Driving force linear

Log arithmic-Mean Driving Force. As noted eadier, linear operating lines occur if all concentrations involved stay low. Where it is possible to assume that the equiUbrium line is linear, it can be shown that use of the logarithmic mean of the terminal driving forces is theoretically correct. When the overall gas-film coefficient is used to express the rate of absorption, the calculation reduces to solution of the equation... 

Fig. 9. Uptake curves for N2 in two samples of carbon molecular sieve showing conformity with diffusion model (eq. 24) for sample 1 (A), and with surface resistance model (eq. 26) for example 2 (0)j LDF = linear driving force. Data from ref. 18.

This rate equation must satisfy the boundary conditions imposed by the equiUbrium isotherm and it must be thermodynamically consistent so that the mass transfer rate falls to 2ero at equiUbrium. It maybe a linear driving force expression of the form... 

Fig. 15. Theoretical breakthrough curves for a nonlinear (Langmuir) system showing the comparison between the linear driving force (—), pore diffusion (--------------------), and intracrystalline diffusion (-) models based on the Glueckauf approximation (eqs. 40—45). From Ref. 7.

Linear Driving Force Approximation Simplified expressions can also be used for an approximate description of adsorption in terms of rate coefficients for both extrapai ticle and intraparticle mass transfer controlling. As an approximation, the rate of adsorption on a particle can be written as ... 

The linear driving force (LDF) approximation is obtained when the driving force is expressed as a concentration difference. It was originally developed to describe packed-bed dynamics under linear eqm-librium conditions [Glueckauf, Trans. Far Soc., 51, 1540 (1955)]. This form is exact for a nonlinear isotherm only when external mass transfer is controlling. However, it can also be used for nonlinear sys-... 

Overall Resistance With a linear isotherm (R = 1), the overall mass transfer resistance is the sum of intraparticle and extraparticle resistances. Thus, the overall LDF coefficient for use with a particle-side driving force (column 2 in Table 16-12) is ... 

Axial Dispersion Effects In adsorption bed calculations, axial dispersion effects are typically accounted for by the axial diffusionhke term in the bed conservation equations [Eqs. (16-51) and (16-52)]. For nearly linear isotherms (0.5 < R < 1.5), the combined effects of axial dispersion and mass-transfer resistances on the adsorption behavior of packed beds can be expressed approximately in terms of an apparent rate coefficient for use with a fluid-phase driving force (column 1, Table 16-12) ... 

Figure 16-27 compares the various constant pattern solutions for R = 0.5. The curves are of a similar shape. The solution for reaction kinetics is perfectly symmetrical. The cui ves for the axial dispersion fluid-phase concentration profile and the linear driving force approximation are identical except that the latter occurs one transfer unit further down the bed. The cui ve for external mass transfer is exactly that for the linear driving force approximation turned upside down [i.e., rotated 180° about cf= nf = 0.5, N — Ti) = 0]. The hnear driving force approximation provides a good approximation for both pore diffusion and surface diffusion. 

FIG. 16-27 Constant pattern solutions for R = 0.5. Ordinant is cfor nfexcept for axial dispersion for which individual curves are labeled a, axial dispersion h, external mass transfer c, pore diffusion (spherical particles) d, surface diffusion (spherical particles) e, linear driving force approximation f, reaction kinetics. [from LeVan in Rodrigues et al. (eds.), Adsorption Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dor drecht, The Nether lands, 1989 r eprinted with permission.]... 

The rectangular isotherm has received special attention. For this, many of the constant patterns are developed fuUy at the bed inlet, as shown for external mass transfer [Klotz, Chem. Rev.s., 39, 241 (1946)], pore diffusion [Vermeulen, Adv. Chem. Eng., 2, 147 (1958) Hall et al., Jnd. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 5, 212 (1966)], the linear driving force approximation [Cooper, Jnd. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 4, 308 (1965)], reaction kinetics [Hiester and Vermeulen, Chem. Eng. Progre.s.s, 48, 505 (1952) Bohart and Adams, J. Amei Chem. Soc., 42, 523 (1920)], and axial dispersion [Coppola and LeVan, Chem. Eng. ScL, 38, 991 (1983)]. 

The simplest isotherm is /if = cf corresponding to R = 1. For this isotherm, the rate equation for external mass transfer, the linear driving force approximation, or reaction kinetics, can be combined with Eq. (16-130) to obtain... 

Isocratic Elution In the simplest case, feed with concentration cf is apphed to the column for a time tp followed by the pure carrier fluid. Under trace conditions, for a hnear isotherm with external mass-transfer control, the linear driving force approximation or reaction kinetics (see Table 16-12), solution of Eq. (16-146) gives the following expression for the dimensionless solute concentration at the column outlet ... 

The basic assumptions of fracture mechanics are (1) that the material behaves as a linear elastic isotropic continuum and (2) the crack tip inelastic zone size is small with respect to all other dimensions. Here we will consider the limitations of using the term K = YOpos Ttato describe the mechanical driving force for crack extension of small cracks at values of stress that are high with respect to the elastic limit. 

The same chemical mechanisms and driving forces presented for phenol-formaldehyde resins apply to resorcinol resins. Resorcinol reacts readily with formaldehyde to produce resins (Fig. 2) which harden at ambient temperatures if formaldehyde is added. The initial condensation reaction, in which A-stage liquid resins are formed, leads to the formation of linear condensates only when the resorcinol/formaldehyde molar ratio is approximately 1 1 [119]. This reflects the reactivity of the two main reactive sites (positions 4 and 6) of resorcinol [120]. However, reaction with the remaining reactive but sterically hindered site (2-positiori) between the hydroxyl functions also occurs [119]. In relation to the weights of resorcinol-formaldehyde condensates which are isolated and on a molar basis, the proportion of 4- plus 6-linkages relative to 2-linkages is 10.5 1. However, it must be noted that the first-mentioned pair represents two condensa-... 

Whenever die rich and the lean phases are not in equilibrium, an interphase concentration gradient and a mass-transfer driving force develop leading to a net transfer of the solute from the rich phase to the lean phase. A common method of describing the rates of interphase mass transfer involves the use of overall mass-transfer coefficients which are based on the difference between the bulk concentration of the solute in one phase and its equilibrium concentration in the other phase. Suppose that the bulk concentradons of a pollutant in the rich and the lean phases are yi and Xj, respectively. For die case of linear equilibrium, the pollutant concnetration in the lean phase which is in equilibrium with y is given by... 

We have covered a body of material in this chapter that deals with movement of mass along gradients and between phases. We have examined the commonalities and differences between linear driving forces, net rates of adsorption, and permeation. Each has the common feature that reaction is not involved but does involve transport between apparently well-defined regions. We move now to chemically reactive systems in anticipation of eventually analyzing problems that involve mass transfer and reaction. 

The most important driving forces for the motion of ionic defects and electrons in solids are the migration in an electric field and the diffusion under the influence of a chemical potential gradient. Other forces, such as magnetic fields and temperature gradients, are commonly much less important in battery-type applications. It is assumed that the fluxes under the influence of an electric field and a concentration gradient are linearly superimposed, which... 

If it is assumed that each element resides for the same time interval te in the surface, equation 10.115 gives the overall mean rate of transfer. It may be noted that the rate is a linear- function of the driving force expressed as a concentration difference, as in the two-film theory, but that it is proportional to the diffusivity raised to the power of 0.5 instead of unity. 

These relations between the various coefficients are valid provided that the transfer rate is linearly related to the driving force and that the equilibrium relationship is a straight line. They are therefore applicable for the two-film theory, and for any instant of time for the penetration and film-penetration theories. In general, application to time-averaged coefficients obtained from the penetration and film-penetration theories is not permissible because the condition at the interface will be time-dependent unless all of the resistance lies in one of the phases. 

The left-hand side of equation 10.157 is the rate of change of concentration with height for unit driving force, and is therefore a measure of the efficiency of the column and, in this way. a high value of (hD aCT)/G is associated with a high efficiency. The reciprocal of this quantity is G /(ho aCT) which has linear dimensions and is known as the height of the transfer unit Ht (HTU). 

The first synthesized pentafluorophenylgold(I) complex was [Au(C6F5)PPh3[ obtained by the reaction of [AuClPPhs] and CgFsMgBr [30-32]. This complex was at the same time the first characterized [33] by X-ray studies showing the common nearly linear distribution of the phosphorous and the ipso carbon atom (178(1)°). Nowadays, there are many methods of obtaining this complex, in many cases as a by-product of some reaction and, in other cases, its formation is the driving force of the reaction. We will see examples of both in this chapter. 

The factors to consider in the selection of crossflow filtration include the flow configuration, tangential linear velocity, transmembrane pressure drop (driving force), separation characteristics of the membrane (permeability and pore size), size of particulates relative to the membrane pore dimensions, low protein-binding ability, and hydrodynamic conditions within the flow module. Again, since particle-particle and particle-membrane interactions are key, broth conditioning (ionic strength, pH, etc.) may be necessary to optimize performance. 

---