slow processes play an important role (see the next subsection). It is obvious that these conclusions demand a more rigorous consideration of the memory function, which lead to the development of the modern version of the kinetic theory. Nevertheless, the viscoelastic model provides a rather satisfactory account of the main features of microscopic collective density fluctuations in simple liquids at relatively large wavenumbers, and its value should not be undervalued. [Pg.284]

As the dynamic simulation results will show, the preferred control structure depends on the control objectives of the entire process. For example, when the distillate goes to a downstream unit and large variability in its flow rate is undesirable, the control structure should control pressure with condenser heat removal, control level with reflux, and maintain a constant RR. [Pg.192]

Control stmcture CS3 may have a steady-state disadvantage, but it may provide dynamic advantages because of less variability in the vapor distillate flow rate. The dynamic simulation results presented in the next section illustrate these effects. [Pg.198]

The use of molecular dynamics to study the electric double-layer structure started a little over a decade ago, with the hope of determining more accurate structures because the classical description of an electric double layer based on the Poisson-Boltzmann equation is accurate only for low surface potential and dilute electrolytes. The Poisson-Boltzmann equation only considers the electrostatic interactions between the charged surface and ions in the solution, but not the ion-ion interactions in the solution and the finite molecule size, which can be taken into account in molecular dynamics simulations. It was shown [6, 7] that the ion distribution in the near-wall region could be significantly different from the prediction of classical theory. Typical molecular dynamics simulation results of counterion and co-ion concentrations in a nanochannel are shown in Fig. 2a. The ion distribution obtained... [Pg.2297]

AGf (rc), which are therefore based upon the properties of the bulk fluid, and the circles represent the solvation energies computed from the compressible continuum model, AGf (rc) [30]. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulation results from Johnston and Rossky and coworkers [18] for the same system are shown for comparison (solid line). This comparison confirms the usefulness of compressible continuum model predictions [52,51]. [Pg.404]

The last section was devoted to a range of real-world applications treated with ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Results of gas to liquid phase transition simulations, structural and dynamical properties of liquids such as common solvents as well as the emerging neoteric media of ionic liquids were presented. After a short discussion of chemical reactions concerning homogeneous catalysis, we presented an overview of electrochemical reactions and related processes. [Pg.147]

Fig. 5.4 Brownian dynamics simulation results of orientation tensor components distributed along the radial distance of a center-gated disk (From Zheng et al. (2000), with permission from Society of Plastics Engineers Inc.)... Fig. 5.4 Brownian dynamics simulation results of orientation tensor components distributed along the radial distance of a center-gated disk (From Zheng et al. (2000), with permission from Society of Plastics Engineers Inc.)...
Kinetic Separations. As discussed in Chapter 5, carbon molecular sieves have already been used for gas separation that is based on differences in diffusivities of different gas molecules. The same separations should also be possible with carbon nanotubes. To this end, a number of simulation studies have been carried out. Mao and Sinnott (2000 and 2001) have reported molecular dynamics simulation results for diffusion of methane, ethane, n-butane, and isobutene, as well as their binary mixtures, in SWNTs and their bundles. As expected, diffusion of smaller molecules is faster, for example a factor of 25 was obtained for melhane/isobutene in a (8,8) nanotube (Mao and Sinnott, 2001). [Pg.252]

The dynamic simulation results are not definitive because optimal tuning of the control loops has not been completed, nor was it the objective of the present work. The main objective is to evaluate the potential of the modular decomposition approach to synthesize an effective plantwide control structure and to demonstrate the rigor of the mAHP procedure to select an acceptable control structure from among competing alternatives in the presence of competing objectives. [Pg.394]


See other pages where Dynamic Simulation Results is mentioned: [Pg.631]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.1603]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.279]   


SEARCH



Dynamic Results

Dynamic simulation

Dynamical simulations

Resultant Dynamics

Simulated results

Simulation results

© 2024 chempedia.info