Desorption polymer chains

The described bioaffinity separations demonstrate that polyacrylamide spacers aid the selective binding of highly complex and delicate biomacromolecules and their associates. Moreover, these solutes remain biologically active after desorption probably due to the high inertness and flexibility of the surrounding polymer chains fixed on the solid support. The unbound parts of serum usually show no loss of the activities of their constituents. Thus we evaluate the surface of inorganic supports coated with chemisorbed iV-hydroxyethyl polyacrylamide and its derivatives as being biocompatible. 

AT is intended to include any and all of the effects of the sorption rate of monomer on the surface, steric arrangement of active species, the addition of the monomer to the live polymer chain, and any desorption needed to permit the chain to continue growing. We assume a steady state in which every mole of propylene that polymerizes is replaced by another mole entering the shell from the gas, so that all of the fluxes are equal to Ny gmol propylene reacted per second per liter of total reactor volume. The following set of equations relates the molar flux to each of the concentration driving forces. 

Usually, reactions 1 and 2 take place in the aqueous jiiase, yttiile all the other kinetic events can occur both in the aqueous and in the polymer phases. Note that Pj,n indicates the concentration of active polymer chains with nTronaner units and tenninal unit of type j (i. e. of monomer j) Hi is the concentration of monomer i and T is the concentration of the chain transfer agent. Reactions 4 and 5 are responsible for chain desorption from the polymer pjarticles reactions 6 and 7 describe bimolecular temination by conJoination and disproportionation, respiectively. All the kinetic constants are depsendent upon the last monomer unit in the chain, i. e. terminal model is assumed. 

Flow-Enhanced Desorption of Adsorbed Flexible Polymer Chains... 

Polymer Adsorption. A review of the theory and measurement of polymer adsorption points out succinctly the distinquishing features of the behavior of macromolecules at solid - liquid interfaces (118). Polymer adsoiption and desorption kinetics are more complex than those of small molecules, mainly because of the lower diffusion rates of polymer chains in solution and the "rearrangement" of adsorbed chains on a solid surface, characterized by slowly formed, multi-point attachments. The latter point is one which is of special interest in protein adsoiption from aqueous solutions. In the case of proteins, initial adsoiption kinetics may be quite rapid. However, the slow rearrangement step may be much more important in terms of the function of the adsorbed layer in natural processes, such as thrombogenesis or biocorrosion / biofouling caused by cell adhesion. 

The discussion in the Introduction led to the convincing assumption that the strain-dependent behavior of filled rubbers is due to the break-down of filler networks within the rubber matrix. This conviction will be enhanced in the following sections. However, in contrast to this mechanism, sometimes alternative models have been proposed. Gui et al. theorized that the strain amplitude effect was due to deformation, flow and alignment of the rubber molecules attached to the filler particle [41 ]. Another concept has been developed by Smith [42]. He has indicated that a shell of hard rubber (bound rubber) of definite thickness surrounds the filler and the non-linearity in dynamic mechanical behavior is related to the desorption and reabsorption of the hard absorbed shell around the carbon black. In a similar way, recently Maier and Goritz suggested a Langmuir-type polymer chain adsorption on the filler surface to explain the Payne-effect [43]. 

After the nucleation period, three types of kinetic processes determine the kinetics of emulsion polymerization radical entry, radical desorption, and polymer chain formation in the polymer particles. The kinetics of emulsion polymerization are fully described by the following five dimensionless parameters ... 

Fast relaxation processes ( , 0) show a Williams-Landel-Ferry (WLF) type temperature dependence which is typical for the dynamics of polymer chains in the glass transition range. In accordance with NMR results, which are shown in Fig. 9, these relaxations are assigned to motions of chain units inside and outside the adsorption layer (0 and , respectively). The slowest dielectric relaxation (O) shows an Arrhenius-type behavior. It appears that the frequency of this relaxation is close to 1-10 kHz at 240 K, which was also estimated for the adsorption-desorption process by NMR (Fig. 9) [9]. Therefore, the slowest relaxation process is assigned to the dielectric losses from chain motion related to the adsorption-desorption. 

The above mechanistic explanations assume that the plasticizer molecules are not permanently bound to the polymer chains. Since these interactions are relatively weak, there is likely a dynamic adsorption/desorption at various locations among neighboring polymer chains. Accordingly, the plasticizer structure may be fine-tuned to affect its solubility/miscibility with the polymer, as well as its interactions with... 

The service performance of rubber products can be improved by the addition of fine particle size carbon blacks or silicas. The most important effects are improvements in wear resistance of tire treads and in sidewall resistance to tearing and fatigue cracking. This reinforcement varies with the particle size, surface nature, state of agglomeration and amount of the reinforcing agent and the nature of the elastomer. Carbon blacks normally are effective only with hydrocarbon rubbers. It seems likely that the reinforcement phenomenon relies on the physical adsorption of polymer chains on the solid surface and the ability of the elastomer molecules to slip over the filler surface without actual desorption or creation of voids. 

Fig. 13 Velocity dependence of frictional stress for a soft gel sliding on a smooth adhesive solid substrate. The result is based on the molecular picture in Fig. 12, which considers the thermal fluctuation of adsorption and desorption of the polymer chain, (a) The elastic term of the frictional stress of a gel. See text for a description of parameter u. (b) Summation of the elastic term and the viscous term. When v -C Vf, the characteristic polymer adsorption velocity, the elastic term is dominant. At v 2> the viscose term is dominant. Therefore, transition from elastic friction to lubrication occurs at the sliding velocity characterized by the polymer chain dynamics. (Modified from figure 1 in [65])...

The mass transfer in dense membranes takes place by diffusion in the free volume between the polymer chains of the membrane material. The external driving force for this process is a difference of the chemical potential A/r, of the permeating species i on either side of the membrane. This difference can be expressed as a concentration difference Ac, a partial pressure difference Ap or an electrical potential difference A . The transport mechanism involves three distinctive steps, (a) selective adsorption of the feed components to the membrane, the feed components are dissolved in the membrane material (b) diffusion of the dissolved species through the membrane, and (c) desorption of the permeating species at the permeate-side of the membrane assisted by an applied sweep gas or vacuum. 

---