Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Crystal covalent models

Schaffer CE (1968) A Perturbation Representation of Weak Covalent Bonding. 5 68-95 Schaffer CE (1973) Two Symmetry Parameterizations of the Angular-Overlap Model of the Ligand-Field. Relation to the Crystal-Field Model. 14 69-110 Scheldt WR, Lee YJ (1987) Recent Advances in the Stereochemistry of Metallotetrapyrroles. 64 1-70... [Pg.254]

The general influence of covalency can be qualitatively explained in a very basic MO scheme. For example, we may consider the p-oxo Fe(III) dimers that are encountered in inorganic complexes and nonheme iron proteins, such as ribonucleotide reductase. In spite of a half-filled crystal-field model), the ferric high-spin ions show quadrupole splittings as large as 2.45 mm s < 0, 5 = 0.53 mm s 4.2-77 K) [61, 62]. This is explained... [Pg.100]

Vanadium(n) Complexes.—Dehydration of VSO. THjO has been shown to proceed via the formation of VS04,mH20 (where n = 6, 4, or 1) and V(OH)-(SO4), which were characterized by X-ray studies. The polarographic behaviour and the oxidation potential of the V -l,2-cyclohexanediamine-tetra-acetic acid complex, at pH 6—12, have been determined.Formation constants and electronic spectra have been reported for the [Vlphen),] " and [V20(phen)] complexes. The absorption spectrum of V ions doped in cadmium telluride has been presented and interpreted on a crystal-field model. The unpaired spin density in fluorine 2pit-orbitals of [VF ] , arising from covalent transfer and overlap with vanadium orbitals, has been determined by ENDOR spectroscopy and interpreted using a covalent model. " ... [Pg.38]

Van Vleck also pointed out that even in the case of very highly covalent bonding [as in, e.g., Ni(CO)4 or Fe(CN)J ], which is best treated by using MO theory, the symmetry properties and requirements remain exactly the same as for the crystal field model and the ligand field model. [Pg.254]

Typical metallic substances have structures which cannot readily be described either in terms of directional covalent bonds or as arrays of cations and anions. Metallic elemental substances exhibit high coordination numbers, and can - to a first approximation - be viewed as arrays of cations embedded in a sea or glue of electrons completely delocalised over the crystal. This model helps to explain the characteristic mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of metals. It is also consistent with... [Pg.95]

Before leaving this brief introduction to molecular orbital theory, it is worth stressing one point. This model constructs a series of new molecular orbitals by the combination of metal and ligand orbitals, and it is fundamental to the scheme that the ligand energy levels and bonding are, and must be, altered upon co-ordination. Whilst the crystal field model probably over-emphasises the ionic contribution to the metal-ligand interaction, the molecular orbital models probably over-emphasise the covalent nature. [Pg.12]

The reduction of the free-ion parameters has been ascribed to different mechanisms, where in general two types of models can be distinguished. On the one hand, one has the most often used wavefunction renormalisation or covalency models, which consider an expansion of the open-shell orbitals in the crystal (Jprgcnscn and Reisfeld, 1977). This expansion follows either from a covalent admixture with ligand orbitals (symmetry-restricted covalency mechanism) or from a modification of the effective nuclear charge Z, due to the penetration of the ligand electron clouds into the metal ion (central-field covalency mechanism). [Pg.529]

Crystal field theory, intensities of 4f-4f transitions, Judd-Ofelt theory of electric-dipole transitions, covalency model of hypersensitivity, dynamic coupling mechanism, solution spectra, spectral data for complexes, solvent effects, fluorescence and photochemistry of lanthanide complexes are dealt with in spectroscopy of lanthanide complexes. [Pg.1000]

Perhaps the more important questions raised by Rule 5, as Burdett and McLarnan (1984) point out, concern the extent to which it really is borne out by observation. For example, Baur et al. (1983) have developed a numerical index for the degree of parsimony in a crystal structure and have shown that, using this measure, many crystal structures are not parsimonious but lavish in their use of different local environments. Also, the dominance of short-range forces is by no means obvious when ordered structures with extremely large unit cells are observed (e.g., a c dimension of 1500 A in some SiC polytypes Shaffer, 1969). The explanation of such structures poses problems for electrostatic as well as covalent models. [Pg.343]

The introduction and implementation of heteronuclear-based multidimensional techniques have revolutionized the protein NMR field. Large proteins (> 100 residues) are now amenable to detailed NMR studies and structure determination. These techniques, however, necessarily require a scheme by which and isotopes can be incorporated into the protein to yield a uniformly labeled sample. Additional complications, such as extensive covalent post-translational modifications, can seriously limit the ability to efficiently and cost effectively express a protein in isotope enriched media - the c-type cytochromes are an example of such a limitation. In the absence of an effective labeling protocol, one must therefore rely on more traditional proton homonuclear NMR methods. These include two-dimensional (1) and, more recently, three-dimensional H experiments (2,3). Cytochrome c has become a paradigm for protein folding and electron transfer studies because of its stability, solubility and ease of preparation. As a result, several high-resolution X-ray crystal structure models for c-type cytochromes, in both redox states, have emerged. Although only subtle structural differences between redox states have been observed in these... [Pg.511]

Thus, although the crystal field model has proved to be quite useful in discussions of ligand field splittings in copper(II) systems, it suffers from some serious defects and a comparable empirical model which takes explicit account of a- and n-covalence has obvious appeal. We must therefore turn to the angular overlap model. [Pg.84]


See other pages where Crystal covalent models is mentioned: [Pg.100]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.928]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.927]    [Pg.1492]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.594]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.294 ]




SEARCH



Covalent model

Crystal covalency

Modeling crystallization

Shell model covalent crystals

© 2024 chempedia.info