Design software platforms

The technical architecture Apackage structure (for static dependencies) and collaborations (across technology components, such as UI, business object servers, and databases). These cover all domain-independent parts of the system hardware and software platforms infrastructure components such as middleware and databases utilities for logging, exceptions, start-up, and shutdown design standards and tools and the choice of... 

Design rules for technical architecture This defines the elements used and patterns followed systemwide for dealing with the computing infrastructure aspects of the design. It includes hardware and software platforms and tools, middleware and databases, and the choice of API standards and component architecture, such as JavaBeans or COM. These rules emerge in parallel with the activities in items 11 and 12 architecture models and implementations. 

The integration of safety-related appHcation software into SRECS shall include tests that are specified during the design and development phase to ensure the compatibility of the appHcation software with hardware and embedded software platform such that the functional and safety performance requirements are satisfied. 

Systematic faults occur due a combination of conditions resulting in a reproducible failure of the system, and are most often attributable to software issues in programmable safety systems. This failure may be a result of some error in design, operation or production process, installation and/or maintenance. Improper implementation of MOC at any stage could be responsible for systematic failure also. Device manufacturing errors can be addressed by diversity this increases the SIF complexity. Diversity can be applied to sensor, I/O technologies, control and software platforms, and even product development teams. Incorrect specification, implementation. 

If a software solution is being designed for the first time, our objective is to be able to formally model that software solution and to generate as much of implementation/ code from the model on as many software platforms as possible. This will serve our motivation to enable IT services comp>anies to support software solution development on multiple platforms. In cases where a software solution already exists on a platform, our objective is to reuse as much of that software solution as possible in making that solution available on multiple platforms. To investigate this cross-platform portability, we have selected two development platforms namely IBM s WebSphere platform consisting of WebSphere Business Services Fabric [19] and SAE s NetWeaver Developer Studio [20]. 

We hypothesize that by focusing on service level components of software design one can simplify the model extraction problem significantly while still achieving up to 40%-50% of model reusability. We have validated our hypotheses experimentally by transforming the derived platform independent model on to a different target software platform in 5 instances of business processes. This in essence is forward engineering the reverse... 

It is possible to designate this kind of value for respectively the exact explicit baseline data identifying properties hardware and software platform, operator and environmental hazards. 

Wartel, F. et al. Timing analysis of an avionics case study on complex hardware/-software platforms. In Proc. of the 18th Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE) (2015)... 

Good management requires the ability to stay current with technology. Eor this reason the EDS has been designed on a hardware platform (Eigure 4-99) that provides expansion capabilities for new hardware and software packages. The many available packages include ... 

---