Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Density functional expansions

Accordingly, we express (F(t)F(0)> in terms of an effective thermodynamic potential A, which itself is calculated from the following many-component density functional expansion (84) ... [Pg.656]

Win). Either the analogy to the lattice-gas model or the density functional expansion discussed briefly in Chapter 1, suggests that for systems with short-range interactions, the gas-liquid profile is determined by the minimization of the interfacial free energy ... [Pg.71]

This approximate form can be derived many ways from renormalized second-order perturbation theoryGaussian (linear response) density field theory,or via density functional expansions. Pictorially, the medium-induced potential between a pair of tagged sites is determined by coupling to the surroundings via an effective potential (direct correlation function), which is mediated by density fiuctuations of the condensed phase. The integrated strength of the medium-induced potential is... [Pg.105]

In view of the dramatic failure of the local thermodynamic approximations (35), it is natural to attempt to improve them by considering density functional expansions which take into account the nonlocal gradient correction terms. Standard density functional methods yield... [Pg.32]

Relativistic density functional theory can be used for all electron calculations. Relativistic DFT can be formulated using the Pauli formula or the zero-order regular approximation (ZORA). ZORA calculations include only the zero-order term in a power series expansion of the Dirac equation. ZORA is generally regarded as the superior method. The Pauli method is known to be unreliable for very heavy elements, such as actinides. [Pg.263]

When the MFA is used in absence of the external field (J,- = 0) the Lagrange multipliers //, are assumed to give the actual density, p, known by construction. In presence of the field the MFA gives a correction Spi to the density p,. By using the linear response theory we can establish a hnear functional relation between J, and 8pi. The fields Pi r) can be expressed in term of a new field 8pi r) defined according to Pi r) = pi + 8pi + 8pi r). Now, we may perform a functional expansion of in terms of 8pi f). If this expansion is limited to a quadratic form in 8pj r) we get the following result [32]... [Pg.813]

In this volume dedicated to Yngve Ohm we feel it is particularly appropriate to extend his ideas and merge them with the powerful practical and conceptual tools of Density Functional Theory (6). We extend the formalism used in the TDVP to mixed states and consider the states to be labeled by the densities of electronic space and spin coordinates. (In the treatment presented here we do not explicitly consider the nuclei but consider them to be fixed. Elsewhere we shall show that it is indeed straightforward to extend our treatment in the same way as Ohm et al. and obtain equations that avoid the Bom-Oppenheimer Approximation.) In this article we obtain a formulation of exact equations for the evolution of electronic space-spin densities, which are equivalent to the Heisenberg equation of motion for the electtons in the system. Using the observation that densities can be expressed as quadratic expansions of functions, we also obtain exact equations for Aese one-particle functions. [Pg.219]

Stener and co-workers [59] used an alternative B-spline LCAO density functional theory (DFT) method in their PECD investigations [53, 57, 60-63]. In this approach a normal LCAO basis set is adapted for the continuum by the addition of B-spline radial functions. A large single center expansion of such... [Pg.283]

Wang, F. and Li, L. (2002) A singularity excluded approximate expansion scheme in relativistic density functional theory. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 108, 53-60. [Pg.229]

According to the aspherical-atom formalism proposed by Stewart [12], the one-electron density function is represented by an expansion in terms of rigid pseudoatoms, each formed by a core-invariant part and a deformable valence part. Spherical surface harmonics (multipoles) are employed to describe the directional properties of the deformable part. Our model consisted of two monopole (three for the sulfur atom), three dipole, five quadrupole, and seven octopole functions for each non-H atom. The generalised scattering factors (GSF) for the monopoles of these species were computed from the Hartree-Fockatomic functions tabulated by Clementi [14]. [Pg.287]

This approximation amounts to truncating the functional expansion of the excess free energy at second order in the density profile. This approach is accurate for Lennard-Jones fluids under some conditions, but has fallen out of favor because it is not capable of describing wetting transitions and coexisting liquid-vapor phases [105-107]. Incidentally, this approximation is identical to the hypemetted chain closure to the wall-OZ equation [103]. [Pg.119]

Of the many quantum chemical approaches available, density-functional theory (DFT) has over the past decade become a key method, with applications ranging from interstellar space, to the atmosphere, the biosphere and the solid state. The strength of the method is that whereas conventional ah initio theory includes electron correlation by use of a perturbation series expansion, or increasing orders of excited state configurations added to zero-order Hartree-Fock solutions, DFT methods inherently contain a large fraction of the electron correlation already from the start, via the so-called exchange-correlation junctional. [Pg.114]

From this wave function, one sees how even in the early beginning of molecular quantum mechanics, atomic orbitals were used to construct molecular wave functions. This explains why one of the first AIM definitions relied on atomic orbitals. Nowadays, molecular ab initio calculations are usually carried out using basis sets consisting of basis functions that mimic atomic orbitals. Expanding the electron density in the set of natural orbitals and introducing the basis function expansion leads to [15]... [Pg.218]


See other pages where Density functional expansions is mentioned: [Pg.71]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.1177]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.760]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.62]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 ]




SEARCH



Correlation function density expansion

Density expansion

Density functionals construction using gradient expansion

Expansion function

Functional expansion

Taylor expansions density functional theory

© 2024 chempedia.info