Density functional theory methods determination

Density Functional Theory Methods In parallel to the development of ab initio theory, it was theorized that all molecular properties could be described as a function of the electron density [24]. By using mathematical functions, called functionals, to describe the electron density, a new theoretical approach, density functional theory (DFT), was developed. In 1965, Kohn and Sham [25] produced a set of equations that demonstrated how to determine a self-consistent density from DFT decomposition of the Schrodinger equation ... 

The pore size distribution (PSD) for mesopores and micropores were calcnlated nsing DFT (Density Functional Theory) method and the resnlting distribntion cnrves are given in Fig. 21.3. Total mesopore volume (V ) was determined as... 

The reactions for which thermochemical properties of transition states are calculated by ab initio or Density Functional Theory methods, oo s are fit by three parameters n, and over the temperature range of 298-2000 K, kao = A T)T exp( a/ 7). Entropy differences between the reactants and transition state structures are used to determine the pre-exponential factor. A, via canonical Transition State Theory [197]. 

Distinguish between semi-empirical, ab initio, and density functional theory methods of electronic structure determination. 

Determination of Heats of Formation by Ab Initio and Density Functional Theory Methods... 

DETERMINATION OF HEATS OF FORMATION BY AB INITIO AND DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY METHODS... 

A basis set is a set of functions used to describe the shape of the orbitals in an atom. Molecular orbitals and entire wave functions are created by taking linear combinations of basis functions and angular functions. Most semiempirical methods use a predehned basis set. When ah initio or density functional theory calculations are done, a basis set must be specihed. Although it is possible to create a basis set from scratch, most calculations are done using existing basis sets. The type of calculation performed and basis set chosen are the two biggest factors in determining the accuracy of results. This chapter discusses these standard basis sets and how to choose an appropriate one. 

Vibrational Spectra Many of the papers quoted below deal with the determination of vibrational spectra. The method of choice is B3-LYP density functional theory. In most cases, MP2 vibrational spectra are less accurate. In order to allow for a comparison between computed frequencies within the harmonic approximation and anharmonic experimental fundamentals, calculated frequencies should be scaled by an empirical factor. This procedure accounts for systematic errors and improves the results considerably. The easiest procedure is to scale all frequencies by the same factor, e.g., 0.963 for B3-LYP/6-31G computed frequencies [95JPC3093]. A more sophisticated but still pragmatic approach is the SQM method [83JA7073], in which the underlying force constants (in internal coordinates) are scaled by different scaling factors. 

The ab initio methods used by most investigators include Hartree-Fock (FFF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) [6, 7]. An ab initio method typically uses one of many basis sets for the solution of a particular problem. These basis sets are discussed in considerable detail in references [1] and [8]. DFT is based on the proof that the ground state electronic energy is determined completely by the electron density [9]. Thus, there is a direct relationship between electron density and the energy of a system. DFT calculations are extremely popular, as they provide reliable molecular structures and are considerably faster than FFF methods where correlation corrections (MP2) are included. Although intermolecular interactions in ion-pairs are dominated by dispersion interactions, DFT (B3LYP) theory lacks this term [10-14]. FFowever, DFT theory is quite successful in representing molecular structure, which is usually a primary concern. 

Only the structures of di- and trisulfane have been determined experimentally. For a number of other sulfanes structural information is available from theoretical calculations using either density functional theory or ab initio molecular orbital theory. In all cases the unbranched chain has been confirmed as the most stable structure but these chains can exist as different ro-tamers and, in some cases, as enantiomers. However, by theoretical methods information about the structures and stabilities of additional isomeric sul-fane molecules with branched sulfur chains and cluster-like structures was obtained which were identified as local minima on the potential energy hypersurface (see later). 

The determination of the electronic structure of lanthanide-doped materials and the prediction of the optical properties are not trivial tasks. The standard ligand field models lack predictive power and undergoes parametric uncertainty at low symmetry, while customary computation methods, such as DFT, cannot be used in a routine manner for ligand field on lanthanide accounts. The ligand field density functional theory (LFDFT) algorithm23-30 consists of a customized conduct of nonempirical DFT calculations, extracting reliable parameters that can be used in further numeric experiments, relevant for the prediction in luminescent materials science.31 These series of parameters, which have to be determined in order to analyze the problem of two-open-shell 4f and 5d electrons in lanthanide materials, are as follows. 

Conventional bulk measurements of adsorption are performed by determining the amount of gas adsorbed at equilibrium as a function of pressure, at a constant temperature [23-25], These bulk adsorption isotherms are commonly analyzed using a kinetic theory for multilayer adsorption developed in 1938 by Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (the BET Theory) [23]. BET adsorption isotherms are a common material science technique for surface area analysis of porous solids, and also permit calculation of adsorption energy and fractional surface coverage. While more advanced analysis methods, such as Density Functional Theory, have been developed in recent years, BET remains a mainstay of material science, and is the recommended method for the experimental measurement of pore surface area. This is largely due to the clear physical meaning of its principal assumptions, and its ability to handle the primary effects of adsorbate-adsorbate and adsorbate-substrate interactions. 

---