Density functional theory potential

L and W C Mackrodt 1994. Density Functional Theory and Interionic Potentials. Philosophical gazine B69-.871-878. 

J Li, MR Nelson, CY Peng, D Bashford, L Noodleman. Incorporating protein environments in density functional theory A self-consistent reaction field calculation of redox potentials of [2Ee2S] clusters in feiTedoxm and phthalate dioxygenase reductase. J Phys Chem A 102 6311-6324, 1998. 

Fig. 10(a) presents a comparison of computer simulation data with the predictions of both density functional theories presented above [144]. The computations have been carried out for e /k T = 7 and for a bulk fluid density equal to pi, = 0.2098. One can see that the contact profiles, p(z = 0), obtained by different methods are quite similar and approximately equal to 0.5. We realize that the surface effects extend over a wide region, despite the very simple and purely repulsive character of the particle-wall potential. However, the theory of Segura et al. [38,39] underestimates slightly the range of the surface zone. On the other hand, the modified Meister-Kroll-Groot theory [145] leads to a more correct picture. 

Let us underline some similarities and differences between a field theory (FT) and a density functional theory (DFT). First, note that for either FT or DFT the standard microscopic-level Hamiltonian is not the relevant quantity. The DFT is based on the existence of a unique functional of ionic densities H[p+(F), p (F)] such that the grand potential Q, of the studied system is the minimum value of the functional Q relative to any variation of the densities, and then the trial density distributions for which the minimum is achieved are the average equihbrium distributions. Only some schemes of approximations exist in order to determine Q. In contrast to FT no functional integrations are involved in the calculations. In FT we construct the effective Hamiltonian p f)] which never reduces to a thermo-... 

Besides the already mentioned Fukui function, there are a couple of other commonly used concepts which can be connected with Density Functional Theory (Chapter 6). The electronic chemical potential p is given as the first derivative of the energy with respect to the number of electrons, which in a finite difference version is given as half the sum of the ionization potential and the electron affinity. Except for a difference in sign, this is exactly the Mulliken definition of electronegativity. ... 

Addition of these two inequalities gives Eq + Eo>Eq + Eo, showing that the assumption was wrong. In other words, for the ground state there is a one-to-one correspondence between the electron density and the nuclear potential, and thereby also with the Hamilton operator and tlie energy. In the language of Density Functional Theory, the energy is a unique functional of the electron density, [p]. 

Only the structures of di- and trisulfane have been determined experimentally. For a number of other sulfanes structural information is available from theoretical calculations using either density functional theory or ab initio molecular orbital theory. In all cases the unbranched chain has been confirmed as the most stable structure but these chains can exist as different ro-tamers and, in some cases, as enantiomers. However, by theoretical methods information about the structures and stabilities of additional isomeric sul-fane molecules with branched sulfur chains and cluster-like structures was obtained which were identified as local minima on the potential energy hypersurface (see later). 

Assuming that substituted Sb at the surface may work as catalytic active site as well as W, First-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed with Becke-Perdew [7, 9] functional to evaluate the binding energy between p-xylene and catalyst. Scalar relativistic effects were treated with the energy-consistent pseudo-potentials for W and Sb. However, the binding strength with p-xylene is much weaker for Sb (0.6 eV) than for W (2.4 eV), as shown in Fig. 4. 

Figure 6.35. Potential energy diagrams for adsorption and dissociation of N2on a Ru(0001) surface and on the same surface with a monoatomic step, as calculated with a density functional theory procedure. [Adapted from S. Dahl, A. Logadottir, R. Egberg, J. Larsen, I. Chorkendorff,...

In density functional theories the potential is determined by the density, and consequently its Fourier components are related to those of the density. One can therefore connect the symmetry properties of the momentum funetions, in other words the transformation... 

While in previous ab initio smdies the reconstructed surface was mostly simulated as Au(lll), Feng et al. [2005] have recently performed periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations on a realistic system in which they used a (5 x 1) unit cell and added an additional atom to the first surface layer. In their calculations, the electrode potential was included by charging the slab and placing a reference electrode (with the counter charge) in the middle of the vacuum region. From the surface free energy curves, which were evaluated on the basis of experimentally measured capacities, they concluded that there is no necessity for specific ion adsorption [Bohnen and Kolb, 1998] and that the positive surface charge alone would be sufficient to lift the reconstmction. 

However, even the best experimental technique typically does not provide a detailed mechanistic picture of a chemical reaction. Computational quantum chemical methods such as the ab initio molecular orbital and density functional theory (DFT) " methods allow chemists to obtain a detailed picture of reaction potential energy surfaces and to elucidate important reaction-driving forces. Moreover, these methods can provide valuable kinetic and thermodynamic information (i.e., heats of formation, enthalpies, and free energies) for reactions and species for which reactivity and conditions make experiments difficult, thereby providing a powerful means to complement experimental data. 

The attractive potential exerted on the electrons due to the nuclei - the expectation value of the second operator VNe in equation (1-4) - is also often termed the external potential, Vext, in density functional theory, even though the external potential is not necessarily limited to the nuclear field but may include external magnetic or electric fields etc. From now on we will only consider the electronic problem of equations (1 -4) - (1 -6) and the subscript elec will be dropped. 

Since the Fock operator is a effective one-electron operator, equation (1-29) describes a system of N electrons which do not interact among themselves but experience an effective potential VHF. In other words, the Slater determinant is the exact wave function of N noninteracting particles moving in the field of the effective potential VHF.5 It will not take long before we will meet again the idea of non-interacting systems in the discussion of the Kohn-Sham approach to density functional theory. 

In the preceding paragraph we have given a detailed survey of the Kohn-Sham approach to density functional theory. Now, we need to discuss some of the relevant properties pertaining to this scheme and how we have to interpret the various quantities it produces. We also will mention some areas connected to Kohn-Sham density functional theory which are still problematic. Before we enter this discussion the reader should be reminded to differentiate carefully between results that apply to the hypothetical situation in which the exact functional ExC and the corresponding potential Vxc are known and the real world in which we have to use approximations to these quantities. 

---