Diffusion diffusional cases

The work of T.J. Davies et al. [. Solid State Electrochem. 9 (2005) 797] identified four diffusional cases which arise at micro electrode arrays. As time passes and diffusion layers grow, the behaviour changes from one to the next. The cases are ... 

The different possible diffusional cases are summarised in Fig. 9.17 and are discussed in Chapters 6 and 11 in more detail. In Case 4 there is effectively linear diffusion to the entire geometric area covered by the nanoparticles, and so the peak-shaped voltammetry reflects the area of the imderlying electrode... 

Many nanoparticle arrays exhibit diffusional Case 4 behaviour because the nanoparticles are deposited in sufficient density on the substrate that their diffusion layers overlap extensively. If the nanoparticles are being exploited for their catalytic properties, this is highly economical by comparison to the use of a macroelectrode of a catalytic metal, since only a very small quantity of the catalyst is required to achieve an equivalent current. 

The importance of internal diffusion can also be appreciated from a different point of view the fact that the internal diffusion plays a pivotal role in internal and external transport processes. For negligible concentration gradient in the pellet, Eq. 4.57 still holds. However, the value of r Da will be larger than that for diffusion-limited case for the same intrinsic rate since 17 is larger and therefore the pellet will be more isothermal as Figure 4.7 reveals. Further, a relativdy large Biot number for mass under realistic conditions still ensures negligible external mass transfer resistance. It is seen then that in the absence of diffusional resistance, the pellet tends to be more isothermal and the only major resistance is likely to be external heat transfer. 

We note that when greater than diffusional resistance), the system reduces to the chemical-reaction-controlled case and when is large, to the diffusion-controlled case. 

The Langmuir-Hinshelwood picture is essentially that of Fig. XVIII-14. If the process is unimolecular, the species meanders around on the surface until it receives the activation energy to go over to product(s), which then desorb. If the process is bimolecular, two species diffuse around until a reactive encounter occurs. The reaction will be diffusion controlled if it occurs on every encounter (see Ref. 211) the theory of surface diffusional encounters has been treated (see Ref. 212) the subject may also be approached by means of Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics techniques [213]. In the case of activated bimolecular reactions, however, there will in general be many encounters before the reactive one, and the rate law for the surface reaction is generally written by analogy to the mass action law for solutions. That is, for a bimolecular process, the rate is taken to be proportional to the product of the two surface concentrations. It is interesting, however, that essentially the same rate law is obtained if the adsorption is strictly localized and species react only if they happen to adsorb on adjacent sites (note Ref. 214). (The apparent rate law, that is, the rate law in terms of gas pressures, depends on the form of the adsorption isotherm, as discussed in the next section.)... 

The diffusional transport model for systems in which sorbed molecules can be divided in two populations, one formed by completely immobilized molecules and the other by molecules free to diffuse, has been developed by Vieth and Sladek 33) in a modified form of the Fick s second law. However, if linear isotherms are experimentally found, as in the case of the DGEBA-TETA system in Fig. 4, the diffusion of the penetrant may be described by the classical diffusion law with constant value of the effective diffusion coefficient,... 

It must be pointed out that in a diffusion layer where the ions are transported not only by migration but also by diffusion, the effective transport numbers t of the ions (the ratios between partial currents ij and total current t) will differ from the parameter tj [defined by Eq. (1.13)], which is the transport number of ion j in the bulk electrolyte, where concentration gradients and diffusional transport of substances are absent. In fact, in our case the effective transport number of the reacting ions in the diffusion layer is unity and that of the nonreacting ions is zero. 

Influence of the Diffusional Potential Drop In the case being considered, a potential difference % is established across the diffusion layer whose value can be found by integrating Eq. (4.20) from x = 0 to x = 5 ... 

The percutaneous absorption picture can be qualitatively clarified by considering Fig. 3, where the schematic skin cross section is placed side by side with a simple model for percutaneous absorption patterned after an electrical circuit. In the case of absorption across a membrane, the current or flux is in terms of matter or molecules rather than electrons, and the driving force is a concentration gradient (technically, a chemical potential gradient) rather than a voltage drop [38]. Each layer of a membrane acts as a diffusional resistor. The resistance of a layer is proportional to its thickness (h), inversely proportional to the diffusive mobility of a substance within it as reflected in a... 

When (DEB), is much smaller than unity, the polymer relaxation is relatively rapid compared to diffusion. In this case, conformational changes take place instantaneously and equilibrium is attained after each diffusional jump. This is the type of diffusion encountered ordinarily and is called viscous diffusion. Therefore, the transport will obey classical theories of diffusion. When (DEB), is much larger than unity, the molecular relaxation is very slow compared to diffusion and there are no conformational changes of the medium within the diffusion time scale. In this case, Fick s law is generally valid, but no concentration dependence of the diffusion coefficient is expected. This is termed elastic diffusion. When (DEB), is in the neighborhood of unity, molecular rearrangment... 

The numerator of the right side of this equation is equal to the chemical reaction rate that would prevail if there were no diffusional limitations on the reaction rate. In this situation, the reactant concentration is uniform throughout the pore and equal to its value at the pore mouth. The denominator may be regarded as the product of a hypothetical diffusive flux and a cross-sectional area for flow. The hypothetical flux corresponds to the case where there is a linear concentration gradient over the pore length equal to C0/L. The Thiele modulus is thus characteristic of the ratio of an intrinsic reaction rate in the absence of mass transfer limitations to the rate of diffusion into the pore under specified conditions. 

This equation gives the differential yield of V for a porous catalyst at a point in a reactor. For equal combined diffusivities and the case where hT approaches zero (no diffusional limitations on the reaction rate), this equation reduces to equation 9.3.8, since the ratio of the hyperbolic tangent terms becomes y/k2 A/ki v As hT increases from about 0.3 to about 2.0, the selectivity of the catalyst falls off continuously. The selectivity remains essentially constant when both hyperbolic tangent terms approach unity. This situation corresponds td low effectiveness factors and, in tliis case, equation 12.3.149 becomes... 

In the general case, when arbitrary interaction profiles prevail, the particle deposition rate must be obtained by solving the complete transport equations. The first numerical solution of the complete convective diffusional transport equations, including London-van der Waals attraction, gravity, Brownian diffusion and the complete hydrodynamical interactions, was obtained for a spherical collector [89]. Soon after, numerical solutions were obtained for a panoplea of other collector geometries... 

FIGURE 19.12 Considerations for the interpretation of SSITKA data. Case 1 Three formates can exist, including (a) rapid reaction zone (RRZ)—those reacting rapidly at the metal-oxide interface (b) intermediate surface diffusion zone (SDZ)—those at path lengths sufficient to eventually diffuse to the metal and contribute to overall activity, and (c) stranded intermediate zone (SIZ)—intermediates are essentially locked onto surface due to excessive diffusional path lengths to the metal-oxide interface. Case 2 Metal particle population sufficient to overcome excessive surface diffusional restrictions. Case 3 All rapid reaction zone. Case 4 For Pt/zirconia, unlike Pt/ceria, the activated oxide is confined to the vicinity of the metal particle, and the surface diffusional zones are sensitive to metal loading. 

The rate is independent of particle size. This is an indication of neghgible pore-diffusion resistance, as might be expected for either very porous particles or sufficiently small particles such that the diffusional path-length is very small. In either case, i -> 1, and ( rA)obs = ( rA)inl for the surface reaction. 

In the particular case dealt with now (fully labile complexation), due to the linearity of a combined diffusion equation for DmCm + DmlL ml, the flux in equation (65) can still be seen as the sum of the independent diffusional fluxes of metal and complex, each contribution depending on the difference between the surface and bulk concentration value of each species. But equation (66) warns against using just a rescaling factor for the total metal or for the free metal alone. In general, if the diffusion is coupled with some nonlinear process, the resulting flux is not proportional to bulk-to-surface differences, and this complicates the use of mass transfer coefficients (see ref. [II] or Chapter 3 in this volume). 

---