Directional property orthotropic

Because the fibers generally are anisotropic, they tend to be deposited on the wire in layers under shear. There is Htde tendency for fibers to be oriented in an out-of-plane direction, except for small undulations where one fiber crosses or passes beneath another. The layered stmcture results in the different properties measured in the thickness direction as compared to those measured in the in-plane direction. The orthotropic behavior of paper is observed in most paper properties and especially in the electrical and mechanical properties. 

Orientation of reinforcement The behavior of RPs is dominated by the arrangement and the interaction of the stiff, strong fibers with the less stiff, weaker plastic matrix. The features of the structure and the construction determine the behavior of RPs that is important to the designer. A major advantage is the fact that directional properties can be maximized in the plane of the sheet. As shown in Fig. 8-55 they can be isotropic, orthotropic, etc. Basic design theories of combining actions of plastics and reinforcements... 

The anisotropic viscoelastic properties in shear of the meniscus have been determined by subjecting discs of meniscal tissue to sinusoidal torsional loading [35](Table B2.8). The specimens were cut in the three directions of orthotropic symmetry, i.e. circumferential, axial and radial. A definite correlation is seen with the orientation of the fibers and both the magnitude of the dynamic modulus IG I and the phase angle 8. 

An orthotropic body has material properties that are different in three mutually perpendicular directions at a point in the body and, further, has three mutually perpendicular planes of material property symmetry. Thus, the properties depend on orientation at a point in the body. 

The foregoing example is but one of the difficulties encountered in analysis of orthotropic materials with different properties in tension and compression. The example is included to illustrate how basic information in principal material coordinates can be transformed to other useful coordinate directions, depending on the stress field under consideration. Such transformations are simply indications that the basic information. 

Because of the analytical complications involving the stiffnesses Ai6, A26, D g, and D26, a laminate is sometimes desired that does not have these stiffnesses. Laminates can be made with orthotropic layers that have principal material directions aligned with the laminate axes. If the thicknesses, locations, and material properties of the laminae are symmetric about the middle surface of the laminate, there is no coupling between bending and extension. A general example is shown in Table 4-2. Note that the material property symmetry requires equal [Q j], of the two layers that are placed at the same distance above and below the middle surface. Thus, both the orthotropic material properties, [Qjjlk. of the layers and the angle of the principal material directions to the laminate axes (i.e., the orientation of each layer) must be identical. 

Antisymmetry of a laminate requires (1) symmetry about the middle surface of geometry (i.e., consider a pair of equal-thickness laminae, one some distance above the middle surface and the other the same distance below the middle surface), but (2i some kind of a reversal or mirror image of the material properties [Qjjlk- In fact, the orthotropic material properties [Qjj], are symmetric, but the orientations of the laminae principal material directions are not symmetric about the middle surface. Those orientations are reversed from 0° to 90° (or vice versa) or from + a to - a (a mirror image about the laminate x-axis). Because the [Qjj]k are not symmetric, bending-extension coupling exists. 

Consider an angle-ply laminate composed of orthotropic laminae that are symmetrically arranged about the middle surface as shown in Figure 4-48. Because of the symmetry of both material properties and geometry, there is no coupling between bending and extension. That is, the laminate in Figure 4-48 can be subjected to and will only extend in the x-direction and contract in the y- and z-directions, but will not bend. 

Two simple invariants, U, and U5, were shown in the previous subsubsection to be the basic indicators of average laminate stiffnesses. For isotropic materials, these invariants reduce to U. =Qi. and U5 = Qqq, the extensional stiffness and shear stiffness. Accordingly, Tsai and Pagano suggested the orthotopic invariants U., and U5 be called the isotropic stiffness and isotropic shear rigidity, respectively [7-16 and 7-17]. They observed that these isotropic properties are a realistic measure of the minimum stiffness capability of composite laminates. These isotropic properties can be compared directly to properties of isotropic materials as well as to properties of other orthotropic laminates. Obviously, the comparison criterion is more complex than for isotropic materials because now we have two measures, and U5, instead of the usual isotropic stiffness or E. Comparison of values of U., alone is not fair because of the degrading influence of the usually low values of U5 for composite materials. 

Anisotropic material In an anisotropic material the properties vary, depending on the direction in which they are measured. There are various degrees of anisotropy, using different terms such as orthotropic or unidirectional, bidirectional, heterogeneous, and so on (Fig. 3-19). For example, cast plastics or metals tend to be reasonably isotropic. However, plastics that are extruded, injection molded, and rolled plastics and metals tend to develop an orientation in the processing flow direction (machined direction). Thus, they have different properties in the machine and transverse directions, particularly in the case of extruded or rolled materials (plastics, steels, etc.). 

Isotropic transverse construction Refers to a material that exhibits a special case of or-thotropy in which properties are identical in two orthotropic dimensions but not the third. Having identical properties in both transverse but not in the longitudinal direction. 

Let us first consider the case of an isotropic material, then simplify it for the case of an orthotropic material (same properties in the two directions orthogonal to the fiber axis—in this case, directions 2 and 3), snch as a nnidirectionally reinforced composite lamina. Eqnation (5.128) can be written in terms of the strain and stress components, which are conpled dne to the anisotropy of the material. In order to describe the behavior in a manageable way, it is cnstomary to introdnce a reduced set of nomenclature. Direct stresses and strains have two snbscripts—for example, an, 22, ti2, and Y2i, depending on whether the stresses and strains are tensile (a and s) or shear (t and y) in natnre. The modnli should therefore also have two subscripts En, E22, and G 2, and so on. By convention, engineers nse a contracted form of notation, where possible, so that repeated snbscripts are reduced to just one an becomes a, En becomes En but Gn stays the same. The convention is fnrther extended for stresses and strains, such that distinctions between tensile and shear stresses and strains are... 

If everyone liked the same thing we would have run out of it, whatever it was, long ago. So it is with textile polymers. There are an almost infinite number of end uses, each of which demands a particular combination of fiber/yarn/fabric/composite-construction properties, but one of the most common features of textile polymer products is that they are all orthotropic, i.e., they have elastic properties with considerable variation of strength in two directions perpendicular to one another. This element of elasticity has a profound impact on fiber toughness and also on the time dependent properties of the polymer product. 

However, Van Buskirk and Ashman [1981] used the small differences in elastic properties between the radial and tangential directions to postulate that bone is an orthotropic material this requires that 9 of... 

The polymer sample is assumed to have at least orthotropic symmetry, i.e. it contains three mutually perpendicular directions such that if it is rotated through 180° about any one of these directions its macroscopic properties are unchanged. Axes OZ1Z2A3 are chosen parallel to these three symmetry directions of the sample. The orientation of a particular structural unit can then be specified in terms of three Euler angles, 6, and jr, as shown in fig. 10.7. 

Alternatively, tests can be used to obtain the basic stiffness properties of the material form and their corresponding range measured by some statistical property such as the standard deviation. In two-dimensional cases where there are no significant loads in the out-of-plane direction, the basic orthotropic stiffness properties in Eqn (6.1) can be measured experimentally. Then, the classical laminated plate theory described in previous sections for determination of stiffness can be used effectively to model these sttuctures. Alternatively, the four basic stiffiiesses for 3-D woven composites can be... 

Using the unidirectional stiffness properties of the composite material (HTA/6376) in Table 11.1, the laminates were modelled with one orthotropic solid element per ply in the thickness direction, leading to 16 elements through-thickness for both the splice plate and skin plate. As before, the titanium bolts were modelled with isotropic material properties, with material constants Eb = 110 GPa, Vb = 0.29. Linear 8-node hexa-hedral brick elements with a reduced integration scheme were used for the laminates and bolts. This element formulation was used to reduce the cost of the analysis and size of the output files, which were very large. 

Many combinations of resins and reinforcement types and weaves available for specific structural applications. Directional strength properties can be varied from unidirectional to orthotropic by choice of reinforcement type and laminate fabrication method. 

Elastic constants and strength properties needed for the characterization of directional behavior can be used. The number of constants needed depends primarily on the complexity of the construction, that is, whether it is isotropic, planar isotropic, or orthotropic. With these stiffness constants known, the directional stiffness properties can be calculated using textbook equations. 

Thus far four composites listed in Table I have been studied. NbTi/Cu is discussed briefly here. From its microstructure and manufacture, a rectangular cross-section bar, it was assumed that this composite has orthorhombic (orthotropic) symmetry in its physical properties. Materials with this symmetry have nine independent elastic constants. While deviations from elastic behavior were small, nine independent elastic constants were verified. Four specimens were prepared (Fig. 16) and 18 ultrasonic wave velocities were determined by propagating differently polarized waves in six directions, (100) and (110). An example cooling run is shown in Fig. 17 for E33, Young s modulus along the filament axis. These data typify the composites studies a wavy, irregular modulus/temperature curve. 

---