Dirac orbital

With the purpose of evaluate not only the energy but also the electron density itself, Ashby and Holzman [15] performed calculations in which the relativistic TF density was replaced at short distancies from the nucleus from the one obtained for the 1 s Dirac orbital for an hydrogenic atom, matched continuously to the semiclassical density at a switching radius rg where the kinetic energy density of both descriptions also match. 

ANGULAR CHARGE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS ( FOR DIRAC ORBITALS 1 1... 

We construct a trial N-electron wave function as an antisymmetric produce of orthonormal one-electron Dirac orbitals u (r) ... 

The notation < i j k 1> introduced above gives the two-electron integrals for the g(r,r ) operator in the so-called Dirac notation, in which the i and k indices label the spin-orbitals that refer to the coordinates r and the j and 1 indices label the spin-orbitals referring to coordinates r. The r and r denote r,0,( ),a and r, 0, ( ), a (with a and a being the a or P spin functions). The fact that r and r are integrated and hence represent dummy variables introduces index permutational symmetry into this list of integrals. For example,... 

The Dirac equation automatically includes effects due to electron spin, while this must be introduced in a more or less ad hoc fashion in the Schrodinger equation (the Pauli principle). Furthermore, once the spin-orbit interaction is included, the total electron spin is no longer a good quantum number, an orbital no longer contains an integer number of a and /) spin functions. The proper quantum number is now the total angular momentum obtained by vector addition of the orbital and spin moments. 

Neglect of relativistic effects, by using the Schrodinger instead of the Dirac equation. This is reasonably justified in tlie upper part of the periodic table, but not in the lower half. For some phenomena, like spin-orbit coupling, there is no classical counterpart, and only a relativistic treatment can provide an understanding. 

In summary, the OP-term introduced by Brooks and coworkers has been transferred to a corresponding potential term in the Dirac equation. As it is demonstrated this approach allows to account for the enhancement of the spin-orbit induced orbital magnetic moments and related phenomena for ordered alloys as well as disordered. systems by a corresponding extension of the SPR-KKR-CPA method. 

The notion of electrons in orbitals consists essentially of ascribing four distinct quantum numbers to each electron in a many-electron atom. It can be shown that this notion is strictly inconsistent with quantum mechanics (7). Definite quantum numbers for individual electrons do not have any meaning in the framework of quantum mechanics. The erroneous view stems from the original formulation of the Pauli principle in 1925, which stated that no two electrons could share the same four quantum numbers (8), This version of the principle was superseded by a new formulation that avoids any reference to individual quantum numbers for separate electrons. The new version due to the independent work of Heisenberg and Dirac in 1926 states that the wave function of a many-electron atom must be antisymmetrical with respect to the interchange of any two particles (9,10). 

The inclusion of (nonrelativistic) property operators, in combination with relativistic approximation schemes, bears some complications known as the picture-change error (PCE) [67,190,191] as it completely neglects the unitary transformation of that property operator from the original Dirac to the Schrodinger picture. Such PCEs are especially large for properties where the inner (core) part of the valence orbital is probed, for example, nuclear electric field gradients (EEG), which are an important... 

However, there also exists a third possibility. By using a famous relation due to Dirac, the relativistic effects can be (in a nonunique way) divided into spin-independent and spin-dependent terms. The former are collectively called scalar relativistic effects and the latter are subsumed under the name spin-orbit coupling (SOC). The scalar relativistic effects can be straightforwardly included in the one-electron Hamiltonian operator h. Unless the investigated elements are very heavy, this recovers the major part of the distortion of the orbitals due to relativity. The SOC terms may be treated in a second step by perturbation theory. This is the preferred way of approaching molecular properties and only breaks down in the presence of very heavy elements or near degeneracy of the investigated electronic state. 

The expressions (4.22)-(4.23) found in chap. 4 for the isomer shift 5 in nonrelativ-istic form may be applied to lighter elements up to iron without causing too much of an error. In heavier elements, however, the wave function j/ is subject to considerable modification by relativistic effects, particularly near the nucleus (remember that the spin-orbit coupling coefficient increases with Z ). Therefore, the electron density at the nucleus l /(o)P will be modified as well and the aforementioned equations for the isomer shift require relativistic correction. This has been considered [1] in a somewhat restricted approach by using Dirac wave functions and first-order perturbation theory in this approximation the relativistic correction simply consists of a dimensionless factor S (Z), which is introduced in the above equations for S,... 

The twin facts that heavy-atom compounds like BaF, T1F, and YbF contain many electrons and that the behavior of these electrons must be treated relati-vistically introduce severe impediments to theoretical treatments, that is, to the inclusion of sufficient electron correlation in this kind of molecule. Due to this computational complexity, calculations of P,T-odd interaction constants have been carried out with relativistic matching of nonrelativistic wavefunctions (approximate relativistic spinors) [42], relativistic effective core potentials (RECP) [43, 34], or at the all-electron Dirac-Fock (DF) level [35, 44]. For example, the first calculation of P,T-odd interactions in T1F was carried out in 1980 by Hinds and Sandars [42] using approximate relativistic wavefunctions generated from nonrelativistic single particle orbitals. 

In non-relativistic Schrodinger theory every component of the orbital angular momentum L = r x p, as well as L2, commutes with the Hamiltonian H = p2/2m + V of a spinless particle in a central field. As a result, simultaneous eigenstates of the operators H, L2 and Lz exist in Schrodinger theory, with respective eigenvalues of E, l(l + l)h2 and mh. In Dirac s theory, however, neither the components of L, nor L2, commute with the Hamiltonian 10. 

Despite the complication due to the interdependence of orbital and spin angular momenta, the Dirac equation for a central field can be separated in spherical polar coordinates [63]. The energy eigenvalues for the hydrogen atom (V(r) = e2/r, in electrostatic units), are equivalent to the relativistic terms of the old quantum theory [64]... 

---