Electron correlation dynamic

In Table 3 we have listed the results of a basis set and correlation study for the hyperpolarizability dispersion coefficients. In a previous investigation of the basis set effects on the dispersion coefficients for the first hyperpolarizability (3 of ammonia [22] we found quite different trends for the static hyperpolarizability and for the dispersion coefficients. While the static hyperpolarizability was very sensitive to the inclusion of diffuse functions, the dispersion coefficients remained almost unchanged on augmentation of the basis set with additional diffuse functions, but the results obtained with the CC2 and CCSD models, which include dynamic electron correlation, showed large changes with an increase of the... 

In this and the following sections we will introduce the Hartree-Fock (HF) approximation and some of the fundamental concepts intimately connected with it, such as exchange, selfinteraction, dynamical and non-dynamical electron correlation. We will meet many of these terms again in our later discussions on related topics in the framework of DFT. The HF... 

Keep in mind that dynamic electron correlation is always connected to the fact that electrons interact as charged species. 

Accounting for Dynamical Electron Correlation An Important Step Towards Accurate Predictions... 

Two different correlation effects can be distinguished. The first one, called dynamical electron correlation, comes from the fact that in the Hartree-Fock approximation the instantaneous electron repulsion is not taken into account. The nondynamical electron correlation arises when several electron configurations are nearly degenerate and are strongly mixed in the wave function. 

At the HF level, the value of the C=C bond length is clearly underestimated. The inclusion of electron correlation at different levels of calculation leads to values in closer agreement with experiment. The value of the C—C bond length is less sensitive to the inclusion of electron correlation. As a consequence of this fact, the CC bond alternation (the difference between CC single and double bond lengths) is overestimated at the HF level. The inclusion of dynamical electron correlation through MP calculations corrects this error. A very similar result is obtained at the CASSCF level of calculation31. 

Because of the inherent limitations of such semiempirical procedures, they can only be relied upon for yielding predictions for a limited set of data, the range of which includes the set of experimental data used for their parametrization. As such data are less abundant for open-shell species, such as radical ions, it is not surprising that there are examples of dramatic failures of semiempirical methods in predicting their electronic spectra, some of which will be discussed later. Ab initio methods are not burdened by these limitations but, as mentioned above, they require additional computations to account for dynamic electron correlation. 

It is possible to divide electron correlation as dynamic and nondynamic correlations. Dynamic correlation is associated with instant correlation between electrons occupying the same spatial orbitals and the nondynamic correlation is associated with the electrons avoiding each other by occupying different spatial orbitals. Thus, the ground state electronic wave function cannot be described with a single Slater determinant (Figure 3.3) and multiconfiguration self-consistent field (MCSCF) procedures are necessary to include dynamic electron correlation. 

The CCS, CC2, CCSD, CC3 hierarchy has been designed specially for the calculation of frequency-dependent properties. In this hierarchy, a systematic improvement in the description of the dynamic electron correlation is obtained at each level. For example, comparing CCS, CC2, CCSD, CC3 with FCI singlet and triplet excitation energies showed that the errors decreased by about a factor 3 at each level in the coupled cluster hierarchy [18]. The CC3 error was as small as 0.016 eV and the accuracy of the CC3 excitation energies was comparable to the one of the CCSDT model [18]. 

---