Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusive ultrafiltration

Surface active electrolytes produce charged micelles whose effective charge can be measured by electrophoretic mobility [117,156]. The net charge is lower than the degree of aggregation, however, since some of the counterions remain associated with the micelle, presumably as part of a Stem layer (see Section V-3) [157]. Combination of self-diffusion with electrophoretic mobility measurements indicates that a typical micelle of a univalent surfactant contains about 1(X) monomer units and carries a net charge of 50-70. Additional colloidal characterization techniques are applicable to micelles such as ultrafiltration [158]. [Pg.481]

A key factor determining the performance of ultrafiltration membranes is concentration polarization due to macromolecules retained at the membrane surface. In ultrafiltration, both solvent and macromolecules are carried to the membrane surface by the solution permeating the membrane. Because only the solvent and small solutes permeate the membrane, macromolecular solutes accumulate at the membrane surface. The rate at which the rejected macromolecules can diffuse away from the membrane surface into the bulk solution is relatively low. This means that the concentration of macromolecules at the surface can increase to the point that a gel layer of rejected macromolecules forms on the membrane surface, becoming a secondary barrier to flow through the membrane. In most ultrafiltration appHcations this secondary barrier is the principal resistance to flow through the membrane and dominates the membrane performance. [Pg.78]

Ultrafiltration separations range from ca 1 to 100 nm. Above ca 50 nm, the process is often known as microfiltration. Transport through ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes is described by pore-flow models. Below ca 2 nm, interactions between the membrane material and the solute and solvent become significant. That process, called reverse osmosis or hyperfiltration, is best described by solution—diffusion mechanisms. [Pg.293]

The statistical properties of polymer chains in a quenched random medium have been the subject of intensive investigations during the last decades, both theoretically [79-89] and experimentally [90-96], because diffusion in such media is of great relevance for chromatography, membrane separation, ultrafiltration, etc. [Pg.600]

Early ultrafiltration membranes had thin surface retentive layers with an open structure underneath, as shown in Fig. 20-62. These membranes were prone to defects and showed poor retention and consistency. In part, retention by these membranes would rely on large retained components in the feed that polarize or form a cake layer that plugs defects. Composite membranes have a thin retentive layer cast on top of a microfiltration membrane in one piece. These composites demonstrate consistently high retention and can be integrity-tested by using air diffusion in water. [Pg.51]

On-line dialysis also separates the analyte from tissue matrix based upon molecular size, but in this case, the sample extract is passed over a membrane filter through which the analyte (and other low molecular weight compounds) is diffused into a second solvent on the other side of the membrane filter. Usually, the second solvent is then concentrated on to an SPE column to minimize the dilution effect that is caused by the dialysis process. Agasoester used on-line dialysis to separate oxytetracycline from muscle, liver, milk, and egg tissue matrix components. A problem encountered with on-line dialysis is the inability of analyte molecules that are bound to proteins in the sample extract to pass through the membrane filter. Problems with membrane clogging are reduced with on-line dialysis compared with ultrafiltration because no external force is being applied to bring the analyte across the membrane filter. [Pg.310]

Dialysis involves the removal of metabolic waste products by diffusion and ultrafiltration from the bloodstream across a semipermeable membrane into an external dialysate solution. [Pg.373]

The thermodynamic approach does not make explicit the effects of concentration at the membrane. A good deal of the analysis of concentration polarisation given for ultrafiltration also applies to reverse osmosis. The control of the boundary layer is just as important. The main effects of concentration polarisation in this case are, however, a reduced value of solvent permeation rate as a result of an increased osmotic pressure at the membrane surface given in equation 8.37, and a decrease in solute rejection given in equation 8.38. In many applications it is usual to pretreat feeds in order to remove colloidal material before reverse osmosis. The components which must then be retained by reverse osmosis have higher diffusion coefficients than those encountered in ultrafiltration. Hence, the polarisation modulus given in equation 8.14 is lower, and the concentration of solutes at the membrane seldom results in the formation of a gel. For the case of turbulent flow the Dittus-Boelter correlation may be used, as was the case for ultrafiltration giving a polarisation modulus of ... [Pg.455]

Bowen, W. R. and Williams, P. M. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 (2001) 3083. Prediction of the rate of cross-flow ultrafiltration of colloids with concentration-dependent diffusion coefficient and viscosity-theory and experiment. [Pg.473]

Mitrovic and Knezic (1979) also prepared ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membranes by this technique. Their membranes were etched in 5% oxalic acid. The membranes had pores of the order of 100 nm, but only about 1.5 nm in the residual barrier layer (layer AB in Figure 2.15). The pores in the barrier layer were unstable in water and the permeability decreased during the experiments. Complete dehydration of alumina or phase transformation to a-alumina was necessary to stabilize the pore structure. The resulting membranes were found unsuitable for reverse osmosis but suitable for ultrafiltration after removing the barrier layer. Beside reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration measurements, some gas permeability data have also been reported on this type of membranes (Itaya et al. 1984). The water flux through a 50/im thick membrane is about 0.2mL/cm -h with a N2 flow about 6cmVcm -min-bar. The gas transport through the membrane was due to Knudsen diffusion mechanism, which is inversely proportional to the square root of molecular mass. [Pg.48]

With anodic oxidation very controlled and narrow pore size distributions can be obtained. These membranes mounted in a small module may be suitable for ultrafiltration, gas separation with Knudsen diffusion and in biological applications. At present one of the main disadvantages is that the layer has to be supported by a separate layer to produce the complete membrane/support structure. Thus, presently applications are limited to laboratory-scale separations since large surface area modules of such membranes are unavailable. [Pg.49]

For a detailed description of the separation processes that may take place at the sensing microzone, the foundation of which is closely related to non-chromatographic continuous separation techniques based on mass transfer across a gas-liquid (gas diffusion), liquid-liquid (dialysis, ultrafiltration) or liquid-solid interface (sorption), interested readers are referred to specialized monographs e.g. [3]). [Pg.261]

One of the most common sources of contamination is the electrolyte since impurities in it would diffuse to the electrode and adhere to it during the course of the experiment. Impurities in the electrolyte can be reduced substantially by careful purification of solvent and solute. Distillation or ultrafiltration purifies water, the most common solvent. Usually solute materials can be bought in a very high purity, and whenever this is not the case, they can be cleaned by standard procedures such as recrystallization or calcination. Electrolysis of the electrolyte is also a common practice. Here, two sacrificial electrodes are immersed in the electrolyte and a potential is applied between them for about 36 hr in such a way that impurities are oxidized or reduced on their surfaces—the electrodes act as a garbage disposal thus the name of sacrificial electrodes. [Pg.67]


See other pages where Diffusive ultrafiltration is mentioned: [Pg.421]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.2031]    [Pg.2036]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.989]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.911]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.296]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.421 ]




SEARCH



Ultrafiltrate

© 2024 chempedia.info