Diffusion phenol hydrogenation

The above kinetics is valid for small particles when the process rate is controlled by the chemical reaction at the surface. Diffusion effects should be accounted for large-size particles. Table 5.8 presents the calculation of the effectiveness factor [24] for spherical particles of 6 mm diameter and a mixture 1 3 phenol/hydrogen at 2 bar and 423 K. Other data are BET internal surface S = 40m2/g, mean pore radius 150 A, catalyst density pp = 1000kg/m3, particle void fraction = 0.3,... 

Reiser expanded the diffusion model for dissolution of novolac 13-24) using percolation theory (25, 2d) as a theoretical framework. Percolation theory describes the macroscopic event, the dissolution of resist into the developer, without necessarily understanding the microscopic interactions that dictate the resist behavior. Reiser views the resist as an amphiphilic material a hydrophobic solid in which is embedded a finite number of hydrophilic active sites (the phenolic hydrogens). When applied to a thin film of resist, developer diffuses into the film by moving from active site to active site. When the hydroxide ion approaches an active site, it deprotonates the phenol generating an ionic form of the polymer. In Reiser s model, the rate of dissolution of the resin. .. is predicated on the deprotonation process [and] is controlled by the diffusion of developer into the polymer matrix (27). 

Phenols (p-cresol, guaiacol, pyrogallol, catechol) and aromatic amines (aniline, p-tolidine, o-phenyldiamine, o-dianisidine) are typical substrates for peroxidases [90 -109]. These compounds are oxidized by hydrogen peroxide or hydroperoxides under peroxidase catalysis to generate radicals, which after diffusion from the active center of the enzyme react with further aromatic substrates to form dimeric, oligomeric or polymeric products. 

If radicals diffuse from the solvent cage, fragmentation products are formed. Abstraction of hydrogen from the solvent by a phenoxy radical results in phenol, which can almost always be observed among the photoproducts of aryl esters in solution. Chemical evidence for the reaction of phenoxy radical with solvent is the formation of nearly stoichiometric amounts of 4-methyI-phenol and acetone from the irradiation of 4-methylphenyl benzoate (60) in isopropyl alcohol.34... 

It has been mentioned that phenol is formed via Path A, by diffusion of radicals from the solvent cage and hydrogen abstraction from the solvent. This process is undoubtedly favored (and the yield of phenol is increased) when the phenoxy radical 65 already loses its counterpart in the solvent cage, i.e., when it loses the acyl radical 68 as a consequence of its decarbonylation. From the hitherto reported results it can be assumed that decarbonylation is significant and proceeds very readily under two conditions. It occurs (1) if the acyl radical formed possesses excess energy ( hot radical) due to excitation of high energy, e.g., by y-radiolysis,41,46 and (2) if the alkyl or aryl radicals formed by the decarbonylation of the acyl radical are exceptionally stable.61... 

Phenols. Presumably they arise exclusively via dissociative Path A, subsequent radical diffusion from the solvent cage, and abstraction of a hydrogen from the solvent (65 -> 74). The yields are (1) increased with decreasing viscosity of the reaction medium (2) higher in nonpolar and lower in polar solvents (3) practically independent of the hydrogen-donating ability of the solvent and (4) increased if a radical counterpart of a phenoxy radical, i.e., an acyl radical, decarbonylates in the solvent cage for structural reasons. 

The mechanism shown in Scheme 4.9 has been proposed for the hydrogen atom transfer from phenols (ArOH) to radicals (Y ) in non-aqueous solvents, a kinetic effect ofthe solvent (S) being expected when ArOH is a hydrogen bond donor and the solvent a hydrogen bond acceptor. Steps with mechanistic rate constants k, k-1 and k>, involve proton transfer (the latter two near to the diffusion-controlled limit), and kj involves electron transfer. The step with rate constant fco involves a direct hydrogen atom transfer, and the other path around the cycle involves a stepwise alternative. 

With the establishment of the primary phototriplet reduction mechanism we now turn to the explanation for the effect of flow rates and the formation of polarized phenoxy radicals. Since reaction [2] is a relatively fast secondary process it is readily understood that the observation of the primary ketyl radicals will be dependent upon flow rate. The triplet polarization (E) of the secondary phenacyl radical should not have been affected but the increased contribution of the E/A Radical-Pair polarization altered the overall appearance of the polarization pattern. The diffusion model of the Radical-Pair theory relates the E/A polarization magnitude to the radical concentration within the reaction zone. Since the phenacyl radical is considered to be very chemically reactive, and the product phenol "accumulated" within the reaction zone is also a much better hydrogen donor, the following reactions will proceed within the reaction zone ... 

The relative strength of hydrogen bonding interactions may be evaluated by diffusion measurements141. This method allows the determination of the number of molecules of solvent associated with solutes. Phenols, in ethanol, are associated with 2.5 ethanol molecules, while anilines are associated with 1.1 molecules of ethanol. 

In principle, phenoxyl radicals can react with other molecules also by a hydrogen-abstraction mechanism. The net result of such reactions may be equivalent to that of the electron transfer processes discussed above. It is likely that in aqueous solutions such reactions are much slower than the electron transfer reactions, as indicated by the fact that most reactions between phenoxyl radicals and other phenols are much slower with the neutral phenols than with the phenolate ions. It is possible that even reactions with neutral phenols in aqueous solutions involve an electron transfer mechanism. On the other hand, reactions in organic solvents may well take place by hydrogen abstraction, as discussed before . These reactions take place with much lower rate constants than the electron transfer reactions the most rapid hydrogen abstraction by a phenoxyl radical is probably five orders of magnitude slower than the diffusion-controlled limit and most of them are orders of magnitude slower than that. 

Catalytic supercritical water oxidation is an important class of solid-catalyzed reaction that utilizes advantageous solution properties of supercritical water (dielectric constant, electrolytic conductance, dissociation constant, hydrogen bonding) as well as the superior transport properties of the supercritical medium (viscosity, heat capacity, diffusion coefficient, and density). The most commonly encountered oxidation reaction carried out in supercritical water is the oxidation of alcohols, acetic acid, ammonia, benzene, benzoic acid, butanol, chlorophenol, dichlorobenzene, phenol, 2-propanol (catalyzed by metal oxide catalysts such as CuO/ZnO, Ti02, MnOz, KMn04, V2O5, and Cr203), 2,4-dichlorophenol, methyl ethyl ketone, and pyridine (catalyzed by supported noble metal catalysts such as supported platinum). ... 

---