Direct methanol fuel cell oxygen kinetics

Fig. 13.27. Potential vs. current density plots for state-of-the-art fuel cells, o, proton exchange membrane fuel cell , solid oxide fuel cell , pressurized phosphonic acid fuel cell (PAFC) a, direct methanol fuel cell, direct methanol PAFC , alkaline fuel cell. (Reprinted from M. A. Parthasarathy, S. Srinivasan, and A. J. Appleby, Electrode Kinetics of Oxygen Reduction at Carbon-Supported and Un-supported Platinum Microcrystal-lite/Nafion Interfaces, J. Electroanalytical Chem. 339 101-121, copyright 1992, p. 103, Fig. 1, with permission from Elsevier Science.)...

The construction of a cell permitting both FTIR measurements and electrochemical impedance measurements at buried polymer/metal interfaces has been described [266]. Ingress of water and electrolyte, oxidation (corrosion) of the aluminum metal layer, swelling of the polymer and delamination of the polymer were observed. A cell suitable for ATR measurements up to 80°C has been described [267]. The combination of a cell for ATR measurements with DBMS (see Sect. 5.8.1) has been developed [268]. It permits simultaneous detection of stable adsorbed species and relatively stable adsorbed reaction intermediates (via FTIR spectroscopy), quantitative determination of volatile species with DBMS and elucidation of overall reaction kinetics. An arrangement with a gas-fed electrode attached to the ATR element and operated at T = 60°C has been reported [269]. In this study, the establishment of mixed potentials at an oxygen consuming direct methanol fuel cell in the presence of methanol at the cathode was investigated. With infrared spec-... 

Methanol (MeOH) crossover from the anode to the cathode in the direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) is responsible for significant depolarization of the Pt cathode catalyst. Compared to Pt-based catalysts, NPMCs are poor oxidation catalysts, of methanol oxidation in particular, which makes them highly methanol-tolerant. As shown in Fig. 8.25, the ORR activity of a PANI-Fe-C catalyst in a sulfuric acid solution is virtually independent of the methanol content, up to 5.0 M in MeOH concentration. A significant performance loss is only observed in 17 M MeOH solution ( 1 1 water-to-methanol molar ratio), a solution that can no longer be considered aqueous. The changes to oxygen solubility and diffusivity, as well as to the double-layer dielectric environment, are all likely to impact the ORR mechanism and kinetics, which may not be associated with the electrochemical oxidation of methanol at the catalyst surface. Based on the ORR polarization plots recorded at... 

There is another fuel cell working under the ambient condition, that is, direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). Difference in the PEFCs and DMFCs is their anode fuels (the cathode fuel is oxygen in both cases). In the DMFCs, methanol (CH3OH) is supplied to the anode instead of the hydrogen for the PEFCs and this difference is crucial for their ceU performances. Although the Pt is known to be an active catalyst for both HOR and methanol oxidation reaction (MOR), kinetics of the MOR is much slower than that of the HOR and ORR on the Pt catalyst, which increases anode overpotential and gives an inferior cell performance in the DMFCs as demonstrated in Fig. 1. Therefore, an important research topic is... 

In the case of direct methanol fuel cells, compared with oxygen reduction, methanol oxidation accounts for the main activation loss because this process involves six-electron transfer per methanol molecule and catalyst self-poison when Pt alone was used from the adsorbed intermediate products such as COads-From the thermodynamic point of view, methanol electrooxidation is driven due to the negative Gibbs free energy change in the fuel cell. On the other hand, in the real operation conditions, its rate is obviously limited by the sluggish reaction kinetics. In order to speed up the anode reaction rate, it is necessary to develop an effective electrocatalyst with a high activity to methanol electrooxidation. Carbon-supported (XC-72C, Cabot Corp.) PtRu, PtPd, PtW, and PtSn were prepared by the modified polyol method as already described [58]. Pt content in all the catalysts was 20 wt%. 

Wang, Y., Li, L., Hu, L., Zhuang, L., Lu, J. and Xu, B. A feasibility analysis for alkaline membrane direct methanol fuel cell thermodynamic disadvantages versus kinetic advantages , Electrochem. Commun., 5 (2003) 662-666. Yang, J. and Xu, J.J. Nanoporous amorphous manganese oxide as electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in alkaline solutions , Electrochem, Commun., S (2003) 306-311. 

Considering (Mily the thermodynamics of the DMFC (used here as a representative of direct alcohol fuel cells), methanol should be oxidized spraitaneously when the potential of the anode is above 0.05 V/SHE. Similarly, oxygen should be reduced spontaneously when the cathode potential is below 1.23 V/SHE, identical to a H2-O2 fuel cell. However, kinetic losses due to side reactions cause a deviation of ideal thermodynamic values and decrease the efficiency of the DMFC. This is presented in Fig. lb, which includes various limiting effects as kinetics, ohmic resistance, alcohol crossover, and mass transport. The anode and cathode overpotentials for alcohol oxidation and oxygen reduction reduce the cell potential and together are responsible for the decay in efficiency of approximately 50 % in DMFCs [13, 27]. 

---