Surface crystal nucleation

A number of theories have been put forth to explain the mechanism of polytype formation (30—36), such as the generation of steps by screw dislocations on single-crystal surfaces that could account for the large number of polytypes formed (30,35,36). The growth of crystals via the vapor phase is beheved to occur by surface nucleation and ledge movement by face specific reactions (37). The soHd-state transformation from one polytype to another is beheved to occur by a layer-displacement mechanism (38) caused by nucleation and expansion of stacking faults in close-packed double layers of Si and C. 

Models used to describe the growth of crystals by layers call for a two-step process (/) formation of a two-dimensional nucleus on the surface and (2) spreading of the solute from the two-dimensional nucleus across the surface. The relative rates at which these two steps occur give rise to the mononuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory and the polynuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory. In the mononuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory, the surface nucleation step occurs at a finite rate, whereas the spreading across the surface is assumed to occur at an infinite rate. The reverse is tme for the polynuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory. Erom the mononuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory, growth is related to supersaturation by the equation. 

It has been shown that an increase in crystallizer residence time, or decrease in feed concentration, reduces the working level of supersaturation. This decrease in supersaturation results in a decrease in both nucleation and crystal growth. This in turn leads to a decrease in crystal surface area. By mass balance, this then causes an increase in the working solute concentration and hence an increase in the working level of supersaturation and so on. There is thus a complex feedback loop within a continuous crystallizer, illustrated in Figure 7.11. 

One of the more important uses of OM is the study of crystallization growth rates. K. Cermak constructed an interference microscope with which measurements can be taken to 50° (Ref 31). This app allows for study of the decompn of the solution concentrated in close proximity to the growing crystal of material such as Amm nitrate or K chlorate. In connection with this technique, Stein and Powers (Ref 30) derived equations for growth rate data which allow for correct prediction of the effects of surface nucleation, surface truncation in thin films, and truncation by neighboring spherulites... 

Growth theories of surfaces have received considerable attention over the last sixty years as summarized by Laudise et al. [53] and Jackson [54]. The well-known model of the crystal surface incorporating adatoms, ledges and kinks was first introduced by Kossel [55] and Stranski [56]. Becker and Doring [57] calculated the rates of nucleation of new layers of atoms, and Papapetrou [58] investigated dendritic crystallization. 

Finally we would like to draw attention to low molecular weight results and their analysis on the basis of surface nucleation theory. The theory was originally developed for infinitely long chains and cannot easily be applied to extended or once-folded chain crystallization. Therefore any discrepancies in this area would not be surprising and would not discredit the theory at higher molecular weights. 

A drastic departure from nucleation theory was made by Sadler [44] who proposed that the crystal surface was thermodynamically rough and a barrier term arises from the possible paths a polymer may take before crystallizing in a favourable configuration. His simulation and models have shown that this would give results consistent with experiments. The two-dimensional row model is not far removed from Point s initial nucleation barrier, and is practically identical to a model investigated by Dupire [35]. Further comparison between the two theories would be beneficial. 

Dehydration reactions are typically both endothermic and reversible. Reported kinetic characteristics for water release show various a—time relationships and rate control has been ascribed to either interface reactions or to diffusion processes. Where water elimination occurs at an interface, this may be characterized by (i) rapid, and perhaps complete, initial nucleation on some or all surfaces [212,213], followed by advance of the coherent interface thus generated, (ii) nucleation at specific surface sites [208], perhaps maintained during reaction [426], followed by growth or (iii) (exceptionally) water elimination at existing crystal surfaces without growth [62]. 

Second, the molecular orientation of the fiber and the prepolymer matrix is important. The rate of crystal nucleation at the fiber-matrix interface depends on the orientation of matrix molecules just prior to their change of phase from liquid to solid. Thus, surface-nucleated morphologies are likely to dominate the matrix stmcture. 

Massive barite crystals (type C) are also composed of very fine grain-sized (several xm) microcrystals and have rough surfaces. Very fine barite particles are found on outer rims of the Hanaoka Kuroko chimney, while polyhedral well-formed barite is in the inner side of the chimney (type D). Type D barite is rarely observed in black ore. These scanning electron microscopic observations suggest that barite precipitation was controlled by a surface reaction mechanism (probably surface nucleation, but not spiral growth mechanism) rather than by a bulk diffusion mechanism. 

---