Structure, three-dimensional domains

Gronemeyer, H. (2000) Nuclear receptor ligand-binding domains three-dimensional structures, molecular interactions and pharmacological implications. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 21, 381-388. 

CBH II 447 ABB -core aa sequence in part from protein and in full from gene (cbh2), number of SS bridges, region of O-glycosylation, types of carbohydrate, papain cleavage site, hydrophobic cluster analysis, SAXS on whole CBH II and head domain, three dimensional structure of head by X-ray diffraction... 

Marchler-Bauer A, Panchenko AR, Shoemaker BA et al (2002) CDD a database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 30 281-283... 

As more protein structures became available it was observed that some contained more that one distinct region, with each region often having a separate function. Each of these region is usually known as a domain, a domain being defined as a polypeptide chain that can folc independently into a stable three-dimensional structure. 

Domain Sequence of a polypeptide chain that can independently fold into a stable three-dimensional structure... 

Domains are formed by different combinations of secondary structure elements and motifs. The a helices and p strands of the motifs are adjacent to each other in the three-dimensional structure and connected by loop regions. Sequentially adjacent motifs, or motifs that are formed from consecutive regions of the primary structure of a polypeptide chain, are usually close together in the three-dimensional structure (Figure 2.20). Thus to a first approximation a polypeptide chain can be considered as a sequential arrangement of these simple motifs. The number of such combinations found in proteins is limited, and some combinations seem to be structurally favored. Thus similar domain structures frequently occur in different proteins with different functions and with completely different amino acid sequences. 

Polypeptide chains are folded into one or several discrete units, domains, which are the fundamental functional and three-dimensional structural units. The cores of domains are built up from combinations of small motifs of secondary structure, such as a-loop-a, P-loop-p, or p-a-p motifs. Domains are classified into three main structural groups a structures, where the core is built up exclusively from a helices p structures, which comprise antiparallel p sheets and a/p structures, where combinations of p-a-P motifs form a predominantly parallel p sheet surrounded by a helices. 

Figure 3.6 Four-helix bundles frequently occur as domains in a proteins. The arrangement of the a helices is such that adjacent helices in the amino acid sequence are also adjacent in the three-dimensional structure. Some side chains from all four helices are buried in the middle of the bundle, where they form a hydrophobic core, (a) Schematic representation of the path of the polypeptide chain in a four-helrx-bundle domain. Red cylinders are a helices, (b) Schematic view of a projection down the bundle axis. Large circles represent the main chain of the a helices small circles are side chains. Green circles are the buried hydrophobic side chains red circles are side chains that are exposed on the surface of the bundle, which are mainly hydrophilic.

Most of the known antiparallel p structures, including the immunoglobulins and a number of different enzymes, have barrels that comprise at least one Greek key motif. An example is 7 crystallin, which has two consecutive Greek key motifs in each of two barrel domains. These four motifs are homologous in terms of both their three-dimensional structure and amino acid sequence and are thus evolutionarily related. 

Boumann, U., et al. Three-dimensional structure of the alkaline protease of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a two-domain protein with a calcium binding parallel beta roll motif. EMBO J. 12 3357-3364, 1993. 

The 434 Cro molecule contains 71 amino acid residues that show 48% sequence identity to the 69 residues that form the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of 434 repressor. It is not surprising, therefore, that their three-dimensional structures are very similar (Figure 8.11). The main difference lies in two extra amino acids at the N-terminus of the Cro molecule. These are not involved in the function of Cro. By choosing the 434 Cro and repressor molecules for his studies, Harrison eliminated the possibility that any gross structural difference of these two molecules can account for their different DNA-binding properties. 

In contrast to Myc, Max can form homodimers that bind tightly to DNA. These homodimers recognize the same consensus sequence as members of the b/HLH family, 5 -CANNTG-3. The three-dimensional structure of the b/HLH/zip domain of Max complexed with a DNA fragment containing the sequence 5 -CACGTG-3 has been determined by the group of Stephen... 

Serine proteinases such as chymotrypsin and subtilisin catalyze the cleavage of peptide bonds. Four features essential for catalysis are present in the three-dimensional structures of all serine proteinases a catalytic triad, an oxyanion binding site, a substrate specificity pocket, and a nonspecific binding site for polypeptide substrates. These four features, in a very similar arrangement, are present in both chymotrypsin and subtilisin even though they are achieved in the two enzymes in completely different ways by quite different three-dimensional structures. Chymotrypsin is built up from two p-barrel domains, whereas the subtilisin structure is of the a/p type. These two enzymes provide an example of convergent evolution where completely different loop regions, attached to different framework structures, form similar active sites. 

Ras proteins and the catalytic domain ofGa have similar three-dimensional structures... 

Proteins are usually separated into two distinct functional classes passive structural materials, which are built up from long fibers, and active components of cellular machinery in which the protein chains are arranged in small compact domains, as we have discussed in earlier chapters. In spite of their differences in structure and function, both these classes of proteins contain a helices and/or p sheets separated by regions of irregular structure. In most cases the fibrous proteins contain specific repetitive amino acid sequences that are necessary for their specific three-dimensional structure. 

Figure 15.17 The three-dimensional structure of an intact IgG. Hinge regions connecting the Fab arms with the Fc stem are relatively flexible, despite the presence of disulfide bonds in this region linking the heavy and light chains. Carbohydrate residues that bridge the two Ch2 domains are not shown. (Courtesy of A. McPherson and L. Harris, Nature 360 369-372, 1992, by copyright permission of Macmillan Magazines Limited.)...

IgG antibody molecules are composed of two light chains and two heavy chains joined together by disulfide bonds. Each light chain has one variable domain and one constant domain, while each heavy chain has one variable and three constant domains. All of the domains have a similar three-dimensional structure known as the immunoglobulin fold. The Fc stem of the molecule is formed by constant domains from each of the heavy chains, while two Fab arms are formed by constant and variable domains from both heavy and light chains. The hinge region between the stem and the arms is flexible and allows the arms to move relative to each other and to the stem. 

When they form the three subunits A, B, and C of the asymmetric unit, the identical polypeptides adopt different three-dimensional structures. The C subunit in particular is distinct from the A and B structures, its hinge region assuming a different conformation so that the S and P domains are... 

---