Dynamic response: limits

Figure 9.9. Observed dependence of the period of oscillations (see Fig. 9.7) on the crossing angle of the excitation laser beams. Solid line is the theoretical dependence. Dotted lines shows the detection system dynamic response limit.

Static and dynamic property The uses of these foams or porous solids are used in a variety of applications such as energy absorbers in addition to buoyant products. Properties of these materials such as a compressive constitutive law or equation of state is needed in the calculation of the dynamic response of the material to suddenly applied loads. Static testing to provide such data is appealing because of its simplicity, however, the importance of rate effects cannot be determined by this one method alone. Therefore, additional but numerically limited elevated strain-rate tests must be run for this purpose. 

Finite element methods (FEM) are capable of incorporating complex variations in materia stresses in the time varying response. While these methods are widely available, they are quite complex and, in many cases, their use is not warranted due to uncertainties in blast load prediction. The dynamic material properties presented in this section can be used in FEM calculations however, the simplified response limits in the next section may not be suitable. Most FEM codes contain complex failure models which are better indicators of acceptable response. See Chapter 6, Dynamic Analysis Methods, for additional information. 

Because low response limits (less than 2 degrees) will be used, dynamic design stresses will be equal to yield dynamic stresses. Refer to Table 5.A.4. 

All OFDs reported in the literature suffer from spectral interferences, long response times, and narrow dynamic responses. Many of these obstacles exist as a result of limitations due to the properties of UY/visible fluorescent dyes. These dyes typically absorb and fluoresce between 300 and 650 nm, a region susceptible to extensive interference, especially from biomolecules (Figure 7.1). The fluorescence of sample impurities combined with the inner effect of the matrix and polymer support greatly increase the signal interference of the analysis. 

Fuel supply is usually from liquid hydrogen or pressurized gaseous hydrogen. For other fuels, a fuel processor is needed, which includes a reformer, water gas shift reactors and purification reactors, in order to decrease the amount of CO to an acceptable level (below a few tens of ppm), which would otherwise poison the platinum-based catalysts. This equipment is still heavy and bulky and limits the dynamic response of the fuel cell stack, particularly for the electric vehicle in some urban driving cycles. 

For small and slow signals, in STM, the piezoelectric coefficients are the only relevant parameters. At relatively high frequencies, the dynamic response of the piezoelectric materials becomes important. The lowest resonance frequencies of the piezodrive are the limiting factor for the scanning speed. 

It is clear that the application of Langley s method in other polymer systems is essential to settle questions about Me and g in networks satisfactorily. The Ferry composite network method (223, 296) appears to be broadly applicable as well, although requiring special care to minimize slippage prior to introduction of the permanent crosslinks. (One is also still faced with the difficult question of whether g is the same for entanglements in crosslinked networks and in the plateau region of dynamic response.) Based on the limited results of these two methods in unswelled systems, Me values deduced by equilibrium and dynamic response appear to be practically the same. 

The dynamics of the interfacial electron-transfer between Dye 2 and TiOz were examined precisely by laser-induced ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy. Durrant et al.38) employed subpicosecond transient absorption spectroscopy to study the rate of electron injection following optical excitation of Dye 2 adsorbed onto the surface of nanocrystalline Ti02 films. Detailed analysis indicates that the injection is at least biphasic, with ca. 50% occurring in <150 fsec (instrument response limited) and 50% in 1.2 0.2 psec. 

From a dynamic response standpoint, the electronic adjustable-speed pump has a dynamic characteristic that is more suitable in process control applications than those characteristics of control valves. The small amplitude response of an adjustable-speed pump does not contain the dead band or the dead time commonly found in the small amplitude response of the control valve. Nonlinearities associated with friction in the valve and discontinuities in the pneumatic portion of the control valve instrumentation are not present with electronic variable-speed drive technology. As a result, process control with the adjustable-speed pump does not exhibit limit cycles, problems related to low controller gain, and generally degraded process loop performance caused by control valve nonlinearities. 

Openloop Response The openloop responses of a single adiabatic tubular reactor system to +20% step changes in recycle flowrate FR are shown in Figure 6.9. The solid lines represent increases in recycle flow and the dashed lines, decreases. The results show that the system produces limit cycle behavior, alternating between high temperatures and low temperatures. This type of dynamic response is called openloop-unstable behavior in this chapter. 

The process is subjected to a number of disturbances, and the control structure handles all of them quite effectively. Dynamic responses to changes in the setpoint of the temperature controller in the first reactor are shown in Figure 6.109. At 0.1 h, the setpoint is increased from 245 to 255°C. At 3 h, it is decreased to 235°C. Decreasing the temperature in the first reactor results in an increase in throughput. The synthesis gas feedrate, the product rate, and the vent rate all increase. The opposite occurs when the temperature is increased. This indicates that the reaction is equilibrium-limited, not kinetically limited. Decreasing temperature increases the equilibrium constant of exothermic reactions. 

Dynamic analysis of piston flow reactors is fairly straightforward and rather unexciting for incompressible fluids. Piston flow causes the dynamic response of the system to be especially simple. The form of response is a limiting case of that found in real systems. We have seen that piston flow is usually a desirable regime from the viewpoint of reaction yields and selectivities. It turns out to be somewhat undesirable from a control viewpoint since there is no natural dampening of disturbances. 

The plant control system functions to limit temperature rates of change during plant load change and upset events. This is achieved at two different levels. In the time asymptote the control system through control variable set points (with values assigned as a function of steady-state power) takes the plant to a new steady-state condition. The set point values are chosen so that hot side temperatures remain little changed. In the shorter term the control system manages the dynamic response of the plant so that the transition between steady states is stable and with minimal overshoot of process variables. 

It is clear from Fig. 8.15 that it is not possible to measure the IMPS response at sufficiently high frequencies to observe the limit where the quantum efficiency tends towards unity (i.e., where to )) kini). The limitations arise in this case from the dynamic response of the potentiostat. In other cases, attenuation due to the RC time constant of the system may obscure the injection semicircle. The upper limit to the majority carrier injection rate constants that can be obtained by IMPS is around 105 s-1. 

Having obtained the zero frequency limit of the dynamic polarizability i.e., a = Iin, o7 (—wja ), we use a simplified approach to evaluate the screened dynamic response. This is necessary, since the expression given above, Eq. (40), for the polarizability neglects the induced collective effects essentially due to direct and exchange terms of the Coulomb interaction. To treat this screening approximately, we have used the simplified approach of Bertsch et al. [96] to include the induced electron interaction in the Ceo molecule, by a simple RPA type correction [92,95]... 

The frequency windows for the study of photocurrent multiplication by IMPS is set by the dynamic response of the potentiostat (at high frequencies) and by the RC time constant attenuation. The injection rate constant, (first-order), can be calculated from the minimum of the arc, Wmin the upper limit to /cjnj appears to be ca. 10 s [9]. For example, k a for formic acid oxidation on n-CdS has been estimated to be 6 x 10 s [284]. 

Nevertheless, although the dynamic response of materials to oscillatory perturbations has been studied by many authors in many places, information concerning the limitations and precision of these methods is not often found in the literature. The same is true regarding the sources of error and discrepancies between different experimental methods. 

Strictly speaking, there are no static viscoelastic properties as viscoelastic properties are always time-dependent. However, creep and stress relaxation experiments can be considered quasi-static experiments from which the creep compliance and the modulus can be obtained (4). Such tests are commonly applied in uniaxial conditions for simphcity. The usual time range of quasi-static transient measurements is limited to times not less than 10 s. The reasons for this is that in actual experiments it takes a short period of time to apply the force or the deformation to the sample, and a transitory dynamic response overlaps the idealized creep or relaxation experiment. There is no limitation on the maximum time, but usually it is restricted to a maximum of 10" s. In fact, this range of times is complementary, in the corresponding frequency scale, to that of dynamic experiments. Accordingly, to compare these two complementary techniques, procedures of interconversion of data (time frequency or its inverse) are needed. Some of these procedures are discussed in Chapters 6 and 9. 

---