Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Density matrix calculation

The second reason is related to the misconception that proton dipolar relaxation-rates for the average molecule are far too complicated for practical use in stereochemical problems. This belief has been encouraged, perhaps, by the formidable, density-matrix calculations " commonly used by physicists and physical chemists for a rigorous interpretation of relaxation phenomena in multispin systems. However, proton-relaxation experiments reported by Freeman, Hill, Hall, and their coworkers " have demonstrated that pessimism regarding the interpretation of proton relaxation-rates may be unjustified. Valuable information of considerable importance for the carbohydrate chemist may be derived for the average molecule of interest from a simple treatment of relaxation rates. [Pg.126]

J. R. Hammond and D. A. Mazziotti, Variational reduced-density-matrix calculations on radicals an alternative approach to open-shell ab initio quantum chemistry. Phys. Rev. A 73, 012509 (2006). [Pg.57]

The procedure gives a simple recursion because the a matrices are in lower diagonal form. Similar equations can be written for the original RDM p instead of the diadic form a. This recursive procedure has been previously tested by us for density matrix calculations and found to be reliable. [22]... [Pg.374]

We emphasize that the density matrix calculated from Eq. (6) is equivalent to that from Eq. (4), but Eq. (6) is much easier to compute for open systems. To see why this is so, let us consider zero temperature and assume ftL — ftR = eV], > 0. Then, in the energy range -oo < E < pR the Fermi functions = fR = 1. Because the Fermi functions are equal, no information about the non-equilibrium statistics exists and the NEGF must reduce to the equilibrium Green s function GR. In the range pR < E < pR, fL 7 fR and NEGF must be used in Eq. (6). A more careful mathematical manipulation shows that this is indeed true [30], and Eq. (6) can be written as a sum of two terms ... [Pg.129]

Stepisnik, J. (1981). Analysis of NMR self-diffusion measurements by density matrix calculation. Physica B 104, 350-364. [Pg.387]

Let us now turn to the problem switching on a model potential V(r) to the Hamiltonian used above. Denoting the canonical density matrix calculated there by = C(V =0), the simplest approximation is to follow the ideas of the Thomas-Fermi (TF) method. Then, with slowly varying V(r) for which the assumptions of this approximation are valid, one can return to the definition at Eq. (2.2), and simply move all eigenvalues a,- by the same (almost constant— ) amount F(r), the wavefunctions ( i(r) being unaffected to the same order of approximation. Hence one can write for the diagonal form of the canonical density matrix... [Pg.82]

The explicit density matrix calculation is accomplished by the definition of a density matrix for a particular spin system and by the operation of the Hamiltonian s on the density matrix. In the resulting density matrix (Jfinai diagonal elements provide the population of the corresponding spin states whilst the off-diagonal elements represent the transitions. [Pg.24]

As shown for the simple example in Fig. 2.2 explicit density matrix calculation can be cumbersome and this approach is often not recommended for complex pulse sequences, particularly if large data matrices of multi-spin systems or multi-pulse sequences must be evaluated. Consequently different operator formalisms [2.15 - 2.19] using Cartesian, spherical, shift, polarization and tensor operators, based on different coordinate systems or basic functions, have been developed where each formalism is suitable for a particular type of problem. The criteria used to select the appropriate formalism depend on the spin system being described ... [Pg.24]

Stepisnik J 1981 Analysis of NMR self-diffusion measurements by a density-matrix calculation Physica B/C 104 350-64... [Pg.1546]

In the following we will examine transient hole-burning in a multilevel system using a density matrix calculation. It will be shown that with an appropriate extrapolation procedure from the observed hole-width not only optical Tj can be measured but also the transition dipole and intramolecular relaxation constants may be obtained. We will then proceed by using a kinetic model to examine the effect of an irreversible decay channel (photochemistry) on the hole-width. A detailed account of this work will be published elsewhere. ... [Pg.435]

Before going on to consider more complicated systems, we review here some of the basic behavior of a two-state quantum system in the presence of a fast stochastic bath. This highly simplified bath model is useful because it allows qualitatively meaningful results to be obtained from a density matrix calculation when bath correlation functions are not available in fact, the bath coupling to any given system operator is reduced to a scalar. In the case of the two-level system, analytic results for the density matrix dynamics are easily obtained, and these provide an important reference point for discussing more complicated systems, both because it is often possible to isolate important parts of more complicated systems as effective two-level systems and because many aspects of the dynamics of multilevel systems appear already at this level. An earlier discussion of the two-level system can be found in Ref. 80. The more... [Pg.98]

Y.B. Band, P.S. Julienne, Density matrix calculation of population transfer between vibrational levels of Na2 by stimulated Raman scattering with temporally shifted laser beams, J. Chem. Phys. 94 (1991) 5291. [Pg.158]

Then, the conventional density matrix calculation procedure can be replaced by the above G -based method (Fig. 11.7). Using the converged electron density, we can calculate transmission coefficients as a function of energy and current (/) at the given bias voltage (Vb) through the Landauer-Biittiker formula as follows ... [Pg.328]

The unrestricted and restricted open-sheU Hartree-Fock Methods (UHF and ROHF) for crystals use a single-determinant wavefunction of type (4.40) introduced for molecules. The differences appearing are common with those examined for the RHF LCAO method use of Bloch functions for crystalline orbitals, the dependence of the Fock matrix elements on the lattice sums over the direct lattice and the Brillouin-zone summation in the density matrix calculation. The use of one-determinant approaches is the only possibility of the first-principles wavefunction-based calculations for crystals as the many-determinant wavefunction approach (used for molecules) is practically unrealizable for the periodic systems. The UHF LCAO method allowed calculation of the bulk properties of different transition-metal compounds (oxides, perovskites) the qrstems with open shells due to the transition-metal atom. We discuss the results of these calculations in Chap. 9. The point defects in crystals in many cases form the open-sheU systems and also are interesting objects for UHF LCAO calculations (see Chap. 10). [Pg.122]

The semiempirical methods are based on the simplification of the HF LCAO Hamiltonian and require the iterative (self-consistent) density matrix calculations complete and intermediate neglect of differential overlap (CNDO and INDO - approximations), neglect of diatomic differential overlap (NDDO) and others, using the neglect of differential overlap (NDO) approximation. [Pg.193]

The sum (6.50) can be calculated for k kj, for example, by the Ewald method. However, for k = kj the series (6.50) appears to be divergent [95]. This divergence is the result of the general asymptotic properties of the approximate density matrix calculated by the summation over the special poits of BZ (see Sect. 4.3.3). The difficulties connected with the divergence of lattice sums in the exchange part have been resolved in CNDO calculations of solids by introduction of an interaction radius... [Pg.210]

The results obtained in post-HF methods for solids refer mainly to the energy of the ground state but do not provide the correlated density matrix. The latter is calculated for sohds in the one-determinant approximation. The density matrix calculated for crystals in RHF or ROHF one-determinant methods describes the many-electron state with the fixed total spin (zero in RHF or defined by the maximal possible spin projection in ROHF). Meanwhile, the UHF one-determinant approximation formally corresponds to the mixture of many-electron states with the different total spin allowed for the fixed total spin projection. Therefore, one can expect that the UHF approach partly takes into account the electron correlation. In particular, of interest is the question to what extent UHF method may account for correlation effects on the chemical bonding in transition-metal oxides. An answer to this question can be obtained in the framework of the molecular-crystalline approach, proposed in [577] to evaluate the correlation corrections in the study of chemical bonding in crystals. [Pg.332]

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF NMR SPECTRA AND DENSITY MATRIX CALCULATION ALONG AN ALGORITHM IMPLEMENTATION... [Pg.183]

Wavepacket calculations at r = 0 K were carried out for the combined 4-mode subsystem plus 20-mode bath, using the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method [51-53]. The explicit representation of all bath modes is not a necessity (and, in fact, the general method is designed so as to treat only the effective modes explicitly) however, an explicit wavepacket dynamics for all modes is convenient to demonstrate the convergence of the procedure for a zero-temperature system. In Refs. [32,33], we have shown that explicit calculations for high-dimensional system-plus-bath wavefunctions are in excellent agreement with reduced density matrix calculations. [Pg.280]

The chemical system under study requires a description of spin-relaxation on the hydroxyl radicals, as it is this parameter which is hypothesised to produce the observed polarisation phase. For the purpose of this work a new algorithm has been developed to model this effect using the wavefunction of the system (as first suggested by B. Brocklehurst, unpublished), which requires far fewer computational resources than a traditional density matrix calculation would typically utilise, allowing many more realisations to be computed (required to obtain acceptable statistics in the spin polarisation). This has not been previously attempted with a random flights or IRT simulation. [Pg.145]


See other pages where Density matrix calculation is mentioned: [Pg.523]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.368]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.684 , Pg.685 , Pg.686 , Pg.687 , Pg.688 ]




SEARCH



Density calculating

Density calculations

Density matrix

Matrix calculations

© 2024 chempedia.info