Dispersion toughening

T. N. Tiegs, etal., Dispersion-Toughened Composites, in Ceram. Tech, for Adv. Heat Eng. Proj. Semiann. Prog. Rep. for April through Sept. 1988, ORNL/TM-11116, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1989, pp. 92-97. 

Tho objectives of the program "Dispersion-Toughened Silicon Nitride" carried out within the scope of the Ceramic Technology for Advanced Heat Engines (CTAHE) program are to develop an advanced toughened silicon nitride composite and a process for near net shape part fabrication. The work on this program was Initiated In 1985. 

Mechanical Properties. Properties of typical grades of PBT, either as unfiUed neat resin, glass-fiber fiUed, and FR-grades, are set out in Table 8. This table also includes impact-modified grades which incorporate dispersions of elastomeric particles inside the semicrystalHne polyester matrix. These dispersions act as effective toughening agents which greatly improve impact properties. The mechanisms are not fiiUy understood in all cases. The subject has been discussed in detail (171) and the particular case of impact-modified polyesters such as PBT has also been discussed (172,173). 

Blends of isobutylene polymers with thermoplastic resins are used for toughening these compounds. High density polyethylene and isotactic polypropylene are often modified with 5 to 30 wt % polyisobutylene. At higher elastomer concentration the blends of butyl-type polymers with polyolefins become more mbbery in nature, and these compositions are used as thermoplastic elastomers (98). In some cases, a halobutyl phase is cross-linked as it is dispersed in the polyolefin to produce a highly elastic compound that is processible in thermoplastic mol ding equipment (99) (see Elastomers, synthetic-thermoplastic). ... 

The important factors that affect the rubber toughening are (1) interfacial adhesion, (2) nature of the matrix, (3) concentration of the rubber phase, and (4) shape and size of the rubber particles. In the PS-XNBR blend containing OPS, due to the reaction between oxazoline groups of OPS and carboxylic groups of XNBR, the interfacial adhesion increases and as a result, the minor rubber phase becomes more dispersed. The immiscible blend needs an optimum interfacial adhesion and particle size for maximum impact property. In PS-XNBR, a very small concentration of OPS provides this optimum interfacial adhesion and particle size. The interfacial adhesion beyond this point does not necessarily result in further toughening. 

In order to obtain a finely sized dispersed phase in the PET matrix, the use of reactive compatibilization has been found to be important. Small dispersed rubber particles and a small interparticle distance are necessary to induce high toughness. For effective rubber toughening of PET, it is important that the rubber domains be less than 3 im in diameter (and preferably less than 1 xm) and that the interparticle distance be between 50-300 nm. 

Reactive impact modifiers are preferred for toughening of PET since these form a stable dispersed phase by grafting to the PET matrix. Non-reactive elastomers can be dispersed into PET by intensive compounding but may coalesce downstream in the compounder. Reactive impact modifiers have functionalized end groups. Functionalization serves two purposes - first, to bond the impact modifier to the polymer matrix, and secondly to modify the interfacial energy between the polymer matrix and the impact modifier for enhanced dispersion. Some examples of commercially available reactive impact modifiers for PET are shown in Table 14.3. An example of a non-reactive elastomer that can be used in combination with reactive impact modifiers is ethylene methyl acrylate (EMA), such as the Optema EMA range of ethylene methyl acrylates manufactured by the Exxon-Mobil Chemical Company (see Section 4.2). 

Figure 14.8 Grafting reactions between PET end groups and glycidyl-methacrylate-containing rubber tougheners. This reaction is critical in ensuring that the reactive elastomeric toughener becomes grafted to the PET matrix and forms smaller, uniform domains of a rubber dispersed phase...

Pecorini and Calvert [28] attribute the role of small particles and a small interparticle distance to inducing high toughness in PET by promoting massive shear yielding in the matrix. Their study showed that the non-reactive impact modifier gives a system in which the rubber phase is not well dispersed. It was shown that this is not effective in toughening PET at levels of either 10 or 20%. The... 

A twin-screw extruder is generally preferred for producing rubber-toughened, glass-filled PET compounds for injection moulding applications. The PET and impact modifier are added at the throat while the glass reinforcement is added downstream. The size of the rubber domains will depend on the amount of energy and the capability of the equipment used for dispersion. 

---