Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Correlated plastic deformation

Correlated plastic deformation in polymers is very evident in the necking of polymeric rods or filaments. This is one form of inhomogeneous deformation. Experiments with Nylon filaments, for example, have shown that necks in them behave quite similarly to the Lueders bands observed in steel (Dey, 1967). This strongly suggests that plastic deformation in Nylon is associated with the motion of dislocations. [Pg.166]

In comparing the correlation sought between MH and E one should emphasize the following while the plastic deformation of lamellae at larger strains when measuring MH depends primarily on crystal thickness and perfection in case of the elastic modulus the major role is played by the amorphous layer reinforced by tie molecules, which is elastically deformed at small strains. Figure 17 illustrates de... [Pg.136]

Since the hardness test involves a substantial component of plastic deformation, hardness values are linked with tensile strength and not with yield strength when correlation between hardness and tensile properties are carried out. This appears to be a relationship between the hardness and tensile properties are carried out. There appears to be a relationship between he hardness of a metal and its tensile strength, but no general application has been found to exist. However, the following empirical relationship appears to hold fairly well for most steels, other than heavily cold worked steels or austenitic steels. [Pg.30]

Impurities, such as grit, shreds of cotton, even in small quantities, sensitize an expl to frictional impact. That is why utmost cleanliness must be exercised in the preparation of expls. There are differences in the sensitivity of azides to mechanical and thermal influences. They have been correlated with the structure of the outer electronic orbits, the electrochemical potential, the ionization energy and the arrangement of atoms within the crystal. Functions of the polarizability of the cation are the plastic deformability of the crystals, and their surface properties. The nature of cation in an azide, such as Pb(Nj)2, has little effect on the energy released by the decomposition, which is vested in the N ion. The high heat of formation of the N2 molecule accounts... [Pg.514]

By necessity, the treatment of solid state kinetics has to be selective in view of the myriad processes which can occur in the solid state. This multitude is mainly due to three facts 1) correlation lengths in crystals are often much larger than in fluids and may comprise the whole crystal, 2) a structure element is characterized by three parameters instead of only by two in a liquid (chemical species, electrical charge, type of crystallographic site), and 3) a crystal can be elastically stressed. The stress state is normally inhomogeneous. If the yield strength is exceeded, then plastic deformation and the formation of dislocations will change the structural state of a crystal. What we aim at in this book is a strict treatment of concepts and basic situations in a quantitative way, so far as it is possible. In contrast, the often extremely complex kinetic situations in solid state chemistry and materials science will be analyzed in a rather qualitative manner, but with clearcut thermodynamic and kinetic concepts. [Pg.6]

In general, the fracture energy of a network is correlated to its ability for plastic deformation. This means that GIc decreases with an increase of oy. The influence of test variables (T, e) on ay was analyzed before (Sec. 12.3.4), and can explain the changes observed in GIc values. [Pg.386]

In contrast to the simplicity of elastic deformation, plastic deformation occurs in diverse ways. Figure 1.9 illustrates the stress-strain curves for two typical elastoplastic materials (hardened metal and polymer). Both materials show similar linear relationships between stress and strain for the elastic deformation (i.e., before yield strength) but quite different correlations in the yielding processes before fracture. [Pg.30]

In principle, an equality between the thermodynamic work of adhesion of liquid-solid systems and the work needed to separate an interface might be expected for simple systems and this has been observed for failure of adhesive-polymer interfaces bonded by van der Waals forces, (Kinloch 1987). Similarly, empirical correlations of interfacial strengths and work of adhesion values of solidified interfaces have been reported for some nominally non-reactive pure metal/ceramic systems. However, mechanical separation of such interfaces is a complex process that usually involves plastic deformation of the lattices, and hence their works of fracture are often at least ten and sometimes one hundred times larger than the works of adhesion, (Howe 1993). Nevertheless, for non-reactive metal/ceramic couples, it is now widely recognised that the energy dissipated by plasticity (and as a result the fracture energy of the interface) scales with the thermodynamic work of adhesion (Reimanis et al. 1991, Howe 1993, Tomsiaet al. 1995). [Pg.373]

The Heckel equation describes the densification process with first-order kinetics. A linear equation is obtained with a slope which is inversely proportional to the yield strength. The slope of the Heckel equation provides information on the plastic deformation of the powder. It has also been published that the slope of the Heckel equation can be correlated with the elastic modulus (Young s modulus). [Pg.1076]

These differences were correlated with the size of the rubber particles in the systems the smaller the diameter of the dispersed phase (e.g. the lower the interparticular distance), the higher the benefits of a /3-nucleation (Fig. 25b). For the grades with the smallest particle sizes, it might be attributed to an easier plastic deformation of the matrix once the damage mechanisms initiated (by particle cavitation) as a result of the smaller matrix ligaments between the rubber phase. [Pg.76]

Plastic Contact Conductance Model of Greenwood and Williamson. Sridhar and Yovanovich [109] developed correlation equations for the contact conductance of conforming rough surfaces based on the Greenwood and Williamson [26] surface model using the plastic deformation model described above. The dimensionless contact conductance correlation is... [Pg.186]


See other pages where Correlated plastic deformation is mentioned: [Pg.204]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.1157]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.1081]    [Pg.1137]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.828]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.1845]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.219]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.166 ]




SEARCH



Deformability plastic

Deformation plasticity

Deformed plastics

Plastic deformation

Plastic deformity

© 2024 chempedia.info