Determination of the surface energy

Determining surface energy parameters such as the surface tension, the surface stress, the internal surface energy, etc., is a difficult task. This is partially due to the fact that different 

If we split diamond at the (111) face, then 1.83 x 1019 bonds per m2, break. Thus  

This simple calculation demonstrates that the surface energies of solids can be much higher 

Examples of the surface energies for noble gas crystals at 0 K are given in Table 8.2. The fact that a range of values is given is due to different crystal planes which leads to a variation of the surface energies ua. 

A similar calculation can be done for ionic crystals. In this case the Coulomb interaction is taken into account, in addition to the van der Waals attraction and the Pauli repulsion. Although the van der Waals attraction contributes little to the three-dimensional lattice energy, its contribution to the surface energy is significant and typically 20-30%. The calculated surface energy depends sensitively on the particular choice of the inter-atomic potential. 

---

Measurement of the contact angle at a solid-liquid interface is a widely used method for the determination of the surface energy of solid polymers. Fowkes [1] first proposed that the surface energy of a pure phase, y y could be represented by the sum of the contribution from different types of force components, especially the dispersion and the polar components, such that ... 

When an adsorbing surface is exposed to a gas or vapour adsorption will take place, being accompanied by the absorption or evolution of heat. Such thermal changes have already been noted in the extension and contraction of surface films of liquids. Although the direct determination of the surface energy of solid surfaces presents many experimental difficulties yet of its existence there is no doubt. On the adsorption of a gas or vapour a diminution in the free surface energy of the system likewise occurs. From the Gibbs-Helmholtz relationship dcr... 

Previous investigations of these hydration reactions at room temperature have been reviewed recently (4). Research in this laboratory has included the stoichiometry of the hydration of both silicates, employing different methods of hydration (2, 3, 5, 21), and a determination of the surface energy of tobermorite, the calcium silicate hydrate produced in the hydration of both silicates under most experimental conditions (8). The surface area and the surface energy of tobermorite are briefly discussed by Brunauer (I). These properties play vital roles in determining the strength, dimensional stability, and other important engineering properties of hardened portland cement paste, concrete, and mortar. 

The central problem of the atomic theory of metal surfaces is the proper determination of the surface energy of ideally flat and atomically smooth faces of a simple metal crystal. The methods of quantum mechanics permit the computation of energies with much less effort than is needed for a description in terms of correct wave functions and, of course, the construction of a successful theory of surface energy must touch on most other aspects of the atomic nature of surfaces, such as the potential in the surface region and its associated double layer, or the atomic arrangement and the change in electronic configuration in the surface. 

Inverse gas chromatography (IGC) is used for the determination of the surface energy characteristics of silicas before and after modification by heat treatment or by grafting onto their surface alkyl, polyethylene glycol) and alcohol chains. Because of its high sensitivity, IGC reveals the nature of the grafted molecules, which may then be confirmed by independent methods. 

M. McLean, Determination of the surface energy of copper as a function of crystallographic orientation and temperature, Acta MetalL, 19 (1971), 387-393. 

Koga N and Morokuma K 1985 Determination of the lowest energy point on the crossing seam between two potential surfaces using the energy gradient Chem. Phys. Lett. 119 371... 

The simplest diffraction measurement is the determination of the surface or overlayer unit mesh size and shape. This can be performed by inspection of the diffraction pattern at any energy of the incident beam (see Figure 4). The determination is simplest if the electron beam is incident normal to the surface, because the symmetry of the pattern is then preserved. The diffraction pattern determines only the size and shape of the unit mesh. The positions of atoms in the surface cannot be determined from visual inspection of the diffraction pattern, but must be obtained from an analysis of the intensities of the diffracted beams. Generally, the intensity in a diffracted beam is measured as a fimction of the incident-beam energy at several diffraction geometries. These intensity-versus-energy curves are then compared to model calculations. ... 

The shape of a droplet or of the front end of a film can be determined from the surface energies and interaction forces between the interfaces. These also determine the equilibrium thickness of a liquid film that completely wets a surface. The calculation is done by minimization of the free energy of the total system. In a two-dimensional case the free energy of a cylindrical droplet can be expressed as [5] ... 

In order to determine the equilibrium height of the surface energy barrier 50 caused by occupation of BSS let us make use of the Fermi-Dirak distribution in approximation of the absolute zero of temperatures which is valid as it was shown in [127] for weakly changing densities of SS. For the sake of clarity let us assume that an empty zone of SS corresponds to neutral state of the surface, whereas BSS correspond to acceptor type. 

In order to understand the thermodynamic issues associated with the nanocomposite formation, Vaia et al. have applied the mean-field statistical lattice model and found that conclusions based on the mean field theory agreed nicely with the experimental results [12,13]. The entropy loss associated with confinement of a polymer melt is not prohibited to nanocomposite formation because an entropy gain associated with the layer separation balances the entropy loss of polymer intercalation, resulting in a net entropy change near to zero. Thus, from the theoretical model, the outcome of nanocomposite formation via polymer melt intercalation depends on energetic factors, which may be determined from the surface energies of the polymer and OMLF. 

Experimentally jB is found to be finite. The slope of the relative adsorption versus composition, which is also finite, is referred to as Henry s law for surfaces. For electronegative elements on metallic surfaces the surface activity becomes very high, often of the order of 103. This means that very small amounts of these elements have a large effect on the surface energy, and that the experimental determination of reliable surface energies needs systems of extreme purity. 

A pronounced structural sensitivity of the oxidation of Pt surfaces is also seen in Fig. 1. The reaction takes place at the most positive potential on Pt(lll). This is probably due to effective blocking of the surface by oxy-anions with the trigonal symmetry, compatible with the (111) orientation. A detailed analysis of this reaction on Au(lll) has been recently performed by Angerstein-Kozlowska et al. (14). No such blocking is possible for the Pt(100) and Pt(110) surfaces with four-fold and two-fold symmetries. Consequently, the oxidation commences at more negative potentials, probably predominantly determined by the surface energy as found with Au (16). 

A very accurate measurement of Ccrjt would allow back-calculation of the surface energy for a given crystal. Because Ccrjt is dependent on the square of Y, such a measurement could be a very sensitive method of measuring interfacial energy at dislocation outcrops. The calculated interfacial energy from our experiments is 280+ 90 mJm- for the rhombohedral face of quartz at 300°C. Parks (10) estimated 25°C value of 360 + 30 mJm is well within the experimental error of our measurement. The best way to determine the value of Ccrjt would be to measure etch pit nucleation rate on... 

In order to determine the efficiency of the surface production process, tests were carried out with sodium chloride and it was found that 90 J was required to produce 1 m2 of new surface. As the theoretical value of the surface energy of sodium chloride is only 0.08 J/m2, the efficiency of the process is about 0.1 per cent. Zeleny and Piret(18) have reported calorimetric studies on the crushing of glass and quartz. It was found that a fairly constant energy was required of 77 J/m2 of new surface created, compared with a surface-energy value of less than 5 J/m2. In some cases over 50 per cent of the energy supplied was used to produce plastic deformation of the steel crusher surfaces. 

The determination of the Gibbs energy of adsorption at zero surface coverage AGg=o nd of the interaction parameter A as a function of an electrical variable, may become a valuable source of information on the interactions at the interface. The value of AG°can be considered as the energy required to replace n monomolecularly adsorbed solvent molecules from a fully solvent-covered electrode surface by one monomeric molecule of the solute... 

Berry, J.P. (1963). Determination of fracture surface energies by the cleavage technique. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 62. 

Following the original measurements of the surface energy of sodium chloride by heats of solution by Lipsett et al. 18), much more accurate determinations have been carried out recently by Benson and his co-workers 19-22). Other substances which have been investigated include magnesium oxide 23), calcium oxide and hydroxide 24), and silica, unhydrated and hydrated 25). 

---