Dangerous reactions parameters

Finaiiy, carbon chains that have an unsaturated bond, an aromatic ring or another group, can cause dangerous reactions which involve these structural elements or groups. In this case, the simultaneous presence of these structural parameters can boost their reactivity due to the electronic effects that they exert on each other. 

Comparsion between eq. (3.41) and (3.42) illustrates the apparent danger of deriving reaction mechanism from kinetic data obtained in a narrow domain of reaction parameters, as depending on the concentration domain of B the rate can be either first order or zero order with respect to B. 

Statistical techniques can be employed to processes on production scale as well to those in the laboratory. However, on production scale, the changes to the reaction parameters will always be made in very small increments so as not to significantly jeopardise the yield and so each experiment will be repeated many times to ensure consistency before any conclusions are drawn. It is also essential to ensure that safety is never compromised as there are known cases where yield optimisation has transformed a safe process into a lethally dangerous one. 

The reaction between hydrogen and oxygen leads to the formation of water. This reaction has extended explosive regimes with respect to the p,T,c-parameters. A mechanistic analysis of the elementary reactions is available and the explosion mechanisms are imderstood in detail. Accordingly, this reaction serves well as a model for other dangerous processes in the explosive regime such as many oxidations with pure oxygen. 

Heat of reaction, selected by Heikkila et al. (1996), measures the energy available from the reaction. A high heat of reaction may generate higher temperatures and dangerous runaway reactions. Another parameter to consider controllability of a reaction is reaction rate. Reaction rate does not directly express the hazardousness of a reaction (e.g. when the heat of reaction is low). Thus it has been excluded from the list of chosen parameters. 

Every model has limitations. Even the most robust and best-validated regression model will not predict the outcome for all catalysts. Therefore, you must define the application domain of the model. Usually, interpolation within the model space will yield acceptable results. Extrapolation is more dangerous, and should be done only in cases where the new catalysts or reaction conditions are sufficiently close to the model. There are several statistical parameters for measuring this closeness, such as the distance to the nearest neighbor within the model space (see the discussion on catalyst diversity in Section 6.3.5). Another approach uses the effective prediction domain (EPD), which defines the prediction boundaries of regression models with correlated variables [105]. 

Boldyreva [26] has criticized the use of the NIK approach for the determination of kinetic parameters and reaction mechanisms in the absence of more direct studies, and states that in certain technological situations, e.g. processes carried out under non-isothermal conditions, the rapidity with which the information is obtained and the similarities between laboratory and process conditions "may compensate for the absence of a physical meaning". Maciejewski [27] has also provided critical discussions of the usefulness of kinetic data for solid state reactions and has warned of the dangers of regarding measured kinetic parameters as being characteristic of the compound being studied, without reference to the experimental conditions used. 

The rate constant A is a composite parameter, k = ELk, where E is the effectiveness factor, L the concentration of active sites on the surface of the catalyst, and k the actual rate constant of the transformation of the adsorbed species. The effectiveness factor which can attain values from zero to one is a measure of retardation of the reaction by diffusion of reactants or products into or out ofthe pores of the catalyst. For our purpose it should have a value of one or near to one and with careful experimentation this can be achieved. According to Thiele (14) the effectiveness factor is a function of reaction rate and effective diffusion coefficient. Both these parameters depend on the structure of the reacting compound and therefore the effectiveness factor will tend to change with the nature of the substituents. The effect of structure on reaction rate is more critical than on diffusion coefficient and if the reactivity within the series of investigated compounds will vary over some orders there is always danger of diffusional retardation in the case of the most reactive members of the series. This may cause curvature of the log kva a plot. 

It is important to emphasize that spectroscopic evidence shows that water transforms the Lewis acid sites of sulfated zirconia into Bronsted acid sites [80]. At the same time, water promotes isomerization reactions over sulfated zirconia for a moderate extent of catalyst dehydration. Similarities were reported between the effect of rehydration on the isomerization activity of sulfated zirconia [81] and on that of other oxide catalysts [49] that are consistent with the role of surface donor sites in hydrocarbon isomerization reactions. However, when spectroscopic methods using basic probes were used to compare sulfated zirconia and zeolites in terms of the strength of their acid sites, the results were inconsistent with all catalytic data. These findings illustrate the danger of comparing the acidity of catalyst systems that differ in structure and composition, such as zeolites and sulfated zirconia in these systems the "catalytic" and the "physicochemical" scales for the strength of acid-base interaction may contain significantly different parameters. 

---