Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Difference point reactive systems

Retracing the argument used to justify point (2), it is clear that, in a multiply connected space, a given path is only coupled to those paths into which it can be continuously deformed. By definition, these are all the paths that belong to the same homotopy class. Paths belonging to different homotopy classes are thus decoupled from one another [41 5]. For a reactive system with a Cl that has the space of Fig. 1, this means that a path with a given winding number n is coupled to all paths with the same n, but is decoupled from paths with different n. As a result, the Kernel separates into [41-45]... [Pg.11]

The relationships between the components of the Hantzsch triangle were considered in-depth in the monograph 2 and references therein. Although the problem of reactivity of ambident substrates has been studied over many years and from different points of view, the complexity of the starting system and its numerous reaction pathways do not allow one to reliably predict the results of O-alkylation in each particular case, because it is necessary to take into account the rates of numerous reversible and irreversible processes as well as the thermodynamic factors responsible for the position of the equilibrium it is necessary to take solvent effects into consideration when estimating the thermodynamic factors. All accumulated observations are approximated by several empirical mles included in monographs 2 and 3. [Pg.438]

Inspection of Fig. 14.17 reveals that at the nickel electrode, all compounds react at about the same rate, although they exhibit very different and Z)R.X values. Recall that 0.059 V or 5.7 kJ. mol 1 (2.3 RT) difference means one order of magnitude difference in reactivity if the slope of the corresponding LFER (see Eqs. 14-33 to 14-38) is 1.0. Similarly, a rather narrow range in reactivity is found for the reaction with Fe(0), which is reflected in the very small slopes of +0.17 and -0.20 of the lines fitted to the points (Figs. 14.17a and 6). Hence, in these two systems, the actual... [Pg.597]

The importance of the thermodynamic correlation for competing reactions has already been discussed from theoretical and experimental points of view as described in the Introduction. The difference in reactivity created by difference in the redox potential of X2/X systems is clearly reflected in the results obtained in the present study in that the concentration required to stabilize the electrode is different among the kind of halide ions ( lowest for iodide but highest for chloride ions). [Pg.142]

Since the physical state of reactive systems is different before gelation and after the gel point, different experimental methods are used — viscosimetry and dynamic mechanical spectroscopy, respectively. Here, a question arises on the generality of the processes proceeding at different stages of curing and on the comparability of results obtained by these two methods. [Pg.251]

In this section we report our experimental findings relatively to three different reactions of CN radicals with simple alkynes, namely acetylene, methyl-acetylene and dimethyl-acetylene. We have selected these reactive systems for different reasons the reactions with C2H2 is the prototype for the class of reactions CN +- alkynes/polyynes, thus is expected to reveal key concepts for reactions with the higher members of the same series the reactions with methylacetylene and dimethylacetylene were selected to observe the effect of the H substitution with one or two alkyl groups. In all cases, the experimental results are discussed in the light of the ab initio electronic structure calculations for the stationary points of the relevant potential energy surfaces. [Pg.298]

This perturbation theory of chemical reactivity is based upon an early stage of the reactant mutual approach, when the molecules are still distinct though close enough for the MO description of the combined reactive system to be valid, say separated by a distance of the order of 5-10 a.u. The implicit assumption is that the reaction profiles for the compared reaction paths are of similar shape, so that the trend of the predicted energy differences at an early point on the reaction coordinate is expected to reflect the difference in the activation energy. [Pg.125]

Markovic et al. [17] review the data on platinum particles and suggest that the data in dilute sulfuric acid is consistent with Kinoshita s model and further suggest that essentially all of the reactivity can be attributed to the (100) surface. They go on to suggest that this difference in reactivity between the crystal faces is due to structure sensitivity of anion adsorption that impedes the reaction. They point out that in PEM systems, where anion adsorption by the sulfonic acid groups is unlikely, there might be considerably less of a particle-size effect. Still, most PEM catalyst layers employ platinum particles on the order of 3nm, roughly the same size as the maximum in mass activity identified by Kinoshita. [Pg.24]

Lee J.W., Hauan S., Lien K. and Westerberg A. (2000a). Difference points in extractive and reactive cascades. II. Generating design alternatives by the lever rule for reactive systems. Chemical Engineering Science 55, 3161-3174. 3.2.9... [Pg.238]

The optimum moderation condition for uranium oxide pellets in water was determined for three different lump density systems. Optimum moderation for this study was defined as that combination of pellet diameter (POD) and water-to-fuel ratio (W/F) resulting in the maximum material buckling (Bm ), and hence the minimum critical dimensions. This point does not result in optimum reactivity, which is defined as the condition producing the greatest infinite multiplication (k, ). The data to determine these optimum moderation conditions were generated using the computer codes GAMTEC (Ref. 1) and THERMOS (Ref. 2). The results of these determinations are shown in Table I. [Pg.728]


See other pages where Difference point reactive systems is mentioned: [Pg.81]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.2576]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.855]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.2556]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.968]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.260]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.277 , Pg.280 , Pg.281 , Pg.285 ]




SEARCH



Difference point

Difference point equation reactive systems

Reactive system

Reactivity, differing

System difference

© 2024 chempedia.info