Cracking units

In a single stage, without liquid recycle, the conversion can be optimized between 60 and 90%. The very paraffinic residue is used to make lubricant oil bases of high viscosity index in the range of 150 N to 350 N the residue can also be used as feedstock to steam cracking plants providing ethylene and propylene yields equal to those from paraffinic naphthas, or as additional feedstock to catalytic cracking units. 

With regard to the unconverted residue, the VI after dewaxing is 120 to 135 and the BMCI is between 10 and 15, which makes it an excellent feed for steam cracking units. 

Acid gases are mainly hydrogen sulfide (H2S) originating essentially from hydrotreating units off-gas. Smaller quantities are also produced in thermal and catalytic cracking units. 

Contaminated water comes from primary distillation (desalting), hydrotreating, thermal cracking and catalytic cracking units. 

Methyl /-Butyl Ether. MTBE is produced by reaction of isobutene and methanol on acid ion-exchange resins. The supply of isobutene, obtained from hydrocarbon cracking units or by dehydration of tert-huty alcohol, is limited relative to that of methanol. The cost to produce MTBE from by-product isobutene has been estimated to be between 0.13 to 0.16/L ( 0.50—0.60/gal) (90). Direct production of isobutene by dehydrogenation of isobutane or isomerization of mixed butenes are expensive processes that have seen less commercial use in the United States. 

The most important commercial use of ethane and propane is in the production of ethylene (qv) by way of high temperature (ca 1000 K) thermal cracking. In the United States, ca 60% of the ethylene is produced by thermal cracking of ethane or ethane/propane mixtures. Large ethylene plants have been built in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and England based on ethane recovery from natural gas in these locations. Ethane cracking units have been installed in AustraHa, Qatar, Romania, and Erance, among others. 

Dehydrogenation. Dehydrogenation of / -butane was once used to make 1,3-butadiene, a precursor for synthetic mbber. There are currently no on-purpose butadiene plants operating in the United States butadiene is usually obtained as a by-product from catalytic cracking units. 

Gas oil is a product hoiling slightly higher (235—425°C, or sometimes wider) than kerosene. The main feedstock to the catalytic cracking units (see Feedstocks), it received its name from use as an enriching agent in the production of city or manufactured gas. It is often used as diesel fuel. 

Reduced Emissions and Waste Minimization. Reducing harmful emissions and minimizing wastes within a process by inclusion of additional reaction and separation steps and catalyst modification may be substantially better than end-of-pipe cleanup or even simply improving maintenance, housekeeping, and process control practices. SO2 and NO reduction to their elemental products in fluid catalytic cracking units exemplifies the use of such a strategy (11). 

The process of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is the central process in a modem, gasoline-oriented refinery. In U.S. refineries, the amount of feed processed by fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU) is equivalent to 35% of the total cmde oil processed in the United States (1). As of January 1991, installed FCCU capacity in the United States was 8.6 x ICf m /d (5.4 x 10 barrels/d). 

Since the first fluid-bed catalytic cracking unit was commissioned in 1942, more than 300 additional units have been built. During this time, the process has evolved and has seen considerable improvement in mechanical constmction, reflabiUty, and process flow. A modern FCCU typically operates continuously for three to four years between turnarounds, during which time 10 kg of feedstock are processed and 7 x 10 ° kg of catalyst circulated. Early FCCU designs, (53) were complex compared with the compact configuration of more recent design (Fig. 1). 

A. P. Kreuding, "Power Recovery Techniques as AppHed to Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Regenerator Flue Gas," presented at 79thFEChE... 

J. G. Wilson and D. W. Miller, "Removal of Particulate Matter from Fluid-Bed Catalytic Cracking Unit Stack Gases," f AirPollut. Mssoc. 7, 682 (Oct. 1967). 

FIG. 13-88 Catalytic cracking unit, (New Horizons, Lummus Co., New York, 1954.)... 

Figure 2.3.1 (Wachtel, et al, 1972) shows the ARCO reactor that tried to simulate the real reaction conditions in a fluid cracking unit. This was a formal scale-down where many important similarities had to be sacrificed to get a workable unit. This unit was still too large for a laboratory study or test unit, but instead was pilot-plant equipment that could still give useful empirical results Since this serves a very large industry, it may pay off to try it, even if it costs a lot to operate.

Figure 2.3.2 (Kraemer and deLasa 1988) shows this reactor. DeLasa suggested for Riser Simulator a Fluidized Recycle reactor that is essentially an upside down Berty reactor. Kraemer and DeLasa (1988) also described a method to simulate the riser of a fluid catalyst cracking unit in this reactor.

A satisfactory smdy of the application of the flue gas expander to a particular fluid catalytic cracking unit must include the following steps ... 

In support of the power recovery expander market for fluid catalytic cracking units in refineries, some turboexpander manufacturers have an ongoing program to improve the solid particle erosion characteristics of the machine. Improved erosion characteristics will result in longer blade life, less downtime, and consequently greater profits for the users. 

---