Dipoles, electronic formation

A condition for such a reaction to take place is a certain similarity of the interacting HOMO and LUMO orbitals, depending on the relative orbital energies of both the dipolarophile and the dipole. Electron-withdrawing groups on the dipolarophile normally favour an interaction of the LUMO of the dipolarophile with the HOMO of the dipole that leads to the formation of the new bonds, whereas electron donating groups on the dipolarophile normally... 

The following figure shows that London dispersion forces are attractive forces between instantaneous dipoles that result from the flexing of the negative electron cloud about the positive nuclear framework of an atom or molecule. The short-lived dipoles induce formation of more dipoles in adjacent molecules, which attracts them to one another. After an instant, the whole attractive structure of instantaneous dipoles will form again in a different direction. 

The formation of a temporary dipole in one atom or molecule causes electrons in a neighbouring atom or molecule to be displaced, resulting in the formation of another temporary dipole. This process is termed induction, and the newly formed dipole an induced dipole. The formation of induced dipoles is rapidly transmitted through the liquid or solid. The forces of attraction between temporary or induced dipoles (Figure 4.70) are known as London (dispersion) forces. 

Fig. 2. We demonstrated that the fluorescence becomes polarized upon application of the field [9] this is shown in Fig. 2 as the dependence of the AF spectrum on the experimental angle X Induced fluorescence polarization is expected in an isotropic sample because the rate of electron transfer depends on the orientation of the P I dipole whose formation competes with fluorescence, and consequently the fluorescence quantum yield depends on the orientation of the RC relative to the field. Based on a quantitative analysis of the induced polarization we argued that the P" dipole orientation is consistent with its being not...

Scheme 17.12. Stepwise decompositions of protonated Aspidosperma alkaloid occurring by either (a) stereochemical D ring cleavage yielding loss of acetamide neutral or (b) ion-dipole complex formation by A-benzyl bond cleavage of the protecting group of the indolic system decomposing into odd-electron product ions. (Adapted with permission from Ref 61.)...

Quantum chemical descriptors such as atomic charges, HOMO and LUMO energies, HOMO and LUMO orbital energy differences, atom-atom polarizabilities, super-delocalizabilities, molecular polarizabilities, dipole moments, and energies sucb as the beat of formation, ionization potential, electron affinity, and energy of protonation are applicable in QSAR/QSPR studies. A review is given by Karelson et al. [45]. 

Semiempirical methods are parameterized to reproduce various results. Most often, geometry and energy (usually the heat of formation) are used. Some researchers have extended this by including dipole moments, heats of reaction, and ionization potentials in the parameterization set. A few methods have been parameterized to reproduce a specific property, such as electronic spectra or NMR chemical shifts. Semiempirical calculations can be used to compute properties other than those in the parameterization set. 

Neither bromine nor ethylene is a polar molecule but both are polarizable and an induced dipole/mduced dipole force causes them to be mutually attracted to each other This induced dipole/mduced dipole attraction sets the stage for Br2 to act as an electrophile Electrons flow from the tt system of ethylene to Br2 causing the weak bromine-bromine bond to break By analogy to the customary mechanisms for electrophilic addition we might represent this as the formation of a carbocation m a bimolecular elementary step... 

In addition to total energy and gradient, HyperChem can use quantum mechanical methods to calculate several other properties. The properties include the dipole moment, total electron density, total spin density, electrostatic potential, heats of formation, orbital energy levels, vibrational normal modes and frequencies, infrared spectrum intensities, and ultraviolet-visible spectrum frequencies and intensities. The HyperChem log file includes energy, gradient, and dipole values, while HIN files store atomic charge values. 

Forces of Adsorption. Adsorption may be classified as chemisorption or physical adsorption, depending on the nature of the surface forces. In physical adsorption the forces are relatively weak, involving mainly van der Waals (induced dipole—induced dipole) interactions, supplemented in many cases by electrostatic contributions from field gradient—dipole or —quadmpole interactions. By contrast, in chemisorption there is significant electron transfer, equivalent to the formation of a chemical bond between the sorbate and the soHd surface. Such interactions are both stronger and more specific than the forces of physical adsorption and are obviously limited to monolayer coverage. The differences in the general features of physical and chemisorption systems (Table 1) can be understood on the basis of this difference in the nature of the surface forces. 

A type of molecular resonance scattering can also occur from the formation of short-lived negative ions due to electron capture by molecules on surfrices. While this is frequently observed for molecules in the gas phase, it is not so important for chemisorbed molecules on metal surfaces because of extremely rapid quenching (electron transfer to the substrate) of the negative ion. Observations have been made for this scattering mechanism in several chemisorbed systems and in phys-isorbed layers, with the effects usually observed as smaU deviations of the cross section for inelastic scattering from that predicted from dipole scattering theory. 

Where FCl is the solute gas-liquid partition coefficient, r is the tendency of the solvent to interact through k- and n-electron pairs (Lewis basicity), s the contribution from dipole-dipole and dipole-induced dipole interactions (in molecular solvents), a is the hydrogen bond basicity of the solvent, b is its hydrogen bond acidity and I is how well the solvent will separate members of a homologous series, with contributions from solvent cavity formation and dispersion interactions. 

The Hammond postulate says that any factor stabilizing the intermediate carbocation should increase the rate of an S l reaction. Solvation of the carbocation—the interaction of the ion with solvent molecules—has just such an effect. Solvent molecules orient around the carbocation so that the electron-rich ends of the solvent dipoles face the positive charge (Figure 11.14), thereby lowering the energy of the ion and favoring its formation. 

It is then shown that (excepting the rare-earth ions) the magnetic moment of a non-linear molecule or complex ion is determined by the number of unpaired electrons, being equal to ms = 2 /S(S + 1), in which 5 is half that number. This makes it possible to determine from magnetic data which eigenfunctions are involved in bond formation, and so to decide between electron-pair bonds and ionic or ion-dipole bonds for various complexes. It is found that the transition-group elements almost without exception form electron-pair bonds with CN, ionic bonds with F, and ion-dipole bonds with H2O with other groups the bond type varies. 

The fact of a transfer of an electron from an absorbed particle to adsorbent [25] is widely considered as a criterion to differentiate between various forms of adsorption. Yet, as it has been already mentioned in previous section, there is a neutral form of chemisorption, i.e. weak binding formed without changing the surface charge state which only affects the dipole component of the work function. On the other hand, in several cases the physical adsorption can result in electron transitions in solids. Indeed, apart from formation of a double layer, changing the work function of adsorbent [26] the formation of surface dipoles accompanying physical adsorption can bring free charge carriers to substan-... 

In Chapter 10 of Part A, the mechanistic classification of 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions as concerted cycloadditions was developed. Dipolar cycloaddition reactions are useful both for syntheses of heterocyclic compounds and for carbon-carbon bond formation. Table 6.2 lists some of the types of molecules that are capable of dipolar cycloaddition. These molecules, which are called 1,3-dipoles, have it electron systems that are isoelectronic with allyl or propargyl anions, consisting of two filled and one empty orbital. Each molecule has at least one charge-separated resonance structure with opposite charges in a 1,3-relationship, and it is this structural feature that leads to the name 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions for this class of reactions.136... 

The well-known tetrahedral [Co(NCS)4]2 ion has continued to attract attention from analytical chemists, physical chemists, and spectroscopists. The inelastic electron tunneling (IET) spectrum of (Me4N)2[Co(NCS)4] was compared with IR and Raman spectra of the same complex.359 The vibrational bands due to the Me4N+ were prominent in all three spectra, but Coligand stretches were absent from the IET spectra. The lowest 4 42 4T2 electronic transition was strong in the IET spectrum but absent from the IR spectrum. The electric dipole allowed 4A2 4TX electronic transition was observed in both the IET and IR spectra and no fine structure was observed. Complex formation equilibria between Co11 and SCN- were studied calorimetri-... 

In order to understand the observed shift in oxidation potentials and the stabilization mechanism two possible explanations were forwarded by Kotz and Stucki [83], Either a direct electronic interaction of the two oxide components via formation of a common 4-band, involving possible charge transfer, gives rise to an electrode with new homogeneous properties or an indirect interaction between Ru and Ir sites and the electrolyte phase via surface dipoles creates improved surface properties. These two models will certainly be difficult to distinguish. As is demonstrated in Fig. 25, XPS valence band spectroscopy could give some evidence for the formation of a common 4-band in the mixed oxides prepared by reactive sputtering [83],... 

If the transition dipoles are aligned in a head-to-tail formation, then a red shift is expected. This is the reported explanation for the sharp bands at 573 and 578 (J bands). The narrow half-bandwidths of the split J aggregate absorption suggest that the exciton states are not strongly coupled with external perturbations. The two distinct electronic transitions were proposed to arise from two structural modifications of the aggregates. 

---