Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Display Concentrator Unit

A separate Display Concentrator Unit (DCU), which provides an interface to all associated sensors. The DCUs inclnde comparators which determine if there is a discrepancy between the No. 1 and No. 2 system infonnation being fed to them. The case study parameters being compared are ... [Pg.17]

As can be seen in Fig. 1.8, each PFD can be supplied with altitude data from either Display Concentrator Unit (DCU), and in this case study it is assumed to be controlled purely by the Reversion switch (NORM, All on 1, or All on 2). It is assumed that the PFD displays the source of the data (i.e. DCUl or DCU2) to allow the flight crew to verify operation of the Reversion switch. [Pg.75]

Fig. 18 Finite element modeling of steady-state concentration profiles in the human eye[241] from a hypothetical device that releases from one side only, (a) Device releases towards the front (b) device releases towards the back. Arbitrary concentration units (scale, inset a) highest concentration marked x. Contours are shown for x-z plane and for x-y plane through the center, x-z portion of finite element mesh displayed (inset b) device (opaque to diffusion) represented by voided region. (Adapted from Ref. 244.)... [Pg.451]

As a side aspect, the HPLC-Raman correlation results allow us to calibrate the RRS instruments in terms of carotenoid concentration. According to the regression analysis, the cumulative skin carotenoid content c, measured in pg per g of skin tissue, is linked to the height of the C=C RRS skin carotenoid intensity, I, via c [pg/g]=4.3 x 10 5=/ [photon counts]. Integrating the RRS spectra with the instrument s data acquiring software therefore allows us to display skin carotenoid content directly in concentration units, i.e., in pg carotenoid content per g of tissue. [Pg.104]

In Section 3.4 we have displayed many different modes for characterizing the chemical potential of a given species in a nonideal solution. While these various descriptions all look different, surely all physical predictions must be independent of the particular standard or reference state which has been chosen, and surely they cannot be allowed to depend on the choice of concentration units. We now adopt restrictions that guarantee that the chemical potential of any species i in any solution relative to the standard potential shall indeed be unique, i.e., invariant under any change in choice of concentration units. [Pg.170]

A very useful format in which to display air quality data for analysis is that of Fig. 4-8, which has as its abscissa averaging time expressed in two different time units and, as its ordinate, concentration of the pollutant at the receptor. This type of chart is called an arrowhead chart and includes enough information to characterize fully the variability of concentration at the receptor. [Pg.53]

The rate of polymerization with styrene-type monomers is directly proportional to the number of particles formed. In batch reactors most of the particles are nucleated early in the reaction and the number formed depends on the emulsifier available to stabilize these small particles. In a CSTR operating at steady-state the rate of nucleation of new particles depends on the concentration of free emulsifier, i.e. the emulsifier not adsorbed on other surfaces. Since the average particle size in a CSTR is larger than the average size at the end of the batch nucleation period, fewer particles are formed in a CSTR than if the same recipe were used in a batch reactor. Since rate is proportional to the number of particles for styrene-type monomers, the rate per unit volume in a CSTR will be less than the interval-two rate in a batch reactor. In fact, the maximum CSTR rate will be about 60 to 70 percent the batch rate for such monomers. Monomers for which the rate is not as strongly dependent on the number of particles will display less of a difference between batch and continuous reactors. Also, continuous reactors with a particle seed in the feed may be capable of higher rates. [Pg.9]

Figure 17-3 shows the range of pH and hydronium ion concentrations. The measurement of pH is a routine operation in most laboratories. Litmus paper, which turns red when dipped in acidic solution and blue when dipped in basic solution, gives a quick, qualitative indication of acidity. As Figure 17-4 shows, approximate measures of pH can be done using pH paper. Universal pH paper displays a range of colors in response to different pH values and is accurate to about 0.5 pH unit. For quantitative pH determinations, scientists use pH meters. [Pg.1215]

In THF at 20°C, dendritic monomers 3a-3c show absorption bands at 335 and 278 nm, due to the focal 1,4-diethynylbenzene unit and the dendritic wedges, respectively. On the other hand, dendritic macromolecular rods 2a-2c display a strong absorption band in the visible region (400-460 nm), characteristic of an extended electronic conjugation in the backbone. Upon excitation of the conjugated backbone at 425 nm in THF (abs425 nm = 0.01) at 20°C, 2a-2c show a strong blue fluorescence at 454 nm, where the quantum yield ( FL) has been evaluated to be virtually 100%. Of much interest is the fact that the fl>FL value of 2c stays at nearly 100%, even when the solution is concentrated until the... [Pg.429]

For patients at home, these sensors have been marketed (by Medisense) to look like a typical credit card a sample of blood is placed on an uncovered portion on the flat of one side, and a readout obtained when the sensor is plugged into a portable display unit. This type of sensor can yield an accurate determination of [glucose] in the concentration range 0-25 mmol dm within about 20-30 s. [Pg.190]

Source Triphenyl phosphate was identified as a component in outer covers of brand-new computer video display units. Concentrations were estimated to be 8 to 10 and 0.3 to 0.5 wt % in 4 and 6 video display units, respectively. The concentrations of triphenyl phosphate in the remaining 8 video display units were <0.02 wt % (Carlsson et al., 2000). [Pg.1142]


See other pages where Display Concentrator Unit is mentioned: [Pg.85]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.187]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.16 ]




SEARCH



Concentration units

Unit display

© 2024 chempedia.info