Denaturant binding model

This analysis can be tentatively based on the denaturant binding model by Aune and Tanford [206], The model assumes that urea or GuHCI can bind to different independent sites of native and denatured conformations of the protein. Following this line, the DSC trace obtained in the presence of these denaturants can be simulated (see Appendix A4.2) according to the canonical partition function formalism [162,197],... 

The validity of this linear extrapolation model (LEM) was proven for monomeric proteins in many cases. Often the LEM is applied even without considering its applicability with the result that the m value has become generally recognized as a standard empirical parameter. The strength of the LEM lies in its simplicity. It is not necessary to calculate denaturant activities, which is an additional source of errors as in the case of the Tanford binding model. Also, the LEM has only one parameter (m), whereas the binding model has two (A and k) if one extrapolates the free energy toward zero denaturant concentration with the function... 

The second hypothesis claims that the denaturants preferentially bind to the snr-face of the proteins (Timasheff 2002a) the larger the snrface area, the more denatur-ant molecules are bound to each protein the denatured state therefore becomes more stable than the native state. Both of these proposals have been founded upon primitive and antiquated models of solutions the lattice theory of solution is the foundation of the water structure breaker hypothesis (Frank and Franks 1968), whereas the stoichiometric binding model of solvation is the basis of the preferential binding hypothesis (Scheltman 1987 Timasheff 2002a). Consequently, the weak theoretical foundation had prompted much debate, not only over the validity of these hypotheses, but also over the true meaning of these hypotheses at a molecular level. 

Collectively, these thermal denaturation studies demonstrated that aPNAs bind to complementary ssDNA targets with high affinity and in a sequence-specific manner consistent with our proposed base-pairing model. Additional electrostatic and hydrophobic binding interactions can be incorporated into the aPNA design without affecting the primary Watson-Crick binding mode. 

The Influence of DNA Structure and Environment on the Intercalation of Hydrocarbon Metabolites and Metabolite Model Compounds. The physical binding of hydrocarbon metabolites to DNA is very sensitive to DNA structure and environment. This is demonstrated by the data in Figures 4 and 5, which show how heat denaturation of DNA inhibits hydrocarbon quenching. These results are consistent with early studies which indicate that the ability of native DNA to solubilize pyrene and BP is much greater than that of denatured DNA (40). 

FIGURE 25-12 Model for initiation of replication at the E. coli origin, oriC. (D About 20 DnaA protein molecules, each with a bound ATP, bind at the four 9 bp repeats. The DNA is wrapped around this complex. The three A=T-rich 13 bp repeats are denatured sequentially. (3) Hexamers of the DnaB protein bind to each strand, with the aid of DnaC protein. The DnaB helicase activity further unwinds the DNA in preparation for priming and DNA synthesis. 

A consequence of Equation 19 is that preferential and absolute interactions, when expressed as binding, do not necessarily vary in parallel manner when the solvent composition is changed. The values of A3 and (dgs/dg 2)t,mi,m3 may actually assume opposite signs. This is easily illustrated with the help of Figure 1. In the model system depicted, it is assumed that the protein binds a constant amount of water at all solvent compositions thus Ai remains constant. It also binds a monotonely increasing amount of the denaturant (A3 increases) as the proportion of the latter is increased in the medium. Relative to the bulk solvent composition, however, the net observed effect is one of preferential binding of denaturant, when the latter is present in small amounts in the solvent,... 

The serine proteases act by forming and hydrolyzing an ester on a serine residue. This was initially established using the nerve gas diisopropyl fluorophosphate, which inactivates serine proteases as well as acetylcholinesterase. It is a very potent inhibitor (it essentially binds in a 1 1 stoichiometry and thus can be used to titrate the active sites) and is extremely toxic in even low amounts. Careful acid or enzymatic hydrolysis (see Section 9.3.6.) of the inactivated enzyme yielded O-phosphoserine, and the serine was identified as residue 195 in the sequence. Chy-motrypsin acts on the compound cinnamoylimidazole, producing an acyl intermediate called cinnamoyl-enzyme which hydrolyzes slowly. This fact was exploited in an active-site titration (see Section 9.2.5.). Cinnamoyl-CT features a spectrum similar to that of the model compound O-cinnamoylserine, on denaturation of the enzyme in urea the spectrum was identical to that of O-acetylserine. Serine proteases act on both esters and amides. 

---