Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dynamic methods function derivation

In the case of finite temperature a similar approach can be used based on the boundary integral method, where instead of the zero temperature Green s function, finite-temperature Green s function derived within TFD formalism is used. Introducing finite-temperature within the thermofield dynamics formalism is based on two steps, doubling of the Hilbert space and Bogolyubov transformations (Takahashi et.ah, 1996 Ademir, 2005). [Pg.175]

Two numerical methods have been used for the solution of the spray equation. In the first method, i.e., the full spray equation method 543 544 the full distribution function / is found approximately by subdividing the domain of coordinates accessible to the droplets, including their physical positions, velocities, sizes, and temperatures, into computational cells and keeping a value of / in each cell. The computational cells are fixed in time as in an Eulerian fluid dynamics calculation, and derivatives off are approximated by taking finite differences of the cell values. This approach suffersfrom two principal drawbacks (a) large numerical diffusion and dispersion... [Pg.325]

The dynamic method for surface force measurement is based on this expression. The h(r) dependence is obtained from film thinning experiments. The derivative is calculated (graphically [14,155,228] or numerically [80,127,232]) and IT(/i) is deduced from Eq. (3.84). Note that the surface force n is written as a function of h only, i.e. thinning is seen as a quasiequilibrium process. [Pg.158]

Calculations of analytic excited state properties for correlated methods have been reported by several groups [107-118]. Excited state dynamic properties from cubic response theory were first obtained by Norman et al. at the SCF level [55] and by Jonsson et al. at the MCSCF [56] level, and in a subsequent study a polarizable continuum model was applied to account for solvation effects [119]. Hattlg et al. presented a general theory for excited state response functions at the CC level using a quasi-energy formulation [120] which was subsequently implemented and applied at the CCSD level [121, 122]. The first ID DFT calculation of dynamic excited state polarizabilities, which we will shortly review here, was presented in [58] for pyrimidine and -tetrazine utilizing the double residue of the cubic response function derived in Section 2.7.3. [Pg.191]

Based on the non-linear plant model, a linear dynamic model is derived, either as a set of transfer functions (identification method), or as a state-space description. The last alternative is offered in advanced packages as ASPEN Dynamics . [Pg.493]

Dynamic controllability analysis. Based on the non-linear plant model, a linear dynamic model is derived, either as a set of transfer functions (identification method), or as a state-space description (matrices A, B, C. D). The last alternative is offered in some advanced packages, as Aspen Dynamics , but the applicability to very large problems should be verified. Then a standard controllability analysis versus frequency can be performed. The main steps are ... [Pg.660]

A fundamental requirement on all of the computational studies on metal surface dynamics is fhe need fo perform simulafions with realistic potentials and in a feasible amounf of fime. To this end, the temperature-accelerated dynamics method [14,74,75] has arisen as a possible approach for reaching the latter limit. With the exception of quanfum simulations, most classical simulations are based on semiempirical potentials derived either from the embedded atom method or effective medium theory [76-78]. However a recent potential energy surface for hydrogen on Cu(l 10) based on density functional theory calculations produced qualitatively different results from those of the embedded atom method including predictions of differenf preferred binding sites [79]. [Pg.144]

Hernadez Daranas et al. have explored the conformations of five-membered ring systems (derivatives of furan), by NMR spectroscopy, molecular dynamic methods (MD) and DFT calculation of J(H,H), J(C.H) and V(C,H) couplings. Couplings were calculated as the functions of pseudorotational phase angles, and compared with the experimental ones. Such an approach allowed identifying ring conformations. [Pg.176]

An alternative approach to obtaining information on polymer dynamics and network structure was developed by Ball, Callaghan, and Samulski and called the j3 function. This experiment amounts to a clever combination of various echoes (both Hahn and solid) Hke the type used to obtain Tj decay curves, and has been employed to probe interproton dipolar interactions. To explain the resultant data, a simple dynamical correlation function was introduced that depended only on the strength of the RDC and a measure of the tube disengagement time. Values extracted from data on PDMS melts were shown to be consistent with those derived via other methods [59]. These treatments were then extended... [Pg.164]

Importantly for direct dynamics calculations, analytic gradients for MCSCF methods [124-126] are available in many standard quantum chemistiy packages. This is a big advantage as numerical gradients require many evaluations of the wave function. The evaluation of the non-Hellmann-Feynman forces is the major effort, and requires the solution of what are termed the coupled-perturbed MCSCF (CP-MCSCF) equations. The large memory requirements of these equations can be bypassed if a direct method is used [233]. Modem computer architectures and codes then make the evaluation of first and second derivatives relatively straightforward in this theoretical framework. [Pg.301]


See other pages where Dynamic methods function derivation is mentioned: [Pg.2352]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.2352]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.1392]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.266]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.185 ]




SEARCH



Derivative function

Derivative method

Dynamic method

Function derived

Functionalization methods

© 2024 chempedia.info