Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Counterions surfaces

FIG. 3 Cation surface species on the basal planes of 2 1 layer type clay minerals. Inset indicates the spectroscopic methods used to quantify counterion surface species, their intrinsic time scales over which molecular structure is probed, and the residence time of surface species. [Pg.217]

Figure 5. Estimation of critical surface tension, yc, for the undissociated Cl counterion surface... Figure 5. Estimation of critical surface tension, yc, for the undissociated Cl counterion surface...
The specific case to be considered is that of the Cl" counterion surface in contact with a dilute salt solution—e.g., at 10 2N NaCl where 0 = 28° (Table II). Data of Stigter (33) show that the fraction of Cl" counterions outside the shear surface of dodecyl ammonium chloride micelles is about 0.4 in the range 0.02-0.05M NaCl plus surfactant at the critical micelle concentration (CMC). This value appears to rise toward 0.5-0.6 as NaCl concentration is lowered. Conductance data of Robins and Thomas (30) indicate that 73% of Cl" counterions are bound to 2-dodecyl aminoethanol hydrochloride micelles at the CMC in the absence of added salt. [Pg.571]

Surface active electrolytes produce charged micelles whose effective charge can be measured by electrophoretic mobility [117,156]. The net charge is lower than the degree of aggregation, however, since some of the counterions remain associated with the micelle, presumably as part of a Stem layer (see Section V-3) [157]. Combination of self-diffusion with electrophoretic mobility measurements indicates that a typical micelle of a univalent surfactant contains about 1(X) monomer units and carries a net charge of 50-70. Additional colloidal characterization techniques are applicable to micelles such as ultrafiltration [158]. [Pg.481]

Because of the charged nature of many Langmuir films, fairly marked effects of changing the pH of the substrate phase are often observed. An obvious case is that of the fatty-acid monolayers these will be ionized on alkaline substrates, and as a result of the repulsion between the charged polar groups, the film reverts to a gaseous or liquid expanded state at a much lower temperature than does the acid form [121]. Also, the surface potential drops since, as illustrated in Fig. XV-13, the presence of nearby counterions introduces a dipole opposite in orientation to that previously present. A similar situation is found with long-chain amines on acid substrates [122]. [Pg.557]

At finite positive and negative charge densities on the electrode, the counterion density profiles often exhibit significantly higher maxima, i.e. there is an overshoot, and the derived potential actually shows oscillations itself close to the electrode surface at concentrations above about 1 M. [Pg.596]

It turned out that the dodecylsulfate surfactants Co(DS)i Ni(DS)2, Cu(DS)2 and Zn(DS)2 containing catalytically active counterions are extremely potent catalysts for the Diels-Alder reaction between 5.1 and 5.2 (see Scheme 5.1). The physical properties of these micelles have been described in the literature and a small number of catalytic studies have been reported. The influence of Cu(DS)2 micelles on the kinetics of quenching of a photoexcited species has been investigated. Interestingly, Kobayashi recently employed surfactants in scandium triflate catalysed aldol reactions". Robinson et al. have demonshuted that the interaction between metal ions and ligand at the surface of dodecylsulfate micelles can be extremely efficient. ... [Pg.139]

Precipitate formation can occur upon contact of iajection water ions and counterions ia formation fluids. Soflds initially preseat ia the iajectioa fluid, bacterial corrosioa products, and corrosion products from metal surfaces ia the iajectioa system can all reduce near-weUbore permeability. Injectivity may also be reduced by bacterial slime that can grow on polymer deposits left ia the wellbore and adjacent rock. Strong oxidising agents such as hydrogen peroxide, sodium perborate, and occasionally sodium hypochlorite can be used to remove these bacterial deposits (16—18). [Pg.189]

The layer of solution immediately adjacent to the surface that contains counterions not part of the soHd stmcture, but bound so tightly to the surface that they never exchange with the solution, is the Stem layer. The plane separating this layer from the next is the Stem plane. The potential at the Stem plane is smaller than that at the surface. [Pg.545]

Figure 5 shows the enhanced concentration of oppositely charged ions near the charged surface, and the depleted concentration of similarly charged ions near the charged surface due to electrostatic attractions and repulsions. Both factors reduce the effective potential, /, as the distance from the surface, X, increases. The distance at which / drops to 1/ (37%) of its value at the Stem plane is called the counterion atmosphere decay distance,... [Pg.545]

The adsorbed layer at G—L or S—L surfaces ia practical surfactant systems may have a complex composition. The adsorbed molecules or ions may be close-packed forming almost a condensed film with solvent molecules virtually excluded from the surface, or widely spaced and behave somewhat like a two-dimensional gas. The adsorbed film may be multilayer rather than monolayer. Counterions are sometimes present with the surfactant ia the adsorbed layer. Mixed moaolayers are known that iavolve molecular complexes, eg, oae-to-oae complexes of fatty alcohol sulfates with fatty alcohols (10), as well as complexes betweea fatty acids and fatty acid soaps (11). Competitive or preferential adsorption between multiple solutes at G—L and L—L iaterfaces is an important effect ia foaming, foam stabiLizatioa, and defoaming (see Defoamers). [Pg.236]

As the pH is iacreased or decreased from the isoelectric point, the particles acquire a charge (surface potential) that can enhance repulsion. Surface charge on the particle can be approximated by measuring 2eta potential, which is the electrostatic potential at the Stem layer surrounding a particle. The Stem layer is the thickness of the rigid or nondiffiise layer of counterions at a distance (5) from the particle surface, which corresponds to the electrostatic potential at the surface divided by e (2.718...). [Pg.147]

In the polar pores, the diffusion coefficient of all ions is strongly reduced relative to the bulk values. No counterion dependence is observed for the SDC of CP. A more detailed analysis shows that the ion SDC depends on the ion s relative position in the pore [174]. In the case of the K ion, this dependence is particularly strong. K ions forming contact pairs with the surface charges are almost completely immobilized on the time scale of the simulations. The few remaining ions in the center of the pore are almost unaffected by the (screened) surface charges. The fact that most of the K ions form contact pairs substantially reduces the average value of the normalized K SDC to 0.2. The behavior of CP is similar to that of K. The SDC of sodium ions, which... [Pg.372]

D. M. Anderson. A new technique for studying microstructures NMR band-shapes of polymerized surfactants and counterions in microstructures described by minimal surfaces. J Physique Colloque 57 1-18, 1990. [Pg.741]

Manning s theory does not take the local effective dielectric constant into consideration, but simply uses the a value of bulk water for the calculation of E,. However, since counterion condensation is supposed to take place on the surface of polyions. Manning s 2, should be modified to E, by replacing a with aeff. The modified parameters E, is compared with E, in Table 1, which leads to the conclusion that the linear charge density parameter calculated with the bulk dielectric constant considerably underestimates the correct one corresponding to the interfacial dielectric constant. [Pg.60]

Referring to the ionic effects, measuring of swelling in solutions which closely model real ones can provide reliable estimates. The papers [58, 132] can serve as examples of such an approach. In choosing a type of SAH suitable for some particular soil it is necessary to take into account the acid-base properties of the gel and the soil because otherwise collapse phenomena are likely to result from common counterions and the sorption on solid surfaces. [Pg.129]


See other pages where Counterions surfaces is mentioned: [Pg.137]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.6067]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.6067]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.1739]    [Pg.2677]    [Pg.2900]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.2031]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.747]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.21]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.71 ]




SEARCH



Counterion

Counterions

Surface counterion concentration

© 2024 chempedia.info