Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Data generation models

The simulation models of the flow-sheeting system must make frequent requests for properties at specific temperatures, pressures, and compositions. Computer-program calls for such data are usually made in a rigorously defined manner, which is independent of both the point data generation models and the particular components. These point generation routines provide the property values, using selected methods that base their calculations on a set of parameters for each component. [Pg.76]

For scenarios I-III and VI, the study design was chosen as using the original doses of 0,1, and 4 puffs. Scenario IV and V aimed at studying the effect of model misspecification, that is, when the data do not allow accurate estimation of the E model. Because edso was 2.99 puffs in the data generation model, the study design using doses of 0,1, and 2 puffs as chosen for scenarios IV and V. [Pg.442]

In each simulation scenario, 1000 runs were simulated. In each run, a set of 40 subjects and their responses were generated based on the data generation model. This number of subjects was somewhat larger than normal trials conducted, based on the consideration that power may be lacking in available PD BE assessment situations. This difference was not expected to affect the relative performance of the methods. For each simulation run, the bias of estimating F was calculated, and the resulting 10%, 50%, and 90% percentiles of the distribution from the 1000 runs are given in Table 16.5. [Pg.442]

Figure 1.5 Sample residual plot. Paired (x, Y) data were simulated using the model Y = 13 + 1.25x + 0.265x2. To each Y value was added random error from a normal distribution with mean zero and standard deviation 25. The top plot is a plot ordinary residuals versus predicted values when the fitted model was a second-order polynomial, the same model as the data-generating model. The bottom plot is the same plot when the fitted model was linear model (no quadratic term). Residual plots should appear as a shotgun blast (like the top plot) with no systematic trend (like the bottom plot). Figure 1.5 Sample residual plot. Paired (x, Y) data were simulated using the model Y = 13 + 1.25x + 0.265x2. To each Y value was added random error from a normal distribution with mean zero and standard deviation 25. The top plot is a plot ordinary residuals versus predicted values when the fitted model was a second-order polynomial, the same model as the data-generating model. The bottom plot is the same plot when the fitted model was linear model (no quadratic term). Residual plots should appear as a shotgun blast (like the top plot) with no systematic trend (like the bottom plot).
Another example that leads to ill conditioning is when the data do not support the model, even the data generating model. A simpler model may provide an adequate fit even though it is not the true model. Consider the data presented in Fig. 3.8. The data values were generated using the model... [Pg.111]

In contrast, the data in the top plot of Fig. 4.2 using a constant residual variance model led to the following parameter estimates after fitting the same model volume of distribution =10.2 0.10L, clearance = 1.49 0.008 L/h, and absorption rate constant = 0.71 0.02 per h. Note that this model is the data generating model with no regression assumption violations. The residual plots from this analysis are shown in Fig. 4.4. None of the residual plots show any trend or increasing variance with increasing predicted value. Notice that the parameter estimates are less biased and have smaller standard errors than the estimates obtained from the constant variance plus proportional error model. [Pg.129]

There have only been a few studies comparing the different covariate selection methods with most using Monte Carlo comparisons where the true data generating model is known. It should be stressed at the outset that no method is universally superior to the others— they all sometimes choose the wrong covariates or miss important covariates. Most often the choice of selection method is a personal one dependent on the analysis and analyst. [Pg.239]

The advantage of the maximum likelihood is that it will be efficient if the likelihood function matches the true data-generating model. If it does not, then the... [Pg.191]

In many cases, the methods used to solve identification problems are based on an iterative minimization of some performance criterion measuring the dissimilarity between the experimental and the synthetic data (generated by the current estimate of the direct model). In our case, direct quantitative comparison of two Bscan images at the pixels level is a very difficult task and involves the solution of a very difficult optimization problem, which can be also ill-behaved. Moreover, it would lead to a tremendous amount of computational burden. Segmented Bscan images may be used as concentrated representations of the useful... [Pg.172]

Prediction implies the generation of unknown properties. On the basis of example data, a model is established which is able to relate an object to its property. This model can then be used for predicting values for new data vectors. [Pg.473]

Reproducibility Various aspects of QRA are highly subjective—the results are very sensitive to the analyst s assumptions. The same problem, using identical data and models, may generate widely varying answers when analyzed by different experts. [Pg.46]

Calculate New Data) generates a statistically similar ordinate value for each Xi by superimposing ND(0, s ) noise on the model or previous data this option can be repeatedly accessed. [Pg.381]

Even though the model was derived based on first order deactivation of active centres, it was found that the model is equally capable of fitting data generated from a distribution of active sites undergoing second order decay. [Pg.406]

We currently model, at least in simple fashion, all resins scaled-up which have an exothermic stage, in order to assess safety implications and utilise plant to its highest productivity regarding heat removal. The data generated is used in verification of kinetics models. [Pg.463]

The way in which the family of models is selected depends on the main purpose of the exercise. If the purpose is just to provide a reasonable description of the data in some appropriate way without any attempt at understanding the underlying phenomenon, that is, the data-generating mechanism, then the family of models is selected based on its adequacy to represent the data structure. The net result in this case is only a descriptive model of the phenomenon. These models are very useful for discriminating between alternative hypotheses but are totally useless for capturing the fundamental characteristics of a mechanism. On the contrary, if the purpose of the mode-... [Pg.71]

Figure 18.2 Representative receiver operator curves to demonstrate the leave n out validation of K-PLS classification models (metabolite formed or not formed) derived with approximately 300 molecules and over 60 descriptors. The diagonal line represents random. The horizontal axis represents the percentage of false positives and the vertical axis the percentage of false negatives in each case. a. Al-dealkylation. b. O-dealkylation. c. Aromatic hydroxylation. d. Aliphatic hydroxylation. e. O-glucuronidation. f. O-sulfation. Data generated in collaboration with Dr. Mark Embrechts (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute). Figure 18.2 Representative receiver operator curves to demonstrate the leave n out validation of K-PLS classification models (metabolite formed or not formed) derived with approximately 300 molecules and over 60 descriptors. The diagonal line represents random. The horizontal axis represents the percentage of false positives and the vertical axis the percentage of false negatives in each case. a. Al-dealkylation. b. O-dealkylation. c. Aromatic hydroxylation. d. Aliphatic hydroxylation. e. O-glucuronidation. f. O-sulfation. Data generated in collaboration with Dr. Mark Embrechts (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute).
In this chapter we revisited an old problem, namely, exploring the information provided by a set of (x, y) operation data records and learn from it how to improve the behavior of the performance variable, y. Although some of the ideas and methodologies presented can be applied to other types of situations, we defined as our primary target an analysis at the supervisory control level of (x, y) data, generated by systems that cannot be described effectively through first-principles models, and whose performance depends to a large extent on quality-related issues and measurements. [Pg.152]

Based on the limitations of using human subjects, simple alternative in vitro models were developed to investigate mechanisms involved in the intestinal absorption process of a compound of interest and to screen the relative bioavailability of a compound from various food matrices. However, the data generated from in vitro approaches must be taken with caution because they are obtained under relatively simplified and static conditions compared to dynamic physiological in vivo conditions. Indeed, the overall bioavailability of a compound is the result of several complex steps that are influenced by many factors including factors present in the gastrointestinal lumen and intestinal cells as described later. Nevertheless, these in vitro approaches are useful tools for guiding further smdies in humans. [Pg.152]


See other pages where Data generation models is mentioned: [Pg.3]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.1319]    [Pg.1642]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.1040]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 , Pg.40 ]




SEARCH



Data generation

Data modeling

Generating models

Model Generator

Model generation

© 2024 chempedia.info