Dynamic controllability analysis

The base case and three alternatives were evaluated by controllability analysis [7, 8], firstly at steady-state. The conclusion is that the loops Q2 (reboiler duty) -1, and SS2 (side-stream flow)-I2 are more interactive than the loop controlling I3 with D2, D4 or Q4. The use of D4 offers the best decoupling of loops. In the base case and alternative B the effect of the variables belonging to S4 on I3 is enhanced by closing the other loops, while in alternatives A and C this effect is hindered. However, at this point there is not a clear distinction between the base case and alternatives. A dynamic controllability analysis is needed. 

Carry out dynamic controllability analysis if necessary (see Chapter 13). 

The smallest value Omin = 32.98 value is large, so that the plant is well-conditioned. Dynamic controllability analysis... 

The primary information in dynamic controllability analysis is similar to the steady-state analysis, namely the gains for manipulated variables and disturbances on the controlled variables, this time plotted against frequency. This can be obtained from a state-space description (matrices A, B, C, D) or by identification. 

However, at this point there is not a clear distinction between the base-case and alternatives, although we expected a difference because of the very different units involved in recycles. A dynamic controllability analysis is needed. 

Figure 17.19 Open loop dynamic responses in the three alternatives 17.3.6 Dynamic controllability analysis...

Firstly, the implementation of three PI controllers has been tried. Figure 17.22a shows the results obtained in attempting to control the good impurity I3 with the structure Q2-Ii, SS2-I2 and D2-I3. The attempt failed, the system cannot be stabilised because of heavy interactions. As shown, the impurity I3 accumulates and exceeds its bound. The input magnitude of D2 is indeed too small to control I3, as was indicated by the analysis of the closed loop performance. Changing D2-I3 with D4-I3 does not change fundamentally the situation. Thus, the simultaneous control of the three impurities is not possible. This result was not predictable from the steady-state analysis, but it has been foreseen by the dynamic controllability analysis. Thus, it was decided to let the loop SS2-I2 on manual. 

Dynamic controllability analysis. A tractable linear dynamic model can be built-up either by means of transfer functions or by state-space description. Then a standard controllability analysis versus frequency can be performed. Here the main steps are ... 

We now derive the time-domain solutions of first and second order differential equations. It is not that we want to do the inverse transform, but comparing the time-domain solution with its Laplace transform helps our learning process. What we hope to establish is a better feel between pole positions and dynamic characteristics. We also want to see how different parameters affect the time-domain solution. The results are useful in control analysis and in measuring model parameters. At the end of the chapter, dead time, reduced order model, and the effect of zeros will be discussed. 

In an NMR analysis of the effects of /-irradiation induced degradation on a specific polyurethane (PU) elastomer system, Maxwell and co-workers [87] used a combination of both H and 13C NMR techniques, and correlated these with mechanical properties derived from dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). 1H NMR was used to determine spin-echo decay curves for three samples, which consisted of a control and two samples exposed to different levels of /-irradiation in air. These results were deconvoluted into three T2 components that represented T2 values which could be attributed to an interfacial domain between hard and soft segments of the PU, the PU soft segment, and the sol... 

To highlight the relationship of the matrices A and to the quantities discussed in Section VILA (Dynamics of Metabolic Systems) and Section VII.B (Metabolic Control Analysis), we briefly outline an alternative approach to the parameterization of the Jacobian matrix. Note the correspondence between the saturation parameter and the scaled elasticity ... 

In dynamic thermogravimetric analysis a sample is subjected to conditions of predetermined, carefully controlled continuous increase in temperature that is invariably found to be linear with time. 

The controllability analysis was conducted in two parts. The theoretical control properties of the three schemes were first predicted through the use of the singular value decomposition (SVD) technique, and then closed-loop dynamic simulations were conducted to analyze the control behavior of each system and to compare those results with the theoretical predictions provided by SVD. 

In this chapter, we have expounded our comprehensive approach to the dynamical control of decay and decoherence. Our analysis of dynamically modified coupling between a qubit and a bath has resulted in the universal formula (4.49) for the dynamically modified decay rate into a zero-temperature bath, as well as its counterparts (4.114) for excited- and ground-state dynamical decay into finite-temperature baths. This ground-state dynamically induced decay results from RWA violation by ultrafast modulation. 

Thermal analysis involves techniques in which a physical property of a material is measured against temperature at the same time the material is exposed to a controlled temperature program. A wide range of thermal analysis techniques have been developed since the commercial development of automated thermal equipment as listed in Table 1. Of these the best known and most often used for polymers are thermogravimetry (tg), differential thermal analysis (dta), differential scanning calorimetry (dsc), and dynamic mechanical analysis (dma). 

The physical properties of barrier dressings were evaluated using the Seiko Model DMS 210 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer Instrument (see Fig. 2.45). Referring to Fig. 2.46, dynamic mechanical analysis consists of oscillating (1 Hz) tensile force of a material in an environmentally (37°C) controlled chamber (see Fig. 2.47) to measure loss modulus (E") and stored modulus (E ). Many materials including polymers and tissue are viscoelastic, meaning that they deform (stretch or pull) with applied force and return to their original shape with time. The effect is a function of the viscous property (E") within the material that resists deformation and the elastic property (E )... 

Thus the linear analysis predicts that the dynamic controllability of the FS2 process is much better than that of the FS1 process. Even though steady-state economics do not favor using a furnace, the actual profitability of the process may be higher if a furnace is used. This is particularly true for systems that exhibit large reactor gains. 

Thermal analysis is a group of techniques in which a physical property of a substance is measured as a function of temperature when the sample is subjected to a controlled temperature program. Single techniques, such as thermogravimetry (TG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), dielectric thermal analysis, etc., provide important information on the thermal behaviour of materials. However, for polymer characterisation, for instance in case of degradation, further analysis is required, particularly because all of the techniques listed above mainly describe materials only from a physical point of view. A hyphenated thermal analyser is a powerful tool to yield the much-needed additional chemical information. In this paper we will concentrate on simultaneous thermogravimetric techniques. 

Many methods have been developed for model analysis for instance, bifurcation and stability analysis [88, 89], parameter sensitivity analysis [90], metabolic control analysis [16, 17, 91] and biochemical systems analysis [18]. One highly important method for model analysis and especially for large models, such as many silicon cell models, is model reduction. Model reduction has a long history in the analysis of biochemical reaction networks and in the analysis of nonlinear dynamics (slow and fast manifolds) [92-104]. In all cases, the aim of model reduction is to derive a simplified model from a larger ancestral model that satisfies a number of criteria. In the following sections we describe a relatively new form of model reduction for biochemical reaction networks, such as metabolic, signaling, or genetic networks. 

In the above definitions, 9 represents a set of parameters of the system, having constant values. These parameters are also called control parameters. The set of the system s variables forms a representation space called the phase space [32]. A point in the phase space represents a unique state of the dynamic system. Thus, the evolution of the system in time is represented by a curve in the phase space called trajectory or orbit for the flow or the map, respectively. The number of variables needed to describe the system s state, which is the number of initial conditions needed to determine a unique trajectory, is the dimension of the system. There are also dynamic systems that have infinite dimension. In these cases, the processes are usually described by differential equations with partial derivatives or time-delay differential equations, which can be considered as a set of infinite in number ordinary differential equations. The fundamental property of the phase space is that trajectories can never intersect themselves or each other. The phase space is a valuable tool in dynamic systems analysis since it is easier to analyze the properties of a dynamic system by determining... 

---